Abstract
We assessed fungal diversity in deep-sea sediments obtained from different depths in the Southern Ocean using the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of nuclear ribosomal DNA by metabarcoding through high-throughput sequencing (HTS). We detected 655,991 DNA reads representing 263 fungal amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), dominated by Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Chytridiomycota and Rozellomycota, confirming that deep-sea sediments can represent a hotspot of fungal diversity in Antarctica. The community diversity detected included 17 dominant fungal ASVs, 62 intermediate and 213 rare. The dominant fungi included taxa of Mortierella, Penicillium, Cladosporium, Pseudogymnoascus, Phaeosphaeria and Torula. Despite the extreme conditions of the Southern Ocean benthos, the total fungal community detected in these marine sediments displayed high indices of diversity and richness, and moderate dominance, which varied between the different depths sampled. The highest diversity indices were obtained in sediments from 550 m and 250 m depths. Only 49 ASVs (18.63%) were detected at all the depths sampled, while 16 ASVs were detected only in the deepest sediment sampled at 1463 m. Based on sequence identities, the fungal community included some globally distributed taxa, primarily recorded otherwise from terrestrial environments, suggesting transport from these to deep marine sediments. The assigned taxa included symbionts, decomposers and plant-, animal- and human-pathogenic fungi, suggesting that deep-sea sediments host a complex fungal diversity, although metabarcoding does not itself confirm that living or viable organisms are present.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Southern Ocean contributes 30% of global ocean area, surrounding the Antarctic continent [1,2]. It is characterized by extreme conditions for life, including chronically low temperature, salinity, pH variability and low nutrient availability, stressors that have strongly influenced the life that inhabits its ecosystems. Even today, the Southern Ocean is a unique region where microbial studies are still in their infancy [3], even though its varied substrates and habitats have the potential to support diverse microbial life [2].
The deep-sea benthos is one of the least known microbial environments on the planet. Its microbial ecosystems include bacteria, archaea [4] and fungi [5,6,7]. Fungi in marine ecosystems include saprophytic, pathogenic and symbiotic taxa, which are found from shallow coastal to deep-sea environments [8,9]. Fungi are among the most ecologically successful eukaryotic groups and have been detected at 10,897 m depth in the Mariana trench [10]. However, despite their ecological importance, few studies have addressed the presence of fungi in deep-sea sediments [11,12,13,14]. Knowledge of fungal diversity and ecology in the marine ecosystems of Antarctica is generally poor and particularly so in the deep sea [15]. Gonçalves et al. [16] highlighted that Antarctic deep-sea sediments represent important habitats that are suitable for the exploration of fungal life under extreme conditions.
Fungal taxa already reported from Antarctic marine sediments include primarily members of the phyla Ascomycota, Basidiomycota and Mucoromycota [15]. However, in studies of microbial diversity, difficulties in isolation and successful culturing mean that molecular studies involving non-culturing approaches can potentially reveal previously unrecognized fungal diversity [2]. In the current study, we assessed the fungal diversity, richness, abundance and distribution in marine sediments obtained from the Southern Ocean at depths between 153 and 1463 m using DNA metabarcoding through high-throughput sequencing (HTS).
Materials and Methods
Marine Sediment Sampling
Four deep-sea sediment samples (one per site) were collected from different locations around the South Shetland Islands and Drake Passage (Fig. 1) during the austral summers of the years 2014/2015 and 2015/2016. Samples were collected at depths of 153 m, 250 m, 550 m and 1463 m, using a gravity corer. Sections of 10 cm length (approximately 500 g of sediment) from the base of each core were selected, sealed, placed in sterile Whirl-pack (Nasco, Ft. Atkinson, WI) bags and frozen at − 20 °C until processing in the laboratory at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. There, the sampled core was gradually thawed at 4 °C for 24 h before carrying out DNA extraction. Three subsamples of the central parts of each core were obtained under aseptic conditions and processed, to increase the fungal DNA yield.
DNA Extraction and Sequence Identification
Total DNA of the three replicate subsamples from each core was extracted using the QIAGEN Power Soil Kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was used as a template for generating PCR amplicons. The internal transcribed spacer 2 region (ITS2) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA was used as a DNA barcode for molecular species identification [17,18]. PCR amplicons were generated using the universal primers ITS3 and ITS4 [19]. Library construction and DNA amplification were performed using the Library kit Herculase II Fusion DNA Polymerase Nextera XT Index Kit V2, following Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation Part #15044223 Rev. B protocol. Paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bp) was performed on a MiSeq System (Illumina) by Macrogen Inc. (South Korea).
Raw fastq files were filtered using BBDuk version 38.34 (BBMap – Bushnell B. – sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/) to remove Illumina adapters, known Illumina artifacts, and the PhiX Control v3 Library. Quality read filtering was carried out using Sickle version 1.33 -q 30 -l 50 [20], to trim 3′ or 5′ ends with low Phred quality score, and sequences shorter than 50 bp were also discarded. The remaining sequences were imported to QIIME2 version 2019.10 (https://qiime2.org/) for bioinformatics analyses [21]. The qiime2-dada2 plugin is a complete pipeline that was used for filtering, dereplication, turning paired-end fastq files into merged, and removing chimeras [22]. Taxonomic assignments were determined for amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) using the qiime2-feature-classifie [23] classify-sklearn against the UNITE ITS database version 8.2 [24] (filtered by fungi) and trained with Naive Bayes classifier with confidence threshold of 98.5%. Fungal classification followed Kirk et al. [25], Tedersoo et al. [26], MycoBank (http://www.mycobank.org) and the Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org).
Statistical Analyses
To quantify ASV diversity, richness and dominance, we used the following ecological indices: (i) Fisher’s α (diversity), (ii) Margalef’s (richness) and (iii) Simpson’s (dominance). The numbers of reads of the ASVs were used to quantify the fungal taxa present in the deep-sea sediments, where fungal ASVs with > 6000 reads were considered as dominant, ASVs with < 6000 and > 1000 reads as intermediate, and ASVs with < 1000 reads as minor (rare) components of the diversity present. All of the results were obtained with 95% confidence, and bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 iterations. Taxon accumulation curves were obtained using the Mao Tao index. All diversity indices and Mao Tao accumulation curve calculations were performed using PAST, version 1.90 [27]. Venn diagrams were prepared as described by Bardou et al. [28] to compare the sequence assemblages present in the deep-sea sediment samples. Functional assignments of fungal ASVs at species and generic levels were prepared using FunGuild [29], which can be accessed at http://www.funguild.org/.
Results
Fungal Taxonomy
Overall we detected 655,991 DNA reads in the sediment samples obtained from Maxwell Bay at 153 m (221,608) and 250 m (253,568), Bransfield Strait at 500 m (129,370) and Drake Passage at 1463 m (51,445) depths. The reads were classified into 263 fungal ASVs, with 126 detected at 153 m, 149 at 250 m, 135 at 550 m and 101 at 1453 m depths (Suppl. Table 1). The fungal community was dominated, in rank order, by the taxa of the phyla Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Chytridiomycota and Rozellomycota (Fig. 2). Of the total DNA reads, 182,257 (27.78%) could only be assigned as Fungi sp. and may represent currently unknown taxa or taxa not included in the UNITE database. Similarly, 46 ASVs could only be identified to higher taxonomic levels (phylum, class, order, family) and may represent new taxa and/or new records for Antarctica. The fungal community included 17 dominant fungal ASVs, 62 intermediate ASVs and 213 minority ASVs.
The dominant fungi, in rank order, included the taxa Fungi sp., Mortierella sp., Penicillium sp., Cladosporium sp., Agaricomycetes sp., Mortierella parvispora, Leotiomycetes sp., Pseudogymnoascus sp., Pseudogymnoascus appendiculatus, Didymosphaeriaceae sp., Penicillium herquei, Phaeosphaeria sp., Cladosporium halotolerans, Mortierella turficola, Pseudogymnoascus roseus, Diaporthales sp. and Torula hollandica.
