Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of process parameters for preparation of powdered activated coke to achieve maximum SO2 adsorption using response surface methodology

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Powdered activated coke (PAC) is a good adsorbent of SO2, but its adsorption capacity is affected by many factors in the preparation process. To prepare the PAC with a high SO2 adsorption capacity using JJ-coal under flue gas atmosphere, six parameters (oxygen-coal equivalent ratio, reaction temperature, reaction time, O2 concentration, CO2 concentration, and H2O concentration) were screened and optimized using the response surface methodology (RSM). The results of factor screening experiment show that reaction temperature, O2 concentration, and H2O (g) concentration are the significant factors. Then, a quadratic polynomial regression model between the significant factors and SO2 adsorption capacity was established using the central composite design (CCD). The model optimization results indicate that when reaction temperature is 904.74°C, O2 concentration is 4.67%,H2O concentration is 27.98%, the PAC (PAC-OP) prepared had a higher SO2 adsorption capacity of 68.15 mg/g while its SO2 adsorption capacity from a validation experiment is 68.82 mg/g, and the error with the optimal value is 0.98%. Compared to two typical commercial activated cokes (ACs), PAC-OP has relatively more developed pore structures, and its SBET and Vtot are 349 m2/g and 0.1475 cm3/g, significantly higher than the 186 m2/g and 0.1041 cm3/g of AC1, and the 132 m2/g and 0.0768 cm3/g of AC2. Besides, it also has abundant oxygen-containing functional groups, its surface O content being 12.09%, higher than the 10.42% of AC1 and 10.49% of AC2. Inevitably, the SO2 adsorption capacity of PAC-OP is also significantly higher than that of both AC1 and AC2, which is 68.82 mg/g versus 32.53 mg/g and 24.79 mg/g, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gao H L, Li C, Zeng G M, et al. Flue gas desulphurization based on limestone-gypsum with a novel wet-type PCF device. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 76(3): 253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Y, Bisson T M, Yang H Q, et al. Recent developments in novel sorbents for flue gas clean up. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91 (10): 1175–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qie Z P, Sun F, Gao J H, et al. Enhanced SO2 fluidized adsorption dynamic by hierarchically porous activated coke. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2020, 93(2): 802–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang K, He Y, Wang Z H, et al. Multi-stage semi-coke activation for the removal of SO2 and NO. Fuel, 2017, 210: 738–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atanes E, Nieto-Márquez A, Cambra A, et al. Adsorption of SO2 onto waste cork powder-derived activated carbons. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 211–212: 60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pi X X, Sun F, Gao J H, et al. Microwave irradiation induced high-efficiency regeneration for desulfurized activated coke: a comparative study with conventional thermal regeneration. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(9): 9693–9702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun F, Gao J H, Liu X, et al. A systematic investigation of SO2 removal dynamics by coal-based activated cokes: the synergic enhancement effect of hierarchical pore configuration and gas components. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 357(1): 1895–1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan Z, Liu L L, Zhang Y L, et al. Activated semi-coke in SO2 removal from flue gas: selection of activation methodology and desulfurization mechanism study. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(6): 3080–3089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Zhu Y W, Gao J H, et al. Activated coke pore structure evolution and its influence on desulfuration. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(3): 1126–1132

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li B. Experimental study on adsorption removal of SO2 from flue gas by powder activated carbon in circulating fluidized bed. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Jinan: Shandong University, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Z, Wang T, Ma C Y, et al. Effect of oxygen concentration on activated char pore structure during low oxygen fast pyrolysis. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(10): 2107–2113

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaur V, Asthana R, Verma N. Removal of SO2 by activated carbon fibers in the presence of O2 and H2O. Carbon, 2006, 44(1): 46–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma C Y, Zhang Z, Wang T, et al. A device and method of the rapid preparation for powdered activated coke. 2013, China Patent, 201310176387. 1

  14. Fu J P, Zhou B X, Zhang Z, et al. One-step rapid pyrolysis activation method to prepare nanostructured activated coke powder. Fuel, 2020, 262: 116514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Z, Wang T, Ke L, et al. Powder-activated semicokes prepared from coal fast pyrolysis: influence of oxygen and steam atmosphere on pore structure. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(2): 896–903

    Google Scholar 

  16. An D H, Sun X F, Cheng X X, et al. Investigation on mercury removal and recovery based on enhanced adsorption by activated coke. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 384: 121354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z. Study on fast preparation of powder activated semi-coke and characteristics of SO2 adsorption. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Jinan: Shandong University, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li J J, Kobayashi N, Hu Y Q. The activated coke preparation for SO2 adsorption by using flue gas from coal power plant. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2008, 47(1): 118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu Y W, Gao J H, Li Y, et al. Preparation of activated carbons for SO2 adsorption by CO2 and steam activation. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2011, 43(1): 112–119

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bezerra M A, Santell R E, Oliveira E P, et al. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta, 2008, 76(5): 965–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elsayed K, Lacor C. Modeling, analysis and optimization of aircyclones using artificial neural network, response surface methodology and CFD simulation approaches. Powder Technology, 2011, 212(1): 115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun X, Kim S, Yang S D, et al. Multi-objective optimization of a Stairmand cyclone separator using response surface methodology and computational fluid dynamics. Powder Technology, 2017, 320: 51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dhawane S H, Kumar T, Halder G. Central composite design approach towards optimization of flamboyant pods derived steam activated carbon for its use as heterogeneous catalyst in transesterification of Hevea brasiliensis oil. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 100: 277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maran J P, Priya B. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of pectin from sisal waste. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2015, 115: 732–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hassan S N A M, Ishak M A M, Ismail K. Optimizing the physical parameters to achieve maximum products from co-liquefaction using response surface methodology. Fuel, 2017, 207: 102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Danmaliki G I, Saleh T A, Shamsuddeen A A. Response surface methodology optimization of adsorptive desulfurization on nickel/activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 313: 993–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoseini S S, Sobati M A. Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine operating on different water in diesel emulsion fuels: optimization using response surface methodology (RSM). Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(4): 636–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Z, Wang T, Pan X H, et al. Effect of temperature on pore structure evolution during powder-activated coke preparation by flue gas activation. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(11): 3564–3570

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shangguan J, Li C, Miao M, et al. Surface characterization and SO2 removal activity of activated semi-coke with heat treatme nt. New Carbon Materials, 2008, 23(1): 37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financial supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFB0602902).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Wang or Chunyuan Ma.

Supporting Information

11708_2020_719_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Optimizing the process parameters for preparation of powdered activated coke (PAC) to achieve maximum SO2 adsorption capacity using response surface methodology (RSM)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, B., Wang, T., Xu, T. et al. Optimization of process parameters for preparation of powdered activated coke to achieve maximum SO2 adsorption using response surface methodology. Front. Energy 15, 159–169 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0719-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0719-7

Keywords

Navigation