Abstract
Appropriate placement of synchrophasor meters will save huge capital investment and give improved wide area monitoring, control, and protection. Being costly and having flexible channel capacity, the synchrophasor meters should be placed judiciously in the network to avoid unnecessary expenses. In this paper, the practical cost assessment of phasor measurement unit (PMU) placement has been done for different placement strategies considering different network contingencies for the first time. Cost study has further been investigated for the placement strategies in the presence/absence of dual-use line relays (DULRs). Different combinations of synchrophasor measurement meters (PMU and DULR) along with channel limitation property of the meters have been utilized to minimize the cost of observability. Modified Binary Symbiotic Organisms Search (MBSOS) has been used for the first time to solve the optimal PMU placement (OPP) problem. The simulated results show that the proposed method can give techno-economical solutions for various synchrophasor meter placement (SMP) strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All resources are gathered from strong references which are mentioned in the text as well as in the reference list.
References
Abualigah LMQ (2019) Feature selection and enhanced krill herd algorithm for text document clustering. Studies in Computational Intelligence 816, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
Abualigah LM, Khader AT, Hanandeh ES (2018a) Hybrid clustering analysis using improved krill herd algorithm. Appl Intell 48:4047–4071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1190-6
Abualigah LM, Khader AT, Hanandeh ES (2018b) A new feature selection method to improve the document clustering using particle swarm optimization algorithm. J Comput Sci 25:456–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2017.07.018
Arqub OA, Al-Smadi M (2020) Fuzzy conformable fractional differential equations: novel extended approach and new numerical solutions. Soft Comput 24:12501–12522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04687-0
Arqub OA, AL-SmadiS, M, Momani S et al (2016) Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations using reproducing kernel Hilbert space method. Soft Comput 20:3283–3302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-1707-4
Arqub OA, Al-Smadi M, Momani S et al (2017) Application of reproducing kernel algorithm for solving second-order, two-point fuzzy boundary value problems. Soft Comput 21:7191–7206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2262-3
Baldwin TL, Mili L, Boisen MB Jr, Adapa R (1993) Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8:707–715
Basetti V, Chandel AK, Subramanyam KBVSR (2018) Power system static state estimation using JADE-adaptive differential evolution technique. Soft Comput 22:7157–7176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2715-3
Bei X, Ali A (2004) Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs. IEEE PES power systems conference and exposition, New York, USA, pp 943–946
Bei X, Ali A (2005) Optimal placement of phasor measurement units for state estimation. Final Project Report, Texas A&M University, PSERC Publication 05-58: 3–12
Chatterjee S, Saha Roy BK, Ghosh PK (2017) Optimal placement of PMU considering practical costs in wide area network. 14th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON)
Chatterjee S, Ghosh PK, Saha Roy BK (2019) PMU-based power system component monitoring scheme satisfying complete observability with multicriteria decision support. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 30:e12223
Cheng YM, Prayogo D (2014) Symbiotic organisms Search: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Struct 139:98–112
Fesharaki FH, Hooshmand RA, Khodabakhshian A (2013) A new method for simultaneous optimal placement of PMUs and PDCs for maximizing data transmission reliability along with providing the power system observability. Electric Power Syst Res 100:44–54
Gou B (2008) Generalized integer linear programming formulation for optimal PMU placement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23:1099–1104
Korres GN (2002) A robust method for equality constrained state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17:928
Korres GN, Katsikas PJ, Clements KA, Davis PW (2003) Numerical observability analysis based on network graph theory. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18:1035–1045
MatpowerDirectories (2016). http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/ref/matpower5.0/menu5.0.html. Retrieved 02.11.16
Miljanic Z et al (2012) Optimal placement of PMUs with limited number of channels. Electr Power Syst Res 90:93–98
Monticelli A, Wu FF (1986) Observability analysis for orthogonal transformation based state estimation. IEEE Power Eng Rev PER-6 45–45
Mouwafi MT et al (2016) Optimal placement of phasor measurement units with minimum availability of measuring channels in smart power systems. Electr Power Syst Res 141:421–431
Nucera RR, Gilles ML (1991) Observability analysis: a new topological algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 6:466–475
Nucera RR, Brandwajn V, Gilles ML (1993) Observability and bad data analysis using augmented blocked matrices [power system analysis computing]. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8:426–433
Nuqui RF, Phadke AG (2005) Phasor measurement unit placement techniques for complete and incomplete observability. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20:2381–2388
Pal A, Vullikanti SA, Ravi SS (2017) A PMU placement scheme considering realistic costs and modern trends in relaying. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32:552–561
Rashidi F et al (2015) Optimal placement of PMUs with limited number of channels for complete topological observability of power systems under various contingencies. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 67:125–137
Slutsker IW, Scudder JM (1987) Network observability analysis through measurement Jacobian matrix reduction. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2:331–336
Sodhi R, Srivastava SC, Shing SN (2010) Optimal PMU placement method for complete topological and numerical observability of power system. Electr Power Syst Res 80:1154–1159
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (2014) Factors affecting PMU installation costs. [Online]. https://www.smartgrid.gov/files/PMU-coststudyfinal-10162014_1.pdf
Wu FF, Liu WHE, Holten L et al (1988) Observability analysis and bad data processing for state estimation using hachtel’s augmented matrixmethod. IEEE Trans Power Syst 3:604–611
Funding
There are no such funds/grants involved in this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SC contributed to methodology, software, writing original draft, writing review and editing, data curation, conceptualization, investigation, validation, resources, project administration, format analysis, visualization, and supervision
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author does not have any conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Communicated by V. Loia.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chatterjee, S. Cost assessment of different SMP strategies considering network contingencies with MBSOS. Soft Comput 25, 4899–4905 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05498-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05498-z