Fungal Diversity
The Mao Tao rarefaction curves of the fungal assemblages detected in the sediment samples from the different depths reached asymptote (Fig. 3), indicating that the data provided a good description of the diversity present. Despite the extreme conditions of the Southern Ocean, the total fungal communities detected displayed high indices of diversity (Fisher’s α) and richness (Margalef), and moderate dominance (Simpson), with some variation among the depths sampled (Table 1). The highest values of diversity and richness were obtained at 250 m and 550 m depths, followed by 150 m and 1463 m depths. Of the 263 fungal ASVs detected in total, only 49 (18.63%) were detected at all four depths, with these including taxa from different genera (Fig. 4). Functional ecological assignments of the ASVs detected at generic level are shown in Suppl. Table 2.
Discussion
Fungal Taxonomy, Diversity, and Distribution
The main focus of our study was to detect and compare fungal DNA present in environmental samples obtained at different depths from four locations in the Southern Ocean. Few studies of fungal diversity in marine sediments of the Southern Ocean are available to date [2], with the majority of those based on traditional cultivation techniques which revealed the presence of relatively few taxa [15,16,30,31,32,33]. Lopez-Garcia et al. [34] used phylogenetic information from ribosomal RNA genes directly amplified from the environment to assess the biota present in the deep-sea environment, but they detected only one unidentified fungal taxon in the aphotic zone between 250 m and 3000 m depths south of the Antarctic Polar Front.
Many factors, including extraction, PCR and primer bias, can affect the number of reads obtained [35] and thus lead to misinterpretation of absolute abundance [36]. However, Giner et al. [37] concluded that such biases did not affect the proportionality between reads and cell abundance, implying that more reads are linked with higher abundance [38,39]. Therefore, for comparative purposes, we used the number of reads as a proxy for relative abundance. The data generated in the current study, using an up-to-date HTS approach, focused exclusively on the detection of fungal DNA in environmental samples, provide a striking contrast with the previous reports. Ogaki et al. [15] assessed the same samples to recover culturable fungi. Using different established culturing techniques (six culture media, incubations under normal atmospheric pressure, with three different inoculation methods and under aerobic and anaerobic conditions), Ogaki et al. [15] recovered only taxa of the genera Acremonium, Penicillium and Pseudogymnoascus. In contrast, our sequence data obtained using metabarcoding indicated the potential presence of a rich and diverse fungal community in marine sediments from all depths sampled, including multiple taxa not previously reported from Antarctica. The dominant fungal taxa detected in our study included representatives of genera often reported in different Antarctic environments, including Mortierella, Penicillium, Cladosporium, Pseudogymnoascus and Phaeosphaeria [40,41,42]. More unusual taxa such as the species Torula hollandica were included among the dominant group and as intermediate or rare taxa.
The genus Mortierella (Mortierellomycota) includes taxa commonly detected in Antarctica and abundant in association with plants [32,43,44,45], lichens [46], and also recovered from soil [47,48], freshwater lakes [49] and the thalli of marine macroalgae [50]. Representatives of Cladosporium and Penicillium included many cosmopolitan species and are often reported in Antarctic ecosystems. Cladosporium species are dominant in different soil types and in association with Antarctic plants [42]. Penicillium is widespread across Antarctica, occurring in many different ecosystems and habitats such as soils [48,51,52], permafrost [53,54], associated with marine macroalgae [50], snow [55], ice [56] and air [57]. Pseudogymnoascus species have been recorded from many different cold environments in Arctic, alpine, temperate and Antarctic regions [42,58,59,60]. They have been detected in soils [48,58,61,62], associated with plants [43,44,63], marine macroalgae [64,65], lichens [46] and in freshwater lakes [49]. Phaeosphaeria includes species known to be phytopathogenic and frequently recovered from tissues of Antarctic plants [41,63], lichens [66] and in soil [67]. Representatives of Phaeosphaeria have also been isolated from the Antarctic marine environment from thalli of the macroalga Adenocystis utricularis [64]. Torula (Torulaceae) includes species frequently found in association with plants, such as Torula hollandica that was originally isolated from a dead stem of Delphinium sp. in the Netherlands [68]; however, there are no reports of its presence in marine environments.
