Abstract
Social networks and related social processes play a critical role in natural resources and environmental governance. In this paper, an environmental governance case is analyzed from a social network perspective. We explore how social networks of proponents for and opponents against environmental regulations are formed and developed and how these social networks facilitate or hinder environmental regulations in different periods. The results reveal that government leaders with political power, the key node of the social network, can connect specific networks with their value orientation and can therefore influence the structure and development of networks, which significantly affect subsequent policy formation and governance results. Social networks affect and are affected by the processes and results of environmental governance. Consequently, actors in key positions and value orientations of the community to which they belong to play a critical role; this finding has rarely been discussed in past analyses of social networks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. AMR 27:17–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922314
ASO (Accounting and Statistics Office) (2001–2012) Yi-lan county statistics summary. Yilan County Government, Yilan
ASO (Accounting and Statistics Office) (2003–2017) Yi-lan county statistical annual report. Yilan County Government, Yilan. http://bgacst.e-land.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=B72D806CE36D7F11. Accessed 15 Nov 2017
Ballet J, Sirven N, Requiers-Desjardins M (2007) Social capital and natural resource management a critical perspective. J Environ Dev 16:355–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496507310740
Bodin Ö (2017) Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357:eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2008) Management of natural resources at the community level: exploring the role of social capital and leadership in a rural fishing community. World Dev 36:2763–2779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.12.002
Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19:366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2017) Social networks: uncovering social–ecological (Mis)matches in heterogeneous marine landscapes. In: Gergel SE, Turner MG (eds) Learning landscape ecology: a practical guide to concepts and techniques, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 325–340
Bodin Ö, Crona B, Ernstson H (2006) Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective. Ecol Soc 11:r2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/resp2/
Brondizio ES, Ostrom E, Young OR (2009) Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:253–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.020708.100707
Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110:349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
Chen YH, Lee CL, Chen GR, Wang CH, Chen YH (2018) Factors causing farmland price-value distortion and their implications for peri-urban growth management. Sustainability 10:2701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082701
Crona B, Gelcich S, Bodin Ö (2017) The importance of interplay between leadership and social capital in shaping outcomes of rights-based fisheries governance. World Dev 91:70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.006
Crona B, Hubacek K (2010) The right connections: How do social networks lubricate the machinery of natural resource governance? Ecol Soc 15:18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art18/
Epstein G, Vogt J, Mincey S, Cox M, Fischer B (2013) Missing ecology: integrating ecological perspectives with the social-ecological system framework. IJC 7:432–453
Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Gutiérrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O (2011) Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470:386–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09689
Hahn T, Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P (2008) Social networks as sources of resilience in social-ecological systems. In: Norberg J, Cumming GS (eds) Complexity theory for a sustainable future, 1st edn. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 119–148
Halpern D (2005) Social capital. Polity Press, Cambridge
Harrison JL, Montgomery CA, Bliss JC (2016) Beyond the monolith: the role of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital in the cycle of adaptive capacity. Soc Nat Resour 29:525–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1103389
Hung WT, Lin ST, Ding HY (2009) Enforcement structure and environment of the institution of farmland management. J Taiwan Land Res 12:51–75
Janssen MA, Bodin Ö, Anderies JM, Elmqvist T, Ernstson H, McAllister RRJ, Olsson P, Ryan P(2006) Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems Ecol Soc 11:15. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art15/
Knoke D, Kuklinski JH (1991) Network analysis: basic concepts. In: Thompson G et al. (eds.) Markets, hierarchies and networks: the coordination of social life, 1st edn. SAGE, London, pp 173–182
Koppenjan J, Klijn EH (2004) Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making. Routledge Press, London
Krishna A (2001) Moving from the stock of social capital to the flow of benefits: the role of agency. World Dev 29:925–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00020-1
Lee YT (2009) The aspect of time dimension for new transportation infrastructures impacts on property prices: empirical studies of national freeway 5 and Yilan area in Northeastern Taiwan. Master thesis, Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Lin N (2001) Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press, New York
Lin ZQ (2007) The impacts of farmland price on ownership transfer and land use. The Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taipei, Taiwan. https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=1501470. Accessed 12 Oct 2017
McDougall C, Banjade MR (2015) Social capital, conflict, and adaptive collaborative governance: Exploring the dialectic. Ecol Soc 20:44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07071-200144
Newman L, Dale A (2007) Homophily and agency: creating effective sustainable development networks. Environ Dev Sustain 9:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9004-5
Ostrom E (2000) Social capital: a fad or a fundamental concept. In: Dasgupta P, Serageldin I (eds) Social capital: a multifaceted perspective. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 172–214
Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:641–672. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
Ostrom E, Cox M (2010) Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environ Conserv 37:451–463. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000834
Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11:18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/
Pretty J, Ward H (2001) Social capital and the environment. World Dev 29:209–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X
Rahman HMT, Hickey GM, Sarker SK (2015) Examining the role of social capital in community collective action for sustainable wetland fisheries in Bangladesh. Wetlands 35:487–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0635-5
Scott M, Balaev M, Clarke B (2018) Political embeddedness in environmental contexts: the intersections of social networks and planning institutions in coastal land use. Environ Sociol 4:286–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2017.1374232
Swaffield S (2013) Empowering landscape ecology-connecting science to governance through design values. Landsc Ecol 28:1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9765-9
Webb C, Bodin Ö (2008) A network perspective on modularity and control of flow in robust systems. In: Norberg J, Cumming GS (eds) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 85–118
Yoder L, Chowdhury RR (2018) Tracing social capital: how stakeholder group interactions shape agricultural water quality restoration in the Florida Everglades. Land Use Policy 77:354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.038
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan under Grant MOST 107-2621-M-259-001.
Authors’ Contributions
C-LS conducted the collection and analysis of field data and interviewed with respondents. C-LS and H-ST designed research, wrote the manuscript, discussed the results, and reviewed the final manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, CL., Tai, HS. Values Matter: The Role of Key Nodes of Social Networks in an Environmental Governance Case from Taiwan. Environmental Management 67, 251–262 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01396-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01396-0