Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impacts of Void Existence on Mechanical Behavior of Tuff-like Lithophysal Material

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current literature, the existence of lithophysae can cause a substantial change in the mechanical properties of tuff rock. However, since the shapes and distributions of the lithophysae are typically irregular and random, exploring the influence of lithophysae existence on the engineering behavior of lithophysae-rich tuff rock using the actual samples is very challenging. Besides, it is almost impossible to control the geometry of the lithophysae in the actual samples. Accordingly, in an attempt to explore the influence of void porosity and geometry on the mechanical behavior of tuff rocks, solid cubes as well as porous cubes with voids having different geometries were made of tuff-like material, Hydro-StoneTB®, and tested under uniaxial compression. The Hydro-StoneTB® was chosen because it resembled the tuff rocks in regards to strength and deformation under uniaxial stresses. The results showed that void geometry along with void porosity has a significant impact on the mechanical behavior of tuff-like lithophysal material. However, the mechanical behavior of the tuff-like lithophysal material mainly depends on the void porosity. The compressive strength values decreased with increased specimen void porosity. The strength/void porosity relationship is essentially exponential over the 6–20% void porosity range. The percent change in uniaxial compressive strength from the solid cube value is roughly 59, 72, and 82% at 6, 13, and 19.5% void porosity, respectively. Additionally, considering the smallest bridge distance could improve the description of the influences of the void geometry on the mechanical properties of the tuff -like lithophysal material. Furthermore, for the void porosity ranging from 6 to 20%, the crack patterns of the Hydro-StoneTB® porous cubes showed that the axial splittings (tension failures) are the dominant failure modes. However, based on the void alignments and bridge distances, shear failures can occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avar BB (2002) Numerical and experimental investigation of formation and strength properties of lithophysae-rich tuff and analog materials. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

  • Avar BB, Hudyma N, Karakouzian M (2003) Porosity dependence of the elastic modulus of lithophysae-rich tuff: numerical and experimental investigations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:919–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Standards, BS 1881 (1983) Testing concrete. Part 116: method for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes. British Standards Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • BSC (Bechtel SAIC Company) (2003) Subsurface geotechnical parameters report. 800-K0C-WIS0-00400-000-00A. Bechtel SAIC Company. ACC: ENG.20040108.0001, Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Costin LS, Price RH, Lee MY (2009) Characterization of a high lithophysal welded tuff unit using a multi-scale approach. In: Paper presented at international conference on rock joints and jointed rock masses, Univ. of Ariz., Tucson

  • Erfourth BS (2006) Characterization of the impact of spherical voids—regarding size, spatial distribution, and porosity—on engineering properties of rock and rock-like materials. M.Sc. Thesis 2006, Montana Tech of the University of Montana

  • Hudyma N, Avar BB, Karakouzian M (2004) Compressive strengths and failure modes of lithophysae-rich tuff specimens and analog models containing cavities. Eng Geol 73:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen C, MacLaughlin M, Hudyma N (2010) Strength, deformation modulus and failure modes of cubic analog specimens representing macroporous rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1349–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nott J (2009) Tensile strength and failure criterion of analog lithophysal rock. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

  • Palchik V (1999) Influence of Porosity and Elastic Modulus on Uniaxial Compressive Strength in Soft Brittle Porous Sandstones. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32(4):303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price RH (1983) Analysis of rock mechanics properties of volcanic tuff units from Yucca Mountain, Nevada Test Site. Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND82-1315. Albuquerque, NM

  • Price RH (2004) The mechanical properties of lithophysal tuff: laboratory experiments. TDREBS-MD-000027 Rev. 00. Bechtel SAIC Company, ACC: DOC.20040506.0001, Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Price RH, Nimick FB, Connolly JR, Keil K, Schwartz BM, Spence SJ (1985) Preliminary characterization of the petrologic, bulk, and mechanical properties of a lithophysal zone within the Topopah Spring member of the paintbrush tuff. Sandia National Laboratories, SAND84-0860. Albuquerque, NM

  • Rigby DB (2004) Lithophysal rock mass mechanical properties of the repository host horizon. DOE United States Government Identifier, 800-K0CSS00-00200-000-00A

  • Sammis CG, Ashby MF (1986) The failure of brittle porous solids under compressive stress states. Acta Metall 34(3):511–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoshenko S, Goodier JN (1951) Theory of elasticity, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 506

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the US Department of Energy and the Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water Resources Engineering Department, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimaniyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

    Omed S. Q. Yousif

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA

    Moses Karakouzian & Douglas B. Rigby

Authors
  1. Omed S. Q. Yousif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Moses Karakouzian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Douglas B. Rigby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The experimental measurements were developed by MK and DR; the specimens were tested by MK and DR; the data were analyzed, and the paper was written by OY; the manuscript was supervised and revised by MK. The manuscript has been read and accepted to be published by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omed S. Q. Yousif.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousif, O.S.Q., Karakouzian, M. & Rigby, D.B. Impacts of Void Existence on Mechanical Behavior of Tuff-like Lithophysal Material. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 1315–1330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02322-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02322-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation