Skip to main content
Log in

Direct and indirect effects of SEWi, family human capital and social capital on organizational social capital in small family firms

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the importance of social capital in organizations, this research answers the question of how socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi), family human capital and family social capital influence organizational social capital in small family firms. Based on a sample of 334 small family businesses from the Biobío Region in Chile, a partial least squares structural equation modeling analysis (PLS-SEM) was performed. The results do not provide support for the predicted direct influence of family social capital on organizational social capital, but they support an indirect influence through SEWi and family human capital, both of which have a direct and positive influence on family firms’ organizational social capital. This means that SEWi and family human capital play a central role in generating organizational social capital in small family firms. It also suggests that both ability and willingness of family businesses play a role in allowing these firms to successfully transfer social capital from the family to the business system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso Dos Santos, M., & Llanos Contreras, O. (2018). Exploring the asymmetric influence of socioemotional wealth priorities on entrepreneurial behaviour in family businesses. European Journal of International Management, 12(5/6), 576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Dos-Santos, M., & Llanos-Contreras, O. (2019). Family business performance in a post-disaster scenario: the influence of socioemotional wealth importance and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 101, 492–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J.-L., Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Webb, J. W., Miller, T., & Tsui, A. S. (2015). Family ties in entrepreneurs’ social networks and new venture growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 313–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J. L., Duran, P., Hitt, M. A., & van Essen, M. (2017). Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(5), 801–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrachan, C. B., Patel, V. K., & Wanzenried, G. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, C. E., Bruton, G. D., & Hinson, Y. L. (2006). Founder/chief executive officer exit: a social capital perspective of new ventures. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bika, Z., & Frazer, M. L. (2020). The affective extension of ‘family’ in the context of changing elite business networks. Human Relations., 001872672092407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720924074

  • Chirico, F., & Salvato, C. (2016). Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: when relational and affective factors matter. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 40(1), 201–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C., & Justo, R. (2017). Portfolio entrepreneurship as a mixed gamble: a winning bet for family entrepreneurs in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(4), 571–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C., Justo, R., & De Castro, J. O. (2012). Does family employment enhance MSEs performance?. Integrating socioemotional wealth and family embeddedness perspectives. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daspit, J. J., Chrisman, J. J., Sharma, P., Pearson, A. W., & Mahto, R. V. (2018). Governance as a source of family firm heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.041

  • Dawson, A. (2012). Human capital in family businesses: Focusing on the individual level. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debicki, B. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., Pearson, A. W., & Spencer, B. A. (2016). Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faghfouri, P., Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). Ready for a crisis? How supervisory boards affect the formalized crisis procedures of small and medium-sized family firms in Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 9(2), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. L., & Reay, T. (2015). Sustaining the family business with minimal financial rewards: how do family farms continue? Family Business Review, 28(2), 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Takács Haynes, K., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish olive oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Patel, P. C., & Zellweger, T. M. (2018). In the horns of the dilemma: socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1369–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L., Basco, R., Gonzalez, A. C., & Muller, C. G. (2020). Family business and local development in Iberoamerica. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, 27(1), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: an inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 294–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Joseph F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Partial least squares: The better approach to structural equation modeling? Long Range Planning, 45(5–6): 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.011

  • Hair, J., Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Carrión, C., Camarero-Izquierdo, C., & Gutiérrez-Cillán, J. (2017). Entrepreneurs’ social capital and the economic performance of small businesses: The moderating role of competitive intensity and entrepreneurs’ experience. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, I. (2018). How familial is family social capital? Analyzing bonding social Capital in family and Nonfamily Firms. Family Business Review, 31(4), 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, I., & Hughes, M. (2019). When family social capital is too much of a good thing. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(3), 100271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski, K. M., Carr, J. C., & Baron, R. A. (2015). Integrating discovery and creation perspectives of entrepreneurial action: the relative roles of founding CEO human capital, social capital, and psychological Capital in Contexts of risk versus uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(4), 289–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, J. W. J., & Gomez-Solorzano, M. (2019). Social tie heterogeneity and firms’ networking strategy. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 43(2) 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796074

  • Kansikas, J., Laakkonen, A., Sarpo, V., & Kontinen, T. (2012). Entrepreneurial leadership and familiness as resources for strategic entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(2), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leana and Van Buren. (1999). Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3):538–555.

  • Llanos-Contreras, O. A., & Jabri, M. (2019). Exploring family business decline with socioemotional wealth perspective. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administracion, 32(1), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanos-Contreras, O., Jabri, M., & Sharma, P. (2019). Temporality and the role of shocks in explaining changes in socioemotional wealth and entrepreneurial orientation of small and medium family enterprises. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1269–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanos-Contreras, O., Alonso-Dos-Santos, M., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2020a). Entrepreneurship and risk-taking in a post-disaster scenario. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(1), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanos-Contreras, O., Arias, J., & Maquieira, C. (2020b). Risk taking behavior in Chilean listed family firms: a socioemotional wealth approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00628-y

  • Mani, Y., & Lakhal, L. (2015). Exploring the family effect on firm performance: the impact of internal social capital dimensions on family firm performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 21(6), 898–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Xu, X., & Mehrotra, V. (2015). When is human capital a valuable resource? The performance effects of Ivy league selection among celebrated CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 930–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: a longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(6), 909–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musteen, M., Ahsan, M., & Park, T. (2017). SMEs, intellectual capital, and offshoring of service activities: an empirical investigation. Management International Review, 57(4), 603–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nason, R., Mazzelli, A., & Carney, M. (2019). The ties that unbind: Socialization and business-owning family reference point shift. Academy of Management Review, 44(4): 846–870. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0289

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1985). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. B: Harvard University Press.

  • Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modelling, helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: a social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(6 SPEC. ISS.), 949–969.

  • Powell, G. N., & Eddleston, K. A. (2013). Linking family-to-business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: Do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. http://www.smartpls.com

  • Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. Steenkamp, & M. Raisinghani (Eds.), Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems (pp. 193–221). Hershey, PA.: IGI Global.

  • Sanchez-Famoso, V., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2015). The influence of family and non-family social capital on firm innovation: Exploring the role of family ownership. European Journal of International Management, 9(2), 240–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. (2008). Commentary: Familiness: Capital stocks and flows between family and business. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(6): 971–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00266.x

  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. P. (2020). Family firm behavior from a psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 44(1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719879675

  • Sorenson, R. L., & Bierman, L. (2009). Family capital, family business, and free enterprise. Family Business Review, 22(3), 193–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3): 450–463. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159670

  • Tata, J., & Prasad, S. (2015). Immigrant family businesses: social capital, network benefits and business performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 21(6), 842–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A. P., Marshall, M. I., & Sydnor, S. (2019). Does social capital pay off? The case of small business resilience after hurricane Katrina. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 27(2), 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, D. H. B., & Kaciak, E. (2018). Women’s entrepreneurship: a model of business-family interface and performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(3), 627–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, D. H. B., & Kaciak, E. (2019). Family enrichment and women entrepreneurial success: the mediating effect of family interference. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1045–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15(1), 23–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Baier-Fuentes.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Llanos-Contreras, O., Baier-Fuentes, H. & González-Serrano, M.H. Direct and indirect effects of SEWi, family human capital and social capital on organizational social capital in small family firms. Int Entrep Manag J 18, 1403–1418 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00725-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00725-3

Keywords

Navigation