Elsevier

Forest Ecology and Management

Volume 482, 15 February 2021, 118886
Forest Ecology and Management

Review and synthesis
Forests of the future: Climate change impacts and implications for carbon storage in the Pacific Northwest, USA

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118886Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

Rising greenhouse gases are changing the Earth’s climate and adversely affecting ecosystems that currently provide a suite of invaluable benefits, from cleaning water to sequestering carbon. Some of the world’s most productive forests grow in the Pacific Northwest region of North America, but our understanding of climate change effects on these forests and their carbon is still emerging. Here, we synthesize the current state of research (including empirical, paleo, and modeling studies), discuss the implications on forest growth and carbon storage in Pacific Northwest forests, and identify key knowledge gaps and future research opportunities based on a combination of published studies and expert opinion. Two case studies are presented that illustrate the expected effects of climate change on moist and dry forest ecology and carbon storage. In response to these impacts, we highlight a number of appropriate regional forest restoration and management adaptation strategies. Filling in knowledge gaps will improve the accuracy of forest carbon accounting, a crucial part of the strategy to meet climate mitigation targets and prevent the most severe impacts of climate change.

Introduction

Rising greenhouse gases (GHGs) and resulting climate change is already affecting the Earth’s terrestrial and aquatic systems (Steffen et al., 2018). Current mitigation efforts are largely aimed at curbing human caused greenhouse gas emissions; however, to keep global temperatures below 1.5 °C and avoid some of the worst impacts of climate change, these strategies must also prevent additional CO2 from being released from land and sea ecosystems and soak up as much atmospheric CO2 as possible (IPCC, 2018, USGCRP, 2018). One such removal technology – natural climate solutions – is found within our ability to conserve and restore forests and improve natural resource management practices, which results in increased carbon storage and/or a reduction in GHG emissions (Fargione et al., 2018, Griscom et al., 2017). A critical piece of natural climate solutions is maximizing carbon storage and sequestration, the ability to remove CO2 from the atmosphere and store it long-term. Natural climate solutions for forests can include afforestation, reforestation, or protecting forest carbon storage and sequestration potential by minimizing impacts (Law et al., 2018, Moomaw et al., 2020, Zomer et al., 2008).

Globally, forests absorb 15–20% of annual human carbon emissions (Le Quéré et al., 2018), most of which is stored either aboveground in tree biomass or belowground as soil carbon. The Pacific Northwest (PNW) region of North America has some of the greatest natural terrestrial carbon storage potential within North America (Hudiburg et al., 2009, Smithwick et al., 2002). For instance, in the US, live tree aboveground carbon density in PNW moist coastal forests regularly contains more than 80 megagrams (Mg) per hectare (ha) of carbon compared to other regions - forests in Midwest states (40–60 Mg/ha) and forests in Northeast states (60–80 Mg/ha) (Wilson et al., 2013). PNW moist coastal forests are highly productive and have historically stored carbon for long periods of time in part because of their longevity and the high amounts of precipitation they receive, which also manifests in a historically long fire return interval. Further, forests in the West Cascades ecoregion of the PNW are estimated to have more than double the amount of total carbon stored compared to forests in the East Cascades ecoregion (Law et al., 2018). However, there is substantial heterogeneity in PNW forests, and they can differ greatly in response to climate, steep elevation gradients, soils, and complex disturbance and land-use histories (Franklin and Dyrness, 1988). Moreover, there are diverse environments and ecological systems across the PNW that respond differently to a warming climate, changes in disturbance patterns, and natural resource management (Halpern and Spies, 1995).

Broadly, PNW forested systems can be categorized as moist, dry, and subalpine forests. Geographically, moist and dry forest types are generally found on the western and eastern sides of the Cascade Divide, respectively, while subalpine forests are located at high elevations (Fig. 1). Each forest type has a unique set of defining characteristics, disturbance factors, and responses to a changing climate (Fig. 1). However, many climate mitigation targets that specifically rely on forest carbon storage and sequestration do not incorporate these differences. For example, California’s Forest Climate Action Plan (Forest Climate Action Team, 2018), does not account for responses of individual forest types to climate change. Moreover, there are current gaps in our understanding of how climate change will influence forests and how those effects will impact carbon storage and sequestration. These knowledge gaps have the potential to derail the path to current mitigation targets.

In this review, we synthesize how climate change is expected to affect major forest types in the PNW and highlight how carbon storage will likely be impacted. We first summarize the existing literature on the direct and indirect climate change impacts on forests. Second, we identify key climate change impacts on PNW forests and their ability to store carbon. Third, we combine scientific studies and expert opinion to explore some of the critical knowledge gaps of how climate change will impact forests and carbon and offer several actionable strategies in response. These key knowledge gaps form a foundation for future forest carbon research opportunities and, once addressed, will help lead to more accurate projections of climate change impacts on forests and carbon and thus more effective management strategies. To demonstrate this process, we briefly present two case studies that illustrate how climate change is anticipated to affect moist and dry forests and their carbon storage. Finally, we highlight appropriate adaptation strategies that are currently or planned for implementation. This review is intended to be used by regional conservation organizations to better inform their forest restoration and management strategies as well as prepare for an uncertain future.

Section snippets

Climate change effects on forests

Climate change impacts forests both directly and indirectly (Bonan, 2008) and can be exacerbated by human effects (Fig. 2). The direct impacts to forests manifest through changes in temperature and precipitation (i.e., climate), whereas indirect effects include changes to the occurrence of disturbances or other factors (e.g., fire, insect outbreaks, pathogens) (Anderson-Teixeira et al., 2013). Some of these disturbances have the power to turn forests from a sink to a source of carbon (Peterson

Climate change impacts on PNW forests and carbon storage

There are numerous ways in which climate change will directly and indirectly effect vegetation throughout the PNW (Peterson et al., 2014). As such, we synthesize findings from multiple sources of information including empirical, paleoecological, and modeling studies. Although there are varying degrees of uncertainty associated with future projections, models that simulate changes in climate and vegetation response can provide us insight into these impacts. However, as climate change creates

Critical knowledge gaps & future directions

Here, we summarize key knowledge gaps in our current understanding of how climate change is expected to affect forest types and their carbon across the PNW. There is a general lack of synthesized information on climate change effects on forests and carbon. In response, we augmented observational and experimental data with expert knowledge, which tends to incorporate information from the published literature, empirical data, unpublished studies, and their experiences (Martin et al., 2012). Our

Case studies

To demonstrate how this review can be used to better inform current forest restoration and management strategies, we briefly present two case studies that detail how 1) climate change is expected to affect two very different forest types and their stored carbon and 2) management is being applied to build climate change resilience and preserve long-term carbon storage.

Conclusion

We have reviewed some of the key ways in which climate change is expected to affect PNW forests and the carbon they store. For instance, under a high warming scenario, a longer summer dry period may lead to drought stress and decreased growth, productivity and a potential decrease in the ability of moist forests to sequester carbon. Although many tree species in moist forests are very long-lived, an increase in wildfire occurrence could also facilitate the establishment of more southern species

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the many experts who provided input and perspective on this review. Marcia Baker and Phil Levin provided helpful comments on an early draft of this manuscript. We appreciate the support of the Nature Conservancy in Washington and their dedication to evidence-based conservation.

References (225)

  • J.T. Abatzoglou et al.

    Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests

    P. Natl. A. Sci.

    (2016)
  • H.D. Adams et al.

    Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought

    P. Natl. A. Sci.

    (2009)
  • J.K. Agee

    Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests

    (1996)
  • K. Albrich et al.

    Climate change causes critical transitions and irreversible alterations of mountain forests

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2020)
  • C.D. Allen et al.

    Drought-induced shift of a forest-woodland ecotone: Rapid landscape response to climate variation

    P. Natl. A. Sci.

    (1998)
  • W.R.L. Anderegg et al.

    Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress

    Nature Clim. Change

    (2013)
  • K.J. Anderson-Teixeira et al.

    Altered dynamics of forest recovery under a changing climate

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2013)
  • D. Bachelet et al.

    Translating MC2 DGVM Results into Ecosystem Services for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation

    Climate

    (2018)
  • D. Bachelet et al.

    Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2015)
  • Bachelet, D., Lenihan, J.M., Daly, C., Neilson, R.P., Ojima, D.S., Parton, W.J., 2001. MC1: a dynamic vegetation model...
  • V.L. Bailey et al.

    Soil carbon cycling proxies: Understanding their critical role in predicting climate change feedbacks

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2018)
  • V.L. Bailey et al.

    What do we know about soil carbon destabilization?

    Environ. Res. Lett.

    (2019)
  • R.D. Bardgett et al.

    Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks

    The ISME Journal

    (2008)
  • K.J. Bartowitz et al.

    Post-Fire Carbon Dynamics in Subalpine Forests of the Rocky Mountains

    Fire

    (2019)
  • B. Beckage et al.

    A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2008)
  • B.J. Bentz et al.

    Climate Change and Bark Beetles of the Western United States and Canada: Direct and Indirect Effects

    Bioscience

    (2010)
  • D. Berardi et al.

    21st-century biogeochemical modeling: Challenges for Century-based models and where do we go from here?

    GCB Bioenergy

    (2020)
  • L.T. Berner et al.

    Water availability limits tree productivity, carbon stocks, and carbon residence time in mature forests across the western US

    Biogeosciences

    (2017)
  • L.T. Berner et al.

    Tree mortality from fires, bark beetles, and timber harvest during a hot and dry decade in the western United States (2003–2012)

    Environ. Res. Lett.

    (2017)
  • R. Birdsey et al.

    Forest Carbon Management in the United States

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2006)
  • C. Boisvenue et al.

    Impacts of climate change on natural forest productivity – evidence since the middle of the 20th century

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2006)
  • G.B. Bonan

    Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests

    Science

    (2008)
  • G.E.P. Box

    Science and Statistics

    J. Am. Stat. Assoc.

    (1976)
  • J.B. Bradford et al.

    A window of opportunity for climate-change adaptation: easing tree mortality by reducing forest basal area

    Front. Ecol. Environ.

    (2017)
  • M.A. Bradford et al.

    Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change

    Nat. Clim. Change

    (2016)
  • D.D. Breshears et al.

    Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought

    PNAS

    (2005)
  • T.J. Brodribb et al.

    Hanging by a thread? Forests and drought

    Science

    (2020)
  • L.B. Brubaker

    Responses of Tree Populations to Climatic Change

    Vegetatio

    (1986)
  • B. Buma et al.

    The value of linking paleoecological and neoecological perspectives to understand spatially-explicit ecosystem resilience

    Landscape Ecol

    (2019)
  • B. Buma et al.

    Wildland fire reburning trends across the US West suggest only short-term negative feedback and differing climatic effects

    Environ. Res. Lett.

    (2020)
  • P.C. Buotte et al.

    Carbon sequestration and biodiversity co-benefits of preserving forests in the western United States

    Ecol. Appl.

    (2020)
  • P.C. Buotte et al.

    Near-future forest vulnerability to drought and fire varies across the western United States

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2019)
  • Burns, R.M., Honkala, B.H., 1990. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers: Volume 2. Hardwoods. (No. 654). U.S....
  • M. Busse et al.

    Global Change and Forest Soils: Global Change and Forest Soils: Cultivating Stewardship of a Finite Natural Resource

    (2019)
  • J.L. Campbell et al.

    Estimating uncertainty in the volume and carbon storage of downed coarse woody debris

    Ecol. Appl.

    (2019)
  • J.L. Campbell et al.

    Can fuel-reduction treatments really increase forest carbon storage in the western US by reducing future fire emissions?

    Front. Ecol. Environ.

    (2012)
  • C.A. Cansler et al.

    Climate, fire size, and biophysical setting control fire severity and spatial pattern in the northern Cascade Range, USA

    Ecol. Appl.

    (2014)
  • C.A. Cansler et al.

    Fire enhances the complexity of forest structure in alpine treeline ecotones

    Ecosphere

    (2018)
  • Case, M.J., Kerns, B.K., Kim, J.B., Eglitis, A., Simpson, M.L., Beck, J., Grenier, K., Riegel, G., 2019. Impacts and...
  • M.J. Case et al.

    Using a Vegetation Model and Stakeholder Input to Assess the Climate Change Vulnerability of Tribally Important Ecosystem Services

    Forests

    (2020)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Are climate change, urbanisation and political views correlated? Empirical evidence from South East Queensland

      2022, Urban Climate
      Citation Excerpt :

      The impacts of climate change have now become evident across the globe (Reyer et al., 2017; Case et al., 2021; Katelaris, 2021; Ortiz-Bobea et al., 2021).

    • Accelerating the development of structural complexity: lidar analysis supports restoration as a tool in coastal Pacific Northwest forests

      2021, Forest Ecology and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Important wildlife species including the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) and the marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratum) rely on the complex structures of these forests for various habitat requirements (Thomas et al., 1990, 2006 North et al., 1999; Franklin and Van Pelt, 2004). Late-successional forests also play an essential role in regulating important biophysical processes including the carbon cycle (e.g., carbon storage) and helping to maintain biodiversity, which are increasingly important functions given recent global trends in climate change and biodiversity loss (Franklin et al., 2002; Franklin and van Pelt, 2004; Butchart et al., 2010; Case et al., 2021). While production forestry persists across private lands in much of the PNW, federal forest management strategies in recent decades have focused on preserving or accelerating the development of late-successional forests to meet social and ecological objectives (Franklin and Johnson 2012; Davis et al., 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text