Some of these dominant fungi have previously been detected in Antarctic marine sediments. Using traditional culturing methods, Gonçalves et al. [16] recovered only Penicillium solitum from sediments sampled at 100 m, 500 m, 700 m and 1100 m depths. Ogaki et al. [15] recovered 31 cultured fungal isolates identified as taxa of Acremonium, Penicillium and Pseudogymnoascus from the same cores and depths sampled in the current study. However, the overall diversity recorded by Ogaki et al. [15] was low; at 153 m, only Pseudogymnoascus verrucosus was recorded; at 250 m only Penicillium allii-sativi; at 550 m Acremonium fusidioides, P. allii-sativi, P. chrysogenum, P. palitans and P. solitum; and at 1463 m only P. solitum. The HTS approach used here detected a considerably greater diversity of fungal taxa. The dominance of these genera in marine sediments at different depths also suggests that they are able to resist and survive the multiple extreme environmental stresses of the Southern Ocean. Our diversity results are consistent with the findings of Raghukumar et al. [69], who suggested that the majority of fungi detected in deep-sea sediments are similar to those present in the terrestrial environment, indicating the possibility of connectivity between these two environments, possibly mediated by either aerial dispersal or terrestrial runoff.
The DNA of an unexpectedly rich and diverse fungal community comprising intermediate and rare taxa was also detected in the deep-sea sediments examined and thus included unusual taxa for Antarctica, such as members of the genera Amyloxenasma, Articulospora, Arxiella, Byssocorticium, Calvatia, Clitopilus, Clonostachys, Crepidotus, Crocicreas, Emericellopsis, Hyphodiscus, Kotlabaea, Lasiodiplodia, Mycocentrospora, Mycoleptodiscus, Naganishia, Pseudopithomyces, Pyrenochaetopsis, Rhizoscyphus, Schizopora, Schwanniomyces, Setophoma, Tranzscheliella, Trechispora and Tulostoma. This diversity includes taxa distributed across terrestrial and marine environments globally and that perform multiple different ecological roles. These include decomposers, symbionts, plant, animal and human pathogens and Ingoldian fungi. Furthermore, included within the diversity detected was the DNA of taxa able to produce metabolites useful in biotechnological processes such as Beauveria amorpha [70], Clonostachys rosea [71] and Wickerhamomyces anomalus [72].
Ecological Profile
Antarctic fungi perform many different ecological roles including as saprophytes, mutualists, symbionts and/or parasites. However, perhaps the key ecological roles of Antarctic fungi are related to their capability to degrade organic matter at low temperature, releasing carbon, nitrogen and other elements to other organisms [73]. Among the fungal taxa detected in the deep-sea marine sediments examined here, saprophytes were the most common trophic guild, followed by plant and animal pathogens and symbionts. These results suggest that Antarctic deep-sea marine sediment habitat might host complex microbial ecosystems. However, as our study focused on fungal detection by quantifying the presence of DNA, further detailed studies will be necessary to elucidate the ecology of marine deep-sea fungi present in the Southern Ocean.
Conclusions
Compared with the few previous studies available based on traditional culturing methods [15,16,30,32,33], the metabarcoding approach applied here revealed that deep-sea sediments may represent a hotspot of fungal diversity in Antarctica, including possible new taxa of different hierarchical levels, new records or endemic species. The DNA detected included diverse fungal taxa, some with global distribution, with the dominant fungi similar to those present in terrestrial ecosystems. The diversity detected included fungal species with many different ecological roles suggesting that, despite the multiple extreme conditions characterizing the Southern Ocean, its deep-sea sediments may host a complex fungal community. However, detection of specific DNA sequences using metabarcoding does not confirm that living or viable organisms are present. Further studies are required to elucidate the taxonomy and ecological roles of the active fungi present, as well as to assess their metabolites and/or genes for potential use in biotechnological applications such as natural product discovery for use in medicine and agriculture.
Data Availability
All sediment samples analyzed in this paper are stored in the Laboratory of Microbiology at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
References
Sallée JB (2018) Southern Ocean warming. Oceanography 31:52–62
Ogaki MB, de Paula MT, Ruas D, Pellizzari FM, García-Laviña CX, Rosa LH (2019) Marine fungi associated with Antarctic macroalgae. In: Castro-Sowinski S (ed) The Ecological Role of Micro-organisms in the Antarctic Environment. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp 239–255
Dickinson I, Goodall-Copestake W, Thorne M, Schlitt T, Ávila-Jiménez M, Pearce D (2016) Extremophiles in an Antarctic marine ecosystem. Microorganisms 4:8
Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (1998) Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Acad Natl Sci USA 95:578–6583
Damare S, Raghukumar C, Raghukumar S (2006) Fungi in deep-sea sediments of 563 the Central Indian Basin. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap 53:14–27
Burgaud G, le Calvez T, Arzur D, Vandenkoornhuyse P, Barbier G (2009) Diversity of culturable marine filamentous fungi from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Environ Microbiol 11:1588–1600
Redou V et al (2015) Species richness and adaptation of marine fungi from deep-subseafloor sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:3571–3583
Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Leaño E, Pointing SB, Poonyth AD, Vrijmoed LLP (1998) Role of fungi in marine ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 7:1147–1161
Bass D, Howe A, Brown N, Barton H, Demidova M, Michelle H, Li L, Sanders H, Watkinson SC, Willcock S, Richards TA (2007) Yeast forms dominate fungal diversity in the deep oceans. Proc R Soc B 274:3069–3077
Takami et al (1997) Microbial flora in the deepest sea mud of the Mariana Trench. FEMS Microbiol Lett 152:279–285
Raghukumar C, Raghukumar S (1998) Barotolerance of fungi isolated from deep-sea sediments of the Indian Ocean. Aquat Microb Ecol 15:153–163
Edgcomb VP, Beaudoin D, Gast R, Biddle JF, Teske A (2011) Marine subsurface eukaryotes: the fungal majority. Environ Microbiol 13:172–183
Orsi W, Biddle JF, Edgcomb V (2013) Deep sequencing of subseafloor eukaryotic rRNA reveals active Fungi across marine subsurface provinces. PLoS One 2:e56335
Zhang X, Tang GL, Xu XY, Nong XH, Qi SH (2014) Insights into deep-sea sediment fungal communities from the East Indian Ocean using targeted environmental sequencing combined with traditional cultivation. PLoS One 9:e109118
Ogaki et al (2020) Cultivable fungi present in deep-sea sediments of Antarctica: taxonomy, diversity, and bioprospecting of bioactive compounds. Extremophiles 4:227–238
Gonçalves VN, Campos LS, Melo IS, Pellizari VH, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2013) Penicillium solitum: a mesophilic, psychrotolerant fungus present in marine sediments from Antarctica. Polar Biol 36:1823–1831
Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, Shi L, Zhu Y, Ma X, Gao T, Pang X, Luo K, Li Y, Li X, Jia X, Lin Y, Leon C (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 5:e8613
Richardson RT, Lin CH, Sponsler DB, Quijia JO, Goodell K, Johnson RM (2015) Application of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem. Appl Plant Sci 3:1400066
White TJ et al (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322
Joshi NA, Fass JN (2011) Sickle: a sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (version 1.33) [software]. https://github.com/najoshi/sickle
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koester I, Kosciolek T, Kreps J, Langille MGI, Lee J, Ley R, Liu YX, Loftfield E, Lozupone C, Maher M, Marotz C, Martin BD, McDonald D, McIver LJ, Melnik AV, Metcalf JL, Morgan SC, Morton JT, Naimey AT, Navas-Molina JA, Nothias LF, Orchanian SB, Pearson T, Peoples SL, Petras D, Preuss ML, Pruesse E, Rasmussen LB, Rivers A, Robeson II MS, Rosenthal P, Segata N, Shaffer M, Shiffer A, Sinha R, Song SJ, Spear JR, Swafford AD, Thompson LR, Torres PJ, Trinh P, Tripathi A, Turnbaugh PJ, Ul-Hasan S, van der Hooft JJJ, Vargas F, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Vogtmann E, von Hippel M, Walters W, Wan Y, Wang M, Warren J, Weber KC, Williamson CHD, Willis AD, Xu ZZ, Zaneveld JR, Zhang Y, Zhu Q, Knight R, Caporaso JG (2019) Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583
Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, Huttley GA, Gregory Caporaso J (2018) Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6:90
Abarenkov K et al (2020) UNITE QIIME release for eukaryotes. Version 04.02.2020. UNITE community. https://doi.org/10.15156/BIO/786386
Kirk et al (2011) Dictionary of the Fungi10th edn. CAB International, Wallingford, p 784
Tedersoo et al (2018) High-level classification of the Fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses. Fungal Divers 90:135–159
Hammer et al (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9
Bardou P, Mariette J, Escudié F, Djemiel C, Klopp C (2014) An interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinform 15:293
Nguyen NH, Song Z, Bates ST, Branco S, Tedersoo L, Menke J, Schilling JS, Kennedy PG (2016) FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol 20:241–248
Vaz AB et al (2011) The diversity, extracellular enzymatic activities and photoprotective compounds of yeasts isolated in Antarctica. Braz J Microbiol 42:937–947
Laich F, Vaca I, Chavez R (2013) Rhodotorula portillonensis sp. nov., a basidiomycetous yeast isolated from Antarctic shallow-water marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:3884–3891
Gonçalves VN, Carvalho CR, Johann S, Mendes G, Alves TMA, Zani CL, Junior PAS, Murta SMF, Romanha AJ, Cantrell CL, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2015) Antibacterial, antifungal and antiprotozoal activities of fungal communities present in different substrates from Antarctica. Polar Biol 38:1143–1152
Wentzel LCP, Inforsato FJ, Montoya QV, Rossin BG, Nascimento NR, Rodrigues A, Sette LD (2019) Fungi from admiralty bay (King George Island, Antarctica) soils and marine sediments. Microb Ecol 77:12–24
Lopez-Garcia P, Rodriguez-Valera F, Pedros-Allo C, Moreira D (2001) Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton. Nature 409:603–607
Medinger R et al (2010) Diversity in a hidden world: potential and limitation of next-generation sequencing for surveys of molecular diversity of eukaryotic microorganisms. Mol Ecol 19:32–40
Weber AA, Pawlowski J (2013) Can abundance of protists be inferred from sequence data: a case study of Foraminifera. PLoS One 8:e56739
Giner CR, Forn I, Romac S, Logares R, de Vargas C, Massana R (2016) Environmental sequencing provides reasonable estimates of the relative abundance of specific picoeukaryotes. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:4757–4766
Deiner K, Bik HM, Mächler E, Seymour M, Lacoursière-Roussel A, Altermatt F, Creer S, Bista I, Lodge DM, Vere N, Pfrender ME, Bernatchez L (2017) Environmental DNA metabarcoding: transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol Ecol 26:5872–5895
Hering D, Borja A, Jones JI, Pont D, Boets P, Bouchez A, Bruce K, Drakare S, Hänfling B, Kahlert M, Leese F, Meissner K, Mergen P, Reyjol Y, Segurado P, Vogler A, Kelly M (2018) Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive. Water Res 138:192–205
Ruisi et al (2007) Fungi in Antarctica. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 6:127–141
Rosa LH, Vaz ABM, Caligiorne RB, Campolina S, Rosa CA (2009) Endophytic fungi associated with the Antarctic grass Deschampsia antarctica Desv. (Poaceae). Polar Biol 32:161–167
Rosa LH, Zani CL, Cantrell CL, Duke SO, van Dijck P, Desideri A, Rosa CA (2019) Fungi in Antarctica: diversity, ecology, effects of climate change, and bioprospection for bioactive compounds. In: Rosa LH (ed) Fungi of Antarctica: diversity, Ecology and Biotechnological Applications. Springer, Cham, pp 1–18
Tosi S, Casado B, Gerdol R (2002) Fungi isolated from Antarctic mosses. Polar Biol 25:262–268
Carvalho CR et al (2020) Fungi associated with the biosphere of the bipolar mosses Polytrichastrum alpinum and Polytrichum juniperinum in Antarctica. Polar Biol 43:545–553
Rosa LH, de Sousa JRP, de Menezes GCA, da Costa Coelho L, Carvalho-Silva M, Convey P, Câmara PEAS (2020a) Opportunistic fungal assemblages present on fairy rings spread on different moss species in the Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 43:587–596
Santiago IF, Soares MA, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2015) Lichenosphere: a protected natural microhabitat of the non-lichenised fungal communities living in extreme environments of Antarctica. Extremophiles 19:1087–1097
Bridge PD, Newsham KK (2009) Soil fungal community composition at Mars Oasis, a southern maritime Antarctic site, assessed by PCR amplification and cloning. Fungal Ecol 2:66–74
Gomes EC et al (2018) Cultivable fungi present in Antarctic soils: taxonomy, phylogeny, diversity, and bioprospecting of antiparasitic and herbicidal metabolites. Extremophiles 22:381–393
Gonçalves VN, Vaz ABM, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2012) Diversity and distribution of fungal communities in lakes of Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 82:459–471
Godinho VM, Furbino LE, Santiago IF, Pellizzari FM, Yokoya NS, Pupo D, Alves TMA, S Junior PA, Romanha AJ, Zani CL, Cantrell CL, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2013) Diversity and bioprospecting of fungal communities associated with endemic and cold-adapted macroalgae in Antarctica. ISME J 7:1434–1451
McRae CF, Hocking AD, Seppelt RD (1999) Penicillium species from terrestrial habitats in the Windmill Islands, East Antarctica, including a new species, Penicillium antarcticum. Polar Biol 21:97–111
Godinho VM, Gonçalves VN, Santiago IF, Figueredo HM, Vitoreli GA, Schaefer CEGR, Barbosa EC, Oliveira JG, Alves TMA, Zani CL, Junior PAS, Murta SMF, Romanha AJ, Kroon EG, Cantrell CL, Wedge DE, Duke SO, Ali A, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2015) Diversity and bioprospection of fungal community present in oligotrophic soil of continental Antarctica. Extremophiles 19:585–596
Zucconi L, Selbmann L, Buzzini P, Turchetti B, Guglielmin M, Frisvad JC, Onofri S (2012) Searching for eukaryotic life preserved in Antarctic permafrost. Polar Biol 35:749–757
da Silva TH, Silva DAS, de Oliveira FS, Schaefer CEGR, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2020) Diversity, distribution, and ecology of viable fungi in permafrost and active layer of Maritime Antarctica. Extremophiles 24:565–576
de Menezes GCA, Amorim SS, Gonçalves VN, Godinho VM, Simões JC, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2019) Diversity, distribution, and ecology of fungi in the seasonal snow of Antarctica. Microorganisms 7:445
de Menezes GCA, Porto BA, Amorim SS, Zani CL, de Almeida Alves TM, Junior PAS, Murta SMF, Simões JC, Cota BB, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2020) Fungi in glacial ice of Antarctica: diversity, distribution and bioprospecting of bioactive compounds. Extremophiles 24:367–376
Rosa LH et al (2020b) DNA metabarcoding high-throughput sequencing of fungal diversity in air and snow of Livingston Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Sci Rep in press
Mercantini R, Marsella R, Cervellati MC (1989) Keratinophilic fungi isolated from Antarctic soil. Mycopathologia 106:47–52
Lorch JM, Lindner DL, Gargas A, Muller LK, Minnis AM, Blehert DS (2013) A culture-based survey of fungi in soil from bat hibernacula in the eastern United States and its implications for detection of Geomyces destructans, the causal agent of bat white-nose syndrome. Mycologia 105:237–252
