Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technological factors of students’ persistence in online courses in higher education: The moderating role of gender, age and prior online course experience

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify if technological factors have an influence on persistence in online courses. A theoretical model encompassing seven variables was tested, some of them borrowed from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, attitude, anxiety and persistence in online courses. Three moderating variables (gender, age and prior online course experience) were also considered in the analyses. Data were collected among a sample of 430 students using an online questionnaire. The obtained results strongly support 6 of the 9 research hypotheses for the proposed model. Correlations revealed significant associations between persistence in online courses on the one hand and performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, attitude, and anxiety on the other hand. A series of multiple linear regressions examined the predictability of persistence in online courses by the technological factors considered in the study for the whole sample, and for each gender, age and prior online course experience group. They showed that these factors explained 18.9% to 45.7% of the variability in persistence in online courses. The discussion focuses on how different technological factors explain persistence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdous, M. H. (2019). Influence of satisfaction and preparedness on online students’ feelings of anxiety. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adachi, C., Tai, J. H. M., & Dawson, P. (2018a). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adachi, C., Tai, J. H. M., & Dawson, P. (2018b). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, I, E. & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Sloan consortium. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf

  • Allen, I, E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T, T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from: http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf

  • Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). System, scholar or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arhin, V., & Wang’eri, T. (2018). Orientation programs and student retention in distance learning: The case of University of Cape Coast. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2010). The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Euan, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozionelos, N. (2004). Socio-economic background and computer use: The role of computer anxiety and computer experience in their relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(5), 725–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. M. (2014). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses’ continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. M., & Wang, E. T. (2008). Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45(3), 194–201.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. H. (2012). Online student orientation in higher education: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1051–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Rinehart and Winston, Orlando: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Damnjanovic, V., Jednak, S., & Mijatovic, I. (2015). Factors affecting the effectiveness and use of Moodle: students’ perception. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 496–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T., Bates, T., Seaman, J., Mayer, D., Martel, E., Paul, R., et al. (2019). Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges: 2018. Vancouver BC: Canadian Digital Learning Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 743–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazza, E. A., & Hunker, D. F. (2014). Facilitating student retention in online graduate nursing education programs: A review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 34(7), 1125–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & Van Osdel, J. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 609–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C. W., & Conway, K. M. (2014). Do prior online course outcomes provide more information than G.P.a. alone in predicting subsequent online course grades and retention? An observational study at an urban community college. Computers & Education, 72, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, M. (2006). Staying the course: A study in online student satisfaction and retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(4). Retrieved from: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter94/herbert94.htm

  • Hsu, Y.-C., Shiue, Y.-M., & Sheng, M.-H. (2016). Continuous intention formation in E-tutoring system: Examining the roles of self-determined motivators, social and technological influences. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Materials for Science and Engineering IEEE-ICAMSE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAMSE.2016.7840276.

  • Islam, A. N. (2013). Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context. Computers & Education, 69, 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, A. N., & Azad, N. (2015). Satisfaction and continuance with a learning management system: Comparing perceptions of educators and students. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 32(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, Y. J., Joung, S., & Sim, W. J. (2011a). Structural relationships among internal locus of control, institutional support, flow, and learner persistence in cyber universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 714–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011b). Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1654–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1989). A longitudinal-process model of drop-out from distance education. Journal of Higher Education, 60(3), 278–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khechine, H., & Lakhal, S. (2015). Effects of webinar use on student performance in higher education: What about grades? In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martińez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN15 Proceedings (pp. 329–337). Barcelona: IATED.

  • Khechine, H., & Lakhal, S. (2018). Technology as a double-edged sword: From behavior prediction with UTAUT to students’ outcomes considering personal characteristics. Journal of Information Technology Education, 17(1), 63–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Bytha, A., & Pascot, D. (2014). UTAUT model for blended learning: The role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10(1), 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., & Ndjambou, P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model: Eleven years later. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 33(2), 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, S. (2015). Retention of community college students in online courses. Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan: Western Michigan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranzow, J. (2013). Faculty leadership in online education: Structuring courses to impact student satisfaction and persistence. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhal, S. (2019). Les déterminants technologiques de la persévérance des étudiants dans les cours à distance de niveau collégial: Les modalités de cours jouent-elles un rôle? Revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie/Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 45(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhal, S., & Bazinet, N. (2015). Technological factors explaining student dropout from online courses in higher education: A review. In Carliner, S., Fulford, C., Ostashewski, N. (Eds.) Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1806–1811). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

  • Lakhal, S., & Khechine, H. (2017). Relating personality (big five) to the core constructs of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(3), 251–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhal, S., & Meyer, F. (2019). Blended learning. In A. Tatnall (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education and information technologies. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Pascot, D. (2013). Student behavioural intentions to use desktop video conferenc-ing in a distance course: Integration of autonomy to the UTAUT model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(2), 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2017). Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Kim, T. (2013). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. M. (2011). E-learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experience. Computers & Education, 56(2), 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. M., Chen, N. S., & Fang, K. (2011). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: A negative critical incidents perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lint, A. H. (2013). E-learning student perceptions on scholarly persistence in the 21st century with social media in higher education. Creative Education, 4(11), 718–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44(2), 501–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyd, B. H., Loyd, D. E., & Gressard, C. P. (1987). Gender and computer experience as factors in the computer attitudes of middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 7(1), 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmodi, M., & Ebrahimzade, I. (2015). The analysis of Iranian students’ persistence in online education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(1), 98–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcilroy, D., Sadler, C., & Boojawon, N. (2007). Computer phobia and computer self-efficacy: Their association with undergraduates’ use of university computer facilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1285–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. P., & Schiltz, P. M. (2012). Use of Elluminate in online teaching of statistics in the health sciences. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 5(1), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Y., Tang, C., Rong, W., Zhang, L., Yin, C., & Xiong, Z. (2017). Task-technology fit aware expectation-confirmation model towards understanding of MOOCs continued usage intention. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (2017), USA (pp. 174–183). https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.020.

  • Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., & Thomas, B. (2004). E-learning and retention: Key factors influencing student withdrawal. Education+ Training, 46(6/7), 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. (2007). Factors related to learner dropout in online learning. In F. M. Nafukho, T. H. Chermack, & C. M. Graham (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Conference, 25–1–25-8. Indianapolis, IN: AHRD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. L. (2013). Computer anxiety: Comparison of research from the 1990s and 2000s. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2337–2381.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow. Information & Management, 53(4), 504–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet & Higher Education, 6(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D. B., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 842–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiller, K. D., & Köster, A. (2016). Learner attrition in an advanced vocational online training: The role of computer attitude, computer anxiety, and online learning experience. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 19(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoessel, K., Ihme, T. A., Barbarino, M. L., Fisseler, B., & Stürmer, S. (2015). Sociodemographic diversity and distance education: Who drops out from academic programs and why? Research in Higher Education, 56(3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strevy, S. (2009). Persistence of students in RNBS completion online programs. Ph.D. dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, S., & Hagger, M. (2013). Psychological and socio-demographic correlates of academic performance distinguishing completers and non-completers in distance education. Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(2), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarhini, A., Masa’deh, R. E., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Mohammed, A. B., & Maqableh, M. (2017). Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2), 164–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R., Higgins, C., & Howell, J. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.-K., & Hsu, H.-Y. (2008). Use of the webinar tool to support training: The effects of webinar-learning implementation from trainers’ perspective. Journal of Online Interactive Learning, 7(3), 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., & Zhang, C. (2014). Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-learning 2.0 systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1027–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Shao, Z., Liu, Q., & Liu, C. (2017). Understanding the quality factors that influence the continuance intention of students toward participation in MOOCs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1195–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Coping with negative emotions in purchase-related situations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S. J., & Huang, W. D. (2013). Engaging online adult learners in higher education: Motivational factors impacted by gender, age, and prior experiences. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61(3), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pedagogy, Université de Sherbrooke, room A10-3008, Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1K 2R1, Canada

    Sawsen Lakhal

  2. Department of Management Information Systems, Université Laval, room PAP-1515, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada

    Hager Khechine

Authors
  1. Sawsen Lakhal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hager Khechine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sawsen Lakhal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals: this research involved human participants.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from participants before data collection.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lakhal, S., Khechine, H. Technological factors of students’ persistence in online courses in higher education: The moderating role of gender, age and prior online course experience. Educ Inf Technol 26, 3347–3373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10407-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10407-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation