Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Energy rebound effect associated with energy efficiency: an application to China’s agricultural sector

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the process of agricultural modernization, energy consumption in China’s agriculture has increased significantly these years. Based on this context, this study tries to investigate the rebound effect of China's agricultural energy consumption, and how the popularization of agricultural machinery impacts on energy rebound rate. Elasticity analysis and data envelopment analysis based on meta-frontier are used to conduct the research, which can make the energy rebound rate more accurate compared with previous studies. Some important findings are obtained based on these methods. First, it confirms that the energy consumption in China’s agricultural sector has significant rebound effect due to technical progress, which averages 0.7215 in short term and 0.5283 in long term. This indicates that the improvement of energy efficiency can only achieve 27.85 and 47.17% of the expected energy-saving target in the short and long term. Second, there is a distinct difference in energy rebound rate in China’s different regions, the eastern area has been always far ahead of central and western regions, which implies that it is more difficult for eastern region to achieve energy saving relying on technological progress. Third, the population of mechanization increased the energy rebound rate by 0.0002 temporarily and 0.0004 permanently in the research sample. Based on these research results, some important policy implications are recommended to reduce energy rebound rate for China’s agricultural sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(E_{it}^{*}\) :

Optimal energy consumption

\(P_{it}\) :

Energy price

\(\tau_{it}\) :

Energy efficiency

\(\sigma_{\tau ,it}^{\rm st}\) :

Short-term energy elasticity

\(\sigma_{\tau ,it}^{\rm lt}\) :

Long-term energy elasticity

SRe:

Short-term rebound effect

LRe:

Long-term rebound effect

CGE:

Computable general equilibrium

GTFEE:

Energy efficiency based on group frontier

MTFEE:

Energy efficiency based on meta-frontier

DEA:

Data envelopment analysis

GMM:

Generalized method of moments

References

  • Adetutu MO, Glass AJ, Weyman-Jones TG (2016) Decomposing energy demand across BRIIC countries. Energy Econ 54:396–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adeyemi OI, Broadstock DC, Chitnis M, Hunt LC, Judge G (2010) Asymmetric price responses and the underlying energy demand trend: Are they substitutes or complements? Evidence from modelling OECD aggregate energy demand. Energy Econ 32:1157–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adofo YO, Evans J, Hunt LC (2013) How sensitive to time period sampling is the asymmetric price response specification in energy demand modelling? Energy Econ 40:90–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some test of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 1:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentzen J (2004) Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption. Energy Econ 26:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) GMM estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions. J Econom 87:15–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boufateh T (2019) The environmental Kuznets curve by considering asymmetric oil price shocks: evidence from the top two. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:706–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chitnis M, Sorrell S, Druckman A, Firth SK, Jackson T (2013) Turning lights into flights: estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy 55:234–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du KR, Li JL (2019) Towards a green world: How do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131:240–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du KR, Li PZ, Yan ZM (2019a) Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data. Technol Forecast Soc 146:297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Q, Li Z, Li Y, Bai LB, Li JT, Han X (2019b) Rebound effect of energy efficiency in China’s construction industry: a general equilibrium analysis. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:12217–12226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumagan JC, Mount TD (1993) Welfare effects of improving end-use efficiency: theory and application to residential electricity demand. Resour Energy Econ 15:175–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan RG, Luo M, Zhang PF (2016) A study on evolution of energy intensity in China with heterogeneity and rebound effect. Energy 99:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figus G, McGregor PG, Swales JK, Turner K (2020) Do sticky energy prices impact the time paths of rebound effects associated with energy efficiency actions? Energy Economics 86

  • Freire-Gonzalez J, Vivanco DF (2017) The influence of energy efficiency on other natural resources use: An input-output perspective. J Clean Prod 162:336–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening LA, Greene DL, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption: the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28:389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas R, Biermayr P (2000) The rebound effect for space heating: Empirical evidence from Austria. Energy Policy 28:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hediger C, Farsi M, Weber S (2018) Turn it up and open the window: on the rebound effects in residential heating. Ecol Econ 149:21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1991) The economics of exhaustible resources (reprinted from journal of political-economy, vol 39, pg 137–175, 1931). B Math Biol 53:281–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jevons WS (1866) The coal question; an enquiry concerning the progress of the Nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines. Macmillan, London,, xxvi, 383 p. incl. front. (diagr.) pp

  • Jin SH (2007) The effectiveness of energy efficiency improvement in a developing country: rebound effect of residential electricity use in South Korea. Energy Policy 35:5622–5629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazzoom JD (1980) Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energ J 1(4):21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JL, Liu HX, Du KR (2019) Does market-oriented reform increase energy rebound effect? Evidence from China’s regional development, China Econ Rev, p 56

    Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Zhang N, Liu YC (2016) The energy rebound effects across China’s industrial sectors: an output distance function approach. Appl Energ 184:1165–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BQ, Zhao HL (2016) Technological progress and energy rebound effect in China’s textile industry: evidence and policy implications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madlener R, Alcott B (2009) Energy rebound and economic growth: a review of the main issues and research needs. Energy 34:370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matos FJF, Silva FJF (2011) The rebound effect on road freight transport: Empirical evidence from Portugal. Energy Policy 39:2833–2841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerding S (2016) Energy efficiency and environmental sustainability - the rebound effect in horticultural enterprises. Ber Landwirtsch 94

  • Ouyang XL, Li Q, Du KR (2020) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy 139

  • Roy J (2000) The rebound effect: some empirical evidence from India. Energ Policy 28:433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders H (1992) The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energ J 13(4):131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders HD (2013) Historical evidence for energy efficiency rebound in 30 US sectors and a toolkit for rebound analysts. Technol Forecast Soc 80:1317–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper L, Grubb M (2000) On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy 28:367–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sek SK (2019) Unveiling the factors of oil versus non-oil sources in affecting the global commodity prices: a combination of threshold and asymmetric modeling approach. Energy 176:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Huang T, Yang LL (2014) Using latent variable approach to estimate China’s economy-wide energy rebound effect over 1954–2010. Energ Policy 72:235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J (2008) The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecol Econ 65:636–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steren A, Rubin OD, Rosenzweig S (2016) Assessing the rebound effect using a natural experiment setting: Evidence from the private transportation sector in Israel. Energy Policy 93:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BA, Azevedo IL (2013) Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for US households with input-output analysis. Part 2: Simulation. Ecol Econ 86:188–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T (1899) The theory of the leisure class; an economic study in the evolution of institutions. The Macmillan company;Macmillan & co., ltd., New York,London,, viii, 400 p. pp

  • Yan ZM, Ouyang XL, Du KR (2019) Economy-wide estimates of energy rebound effect: evidence from China’s provinces. Energy Economics 83:389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YJ, Peng HR (2017) Exploring the direct rebound effect of residential electricity consumption: an empirical study in China. Appl Energ 196:132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou MF, Liu Y, Feng SH, Liu Y, Lu YY (2018) Decomposition of rebound effect: an energy-specific, general equilibrium analysis in the context of China. Appl Energ 221:280–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the anonymous referees and the editors for their valuable and constructive suggestions. The research was supported by the Chinese National Research of Social Sciences Youth funded projects (No. 19CGJ041) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (No. 2019VI020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Fei.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Q. Aguilar-Virgen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, A., Sun, Q., Wang, Q. et al. Energy rebound effect associated with energy efficiency: an application to China’s agricultural sector. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 18, 3819–3832 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03085-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03085-1

Keywords

Navigation