Minnis AM, Lindner DL (2013) Phylogenetic evaluation of Geomyces and allies reveals no close relatives of Pseudogymnoascus destructans, comb. nov., in bat hibernacula of eastern North America. Fungal Biol 117:638–649
Arenz BE, Blanchette RA (2011) Distribution and abundance of soil fungi in Antarctica at sites on the Peninsula, Ross Sea Region and McMurdo Dry Valleys. Soil Biol Biochem 43:308–315
Krishnan A, Alias SA, Wong CMVL, Pang KL, Convey P (2011) Extracellular hydrolase enzyme production by soil fungi from King George Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 34:1535–1542
Rosa LH, Almeida Vieira Mde L, Santiago IF, Rosa CA (2010) Endophytic fungi community associated with the dicotyledonous plant Colobanthus quitensis (Kunth) Bartl. (Caryophyllaceae) in Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:178–189
Loque CP, Medeiros AO, Pellizzari FM, Oliveira EC, Rosa CA, Rosa LH (2010) Fungal community associated with marine macroalgae from Antarctica. Polar Biol 33:641–648
Furbino LE, Godinho VM, Santiago IF, Pellizari FM, Alves TMA, Zani CL, Junior PAS, Romanha AJ, Carvalho AGO, Gil LHVG, Rosa CA, Minnis AM, Rosa LH (2014) Diversity patterns, ecology and biological activities of fungal communities associated with the endemic macroalgae across the Antarctic. Microb Ecol 67:775–787
Moller C, Dreyfuss MM (1996) Microfungi from Antarctic lichens, mosses and vascular plants. Mycologia 88:922–933
Connell L, Redman R, Craig S, Rodriguez R (2006) Distribution and abundance of fungi in the soils of Taylor Valley, Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3083–3094
Crous PW, Carris LM, Giraldo A, Groenewald JZ, Hawksworth DL, Hemández-Restrepo M, Jaklitsch WM, Lebrun MH, Schumacher RK, Stielow JB, van der Linde EJ, Vilcāne J, Voglmayr H, Wood AR (2015) The genera of Fungi - fixing the application of the type species of generic names-G 2: Allantophomopsis, Latorua, Macrodiplodiopsis, Macrohilum, Milospium, Protostegia, Pyricularia, Robillarda, Rotula, Septoriella, Torula, and Wojnowicia. IMA Fungus 6:163–198
Raghukumar C, Samir DR, Singh P (2010) A review on deep-sea fungi: occurrence, diversity and adaptations. Bot Mar 53:479–492
Hu F, Schmidt K, Stoyanova S, Zengzhi L, Gräfe U, Hamburger M (2002) Radical scavengers from the entomogenous deuteromycete Beauveria amorpha. Planta Med 68:64–65
Rodríguez MA, Cabrera G, Gozzo FC, Eberlin MN, Godeas A (2011) Clonostachys rosea BAFC3874 as a Sclerotinia sclerotiorum antagonist: mechanisms involved and potential as a biocontrol agent. J Appl Microbiol 110:1177–1186
Schwentke J, Sabel A, Petri A, König H, Claus H (2014) The yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus AS1 secretes a multifunctional exo-β-1,3-glucanase with implications for winemaking. Yeast 31:349–359
Schütte UME, Henning JA, Ye Y, Bowling A, Ford J, Genet H, Waldrop MP, Turetsky MR, White JR, Bever JD (2019) Effect of permafrost thaw on plant and soil fungal community in a boreal forest: does fungal community change mediate plant productivity response? J Ecol 107:1737–1752
Acknowledgments
We thank congresswoman Jô Moraes and the Biological Sciences Institute of the University of Brasilia.
Funding
This study received financial support from the CNPq, PROANTAR, FAPEMIG, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES), INCT Criosfera 2. P. Convey is supported by NERC core funding to the British Antarctic Survey’s “Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation” Team.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
The collections and studies performed in Antarctic Peninsula were authorized by the Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty and by PROANTAR.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogaki, M.B., Pinto, O.H.B., Vieira, R. et al. Fungi Present in Antarctic Deep-Sea Sediments Assessed Using DNA Metabarcoding. Microb Ecol 82, 157–164 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01658-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01658-8