Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of PCR-RFLP with 21-plex PCR and rDNA Sequencing for Identification of Clinical Yeast Isolates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-albicans Candida species and other rare yeasts have emerged as major opportunistic pathogens in fungal infections. Identification of opportunistic yeasts in developing countries is mainly performed by phenotypic assay, which are time-consuming and prone to errors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate PCR-RFLP as a routinely used identification technique for the most clinically important Candida species in Iran and make a comparison with a novel multiplex PCR, called 21-plex PCR. One hundred and seventy-three yeast isolates from clinical sources were selected and identified with sequence analysis of the D1/D2 domains of rDNA (LSU rDNA) sequencing as the gold standard method. The results were compared with those obtained by PCR-RFLP using MspI restriction enzyme and the 21-plex PCR. PCR-RFLP correctly identified 93.4% of common pathogenic Candida species (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and P. kudriavsevii (= C. krusei)) and was able to identify 45.5% of isolates of the uncommon yeast species compared to the D1/D2 rDNA sequencing. Compared with PCR-RFLP, all common Candida species and 72.7% of uncommon yeast species were correctly identified by the 21-plex PCR. The application of the 21-plex PCR assay as a non-sequence-based molecular method for the identification of common and rare yeasts can reduce turnaround time and costs for the identification of clinically important yeasts and can be applied in resource-limited settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lamoth F, Lockhart SR, Berkow EL, Calandra T. Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:i4–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salehi M, Ahmadikia K, Mahmoudi S, Kalantari S, Jamalimoghadamsiahkali S, Izadi A, et al. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in hospitalised COVID-19 patients from Iran: Species identification and antifungal susceptibility pattern. Mycoses. 2020;63(8):771–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fesharaki SH, Haghani I, Mousavi B, Kargar ML, Boroumand M, Anvari MS, et al. Endocarditis due to a co-infection of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis in a drug abuser. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(11):1763–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadrossadati SZ, Ghahri M, Fooladi AAI, Sayyahfar S, Beyraghi S, Baseri Z. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Candida species isolated from candideamia in Iran. Curr Med Mycol. 2018;4(2):14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Arastehfar A, Daneshnia F, Kord M, Roudbary M, Zarrinfar H, Fang W, et al. Comparison of 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX, MALDI-TOF MS, and rDNA sequencing for a wide range of clinically isolated yeast species: improved identification by combining 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX as an alternative strategy for developing countries. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Arastehfar A, Wickes BL, Ilkit M, Pincus DH, Daneshnia F, Pan W, et al. Identification of mycoses in developing countries. J Fungi. 2019;5(4):90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aslani N, Janbabaei G, Abastabar M, Meis JF, Babaeian M, Khodavaisy S, et al. Identification of uncommon oral yeasts from cancer patients by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahangarkani F, Shokohi T, Rezai MS, Ilkit M, Mahmoodi Nesheli H, Karami H, et al. Epidemiological features of nosocomial candidaemia in neonates, infants and children: a multicentre study in Iran. Mycoses. 2020;63(4):382–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jafari Z, Motamedi M, Jalalizand N. A comparison between CHROMagar, PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP for identification of Candida species. Curr Med Mycol. 2017;3(3):10–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Baghdadi E, Khodavaisy S, Rezaie S, Abolghasem S, Sharifynia S, Kiasat N, et al. Antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida species recovered from endotracheal tube biofilms in an intensive care unit. Adv Med. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9242031.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kord M, Salehi MR, Khodavaisy S, Hashemi SJ, Daei R, Rezaei S, et al. Epidemiology of yeast species causing bloodstream infection in Tehran, Iran (2015–2017); Superiority of 21-plex PCR over the Vitek 2 system for yeast identification. J Med Microbiol. 2020;69(5):712–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirhendi H, Makimura K, Khoramizadeh M, Yamaguchi H. A one-enzyme PCR-RFLP assay for identification of six medically important Candida species. Nippon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;47(3):225–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Munoz JF, Gade L, Chow NA, Loparev VN, Juieng P, Berkow EL, et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arastehfar A, Fang W, Badali H, Vaezi A, Jiang W, Liao W, et al. Low-cost tetraplex PCR for the global spreading multi-drug resistant fungus, Candida auris and its phylogenetic relatives. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Leaw SN, Chang HC, Sun HF, Barton R, Bouchara J-P, Chang TC. Identification of medically important yeast species by sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer regions. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(3):693–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Arastehfar A, Fang W, Pan W, Lackner M, Liao W, Badiee P, et al. YEAST PANEL multiplex PCR for identification of clinically important yeast species: stepwise diagnostic strategy, useful for developing countries. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;93(2):112–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmed A, Azim A, Baronia A, Marak RS, Gurjar M. Invasive candidiasis in non neutropenic critically ill-need for region-specific management guidelines. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015;19(6):333.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. de Almeida JN, Del Negro GM, Grenfell RC, Vidal MS, Thomaz DY, De Figueiredo DS, et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry for differentiation of the dimorphic fungal species Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Paracoccidioides lutzii. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(4):1383–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keçeli SA, Dündar D, Tamer GS. Comparison of Vitek matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry versus conventional methods in Candida identification. Mycopathologia. 2016;181(1–2):67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Castanheira M, Woosley LN, Diekema DJ, Jones RN, Pfaller MA. Candida guilliermondii and other species of Candida misidentified as Candida famata: assessment by Vitek 2, DNA sequencing analysis, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry in two global antifungal surveillance programs. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(1):117–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shokohi T, Soteh MH, Pouri ZS, Hedayati M, Mayahi S. Identification of Candida species using PCR-RFLP in cancer patients in Iran. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2010;28(2):147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasanvand S, Azadegan Qomi H, Kord M, Didehdar M. Molecular epidemiology and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of candida isolates from women with vulvovaginal candidiasis in northern cities of Khuzestan province, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2017;10(8):e12804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohammadi R, Mirhendi H, Yadegari MH, Ghahri M, Shadzi S, Jalalizand N, et al. Evaluation of Prevalence of the New Candida Species (C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis) among C. parapsilosis Group Isolated from Patients by PCR-RFLP of SADH Gene in Iran. J Isfahan Med School. 2011;29(134):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mohammadi R, Mirhendi H, Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, Ghahri M, Shidfar MR, Jalalizand N, et al. Molecular identification and distribution profile of Candida species isolated from Iranian patients. Med Mycol. 2013;51(6):657–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan Z, Ahmad S, Al-Sweih N, Khan S, Joseph L. Candida lusitaniae in Kuwait: prevalence, antifungal susceptibility and role in neonatal fungemia. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0213532.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Asner SA, Giulieri S, Diezi M, Marchetti O, Sanglard D. Acquired multidrug antifungal resistance in Candida lusitaniae during therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(12):7715–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Atkinson BJ, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Candida lusitaniae fungemia in cancer patients: risk factors for amphotericin B failure and outcome. Med Mycol. 2008;46(6):541–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirhendi H, Makimura K, Zomorodian K, Maeda N, Ohshima T, Yamaguchi H. Differentiation of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis using a single-enzyme PCR-RFLP method. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2005;58(4):235.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loreto ÉS, Scheid LA, Nogueira CW, Zeni G, Santurio JM, Alves SH. Candida dubliniensis: epidemiology and phenotypic methods for identification. Mycopathologia. 2010;169(6):431–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nikmanesh B, Ahmadikia K, Getso MI, Aghaei S. Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis as causes of pediatric candiduria: A study using HWP1 gene size polymorphism. AIMS Microbiol. 2020;6(3):272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Davies GE, Thornton CR. Differentiation of the emerging human pathogens Trichosporon asahii and Trichosporon asteroides from other pathogenic yeasts and moulds by using species-specific monoclonal antibodies. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e84789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mohammad Reza Safari and Azar Berahmeh for their assistance during the study.

Funding

This study was part of a PhD. dissertation (grant No. 9511353003) and M.S. dissertation (grant No. 9711352002) supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences. This study has been funded and supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS); grant no. 99-1-99-46502.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SK, SJH, RDG, and MK designed the study. AE, SK, MK, and AA collected yeast isolates. MK, MRS, and AA collected clinical data. MK, AE, AA, and MG performed molecular identification. SK, SR, TB, RDG, and SJH performed data analysis. MK, SK, MG, and AE prepared the first draft. All authors contributed in revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadegh Khodavaisy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Nancy L. Wengenack

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kord, M., Elmimoghaddam, A., Hashemi, S.J. et al. Comparison of PCR-RFLP with 21-plex PCR and rDNA Sequencing for Identification of Clinical Yeast Isolates. Mycopathologia 186, 213–220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-020-00522-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-020-00522-0

Keywords

Navigation