Abstract
The chemical behaviour of six biologically important Adenine (A)–Thymine (T) base pairs formed as a result of the interaction between Watson–Crick(WC) type Adenine, Thymine, rare Adenine (A*) and rare Thymine (T*) bases have been studied using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT). The geometrical optimization and other relevant properties have been calculated by employing the hybrid functional CAM-B3LYP and M06-2X with 6-311++G(d,p) basis set for the reliable treatment of dispersion interaction in the gas phase. The energetic parameters show that the A*T* base pair has the highest binding energy. The characteristic Raman modes due to stretching vibrations show significant change for conformational and structural alteration. The absorption spectra of all AT conformers belong to the UV region and the excitations are due to π → π* and π → ryd* transitions. A distinct absorption peak has been observed for the protonated base pairs at a relatively higher wavelength. Natural transition orbital and molecular orbital analysis define charge transfer states associated with the electronic transitions. The lowest ionization potential, positive electron affinity and least value of hardness of the A*T* compared to the other AT base pairs suggest more reactivity of A*T* base pair than the others in chemical and biological reactions. Naturally, these structural rearrangements affect various biological and chemical processes, therefore, this study may be helpful to find out the best fit between the structurally flexible ligand and receptor and how the interaction will affect the chemistry of these important molecules.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asturiol D, Duran M, Salvador P (2008) Intramolecular basis set superposition error effects on the planarity of benzene and other aromatic molecules: a solution to the problem. J Chem Phys 128:1–5
Barbatti M, Borin AC, Ullirich S (2015) Photoinduced phenomena in nucleic acids II. Springer, Berlin
Borissova OF, Shchyolkina AK, Chernov BK, Tchurikov NA (1993) Relative stability of AT and GCpairs in parallel DNA duplex formed by a natural sequence. FEBS Lett 322:304–306
Brovarets OO, Yurenko YP, Hovorun DM (2014) Intermolecular CH···O/N H-bonds in the biologically important pairs of natural nucleobases: a thorough quantum-chemical study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 32:993–1022
Brovarets’ OO (2013) Structurally-energetic properties ofthe four configurations of the A–T and G–C DNA basepairs: comparative quantum-chemical analysis. Ukrain Biochem J 85:104–110
Brovarets’ OO, Hovorun DM (2010) How stable arethe mutagenic tautomers of DNA bases? Biopolym Cell 26:72–76
Brovarets’ OO, Hovorun DM (2013) Can tautomerisationof the A–T Watson-Crick base pair via double protontransfer provoke point mutations during DNA replication? A comprehensive QM and QTAIM analysis. J Biomol Struct Dyn 32:127–154
Brovarets’ OO, Kolomiets IM, Hovorun DM (2012) Elementary molecular mechanisms of the spontaneouspoint mutations in DNA: a novel quantum-chemicalinsight into the classical understanding. In: Tada T (ed) Quantum chemistry—molecules for innovations (59–102). In Tech Open Access, Rijeka
Chakraborty S, Lima BC, Silva AM, Chaudhuri P (2017) Effect of hydrogen-bonded interactions on the energetics and spectral properties of the astromoleculeaminoacetonitrile. Int J Quantum Chem 25459:1–13
Chawla M, Abdel-Azeim S, Oliva R, Cavallo L (2014) Higher order structural effects stabilizing the reverse Watson–Crick Guanine–Cytosine base pair in functional RNAs. Nucleic Acid Res 42:714–726
Cheng YK, Pettitt BM (1992) Hoogsteen versus reversed-Hoogsteen base pairing: DNA triple helixes. J Am Chem Soc 114:4465–4474
Dargiewicz M, Biczysko M, Improta R, Barone V (2012) Solvent effects on electron-driven proton-transfer processes: adenine–thymine base pairs. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:8981–8989
Das M, Ghosh SK (2017) A computational investigation of the red and blue shifts in hydrogen bonded systems. J Chem Sci 129:975–981
De V, Mattanja S, Pavel H (2007) Gas-phase spectroscopy of biomolecular building blocks annu. Rev Phys Chem 58:585–612
Dennington R, Keith T, Millam J (2009) Gaussview, version 5, Semichem Inc., K. S. Shawnee Mission
Donohue J, Trueblood KN (1960) Base pairing in DNA. J Mol Biol 2:363–371
Dunger A, Limbach HH, Weisz K (1998) NMR studies on the self-association of uridine and uridine analogues chem. Eur J 4:621–628
Dunger A, Limbach HH, Weisz K (2000) Geometry and strength of hydrogen bonds in complexes of 2′-deoxyadenosine with 2′-deoxyuridine. J Am Chem Soc 122:10109–10114
Elstner M, Hobza P, Frauenheim T, Suhai S, Kaxiras E (2001) Hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions of nucleic acid base pairs: a density-functional-theory based treatment. J Chem Phys 114:5149–5155
Farmanzadeh D, Najafi M (2015) Theoretical study of anticancer properties of indolyl-oxazole drugs and their interactions with DNA base pairs in gas phase and solvent. Struct Chem 26:831–844
Farrell RA, Fitzgerald TG, Borah D, Holmes JD, Morris MA (2009) Chemical interactions and their role in the microphase separation of block copolymer thin films. Int J Mol Sci 10:3671–3712
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA et al (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.02, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford
Ghosal G, Muniyappa K (2006) Hoogsteen base-pairingrevisited: resolving a role in normal biological processesand human diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 343:1–7
Głowacki ED, Vladu M, Bauer S, Sariciftci NS (2013) Hydrogen-bonds in molecular solids—from biological systems to organic electronics. J Mater Chem B1:3742–3753
Gobbo JP, Saur IV, Roca-Sanjuan D, Serrano-Andres L, Merchan M, Borin AC (2012) On the deactivation mechanisms of adenine-thymine base pair. J Phys Chem B 116:4089–4097
Grabowski SJ (2004) Hydrogen bonding strength—measures based on geometric and topological parameters. J Phys Org Chem 17:18–31
Greve C, Preketes NK, Fidder H, Costard R, Koeppe B, Heisler IA, Mukamel S, Temps F, Nibbering ETJ, Elsaesser T (2013) N–H stretching excitations in adenosine-thymidine base pairs in solution: pair geometries, infrared line shapes, and ultrafast vibrational dynamics. J Phys Chem A 117:594–606
GreveC PreketesNK, Fidder H, Costard R, Koeppe B, Heisler IA, Mukamel S, Temps F, Nibbering ETJ, Elsaesser T (2013) N–H stretching excitations in adenosine-thymidine base pairs in solution: pair geometries, infrared line shapes and ultrafast vibrational dynamics. J Phys Chem A117:594–607
Guerra CF, Bickelhaupt FM (2002) Orbital interactions in strong and weak hydrogen bonds are essential for DNA replication. Angew Chem Int 41:2092–2095
Guerra CF, Snijders JG, Bickelhaupt FM, Baerends EJ (2000) Hydrogen bonding in DNA base pairs: reconciliation of theory and experiment. J Am Chem Soc 122:4117–4128
Haschemeyer AEV, Sobell HM (1963) The crystalstructure of an intermolecular nucleoside complex: adenosineand 5-bromouridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 50:872–877
Heidari A (2016) An analytical and computational infrared spectroscopic review of vibrational modes in nucleic acids. J Anal Pharm Chem 3:1058–1072
Hernández EG, Garza J (2017) Reactivity sites in dopamine depend on its intramolecular hydrogen bond. J Mex Chem Soc 61:222–228
Jeffrey GA, Saenger W (1991) Hydrogen bonding in biological structures. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Jurecka P, Hobza P (2003) True stabilization energies for the optimal planar hydrogen-bonded and stacked structures of guanine···cytosine, adenine···thymine, and their 9- and 1-methyl derivatives: complete basis set calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) levels and comparison with experiment. J Am Chem Soc 50:15608–15613
Kelly SO, Barton JK (1999) Electron transfer between bases in double helical DNA. Science 283:375–381
Khuu P, Ho PS (2009) A rare nucleotide base tautomerin the structure of an asymmetric DNA junction. Biochemistry 48:7824–7832
Kobko N, Dannenberg JJ (2003) Cooperativity in amide hydrogen bonding chains. relation between energy, position, and H-bond chain length in peptide and protein folding models. J Phys Chem A 107:10389–10395
Koopmans T (1934) Über die Zuordnung von Wellenfunktionen und Eigenwertenzu den EinzelnenElektronenEines Atoms. Physica 1:104–113
Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D (2003) An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J Mol Biol 326:1239–1259
Leal LAE, Acevedo LO (2015) On the interaction between gold and silvermetal atoms and DNA/RNA nucleobases—a comprehensive computational studyof ground state properties. Nanotechnol Rev 4:171–194
Li X, Cai Z, Sevilla MD (2001) Investigation of proton transfer within DNA base pair anion and cation radicals by density functional theory (DFT). J Phys Chem B 105:10115–10123
Li X, Cai Z, Sevilla MD (2002) Energetics of the radical ions of the AT and AU base pairs: a density functional theory (DFT) study. J Phys Chem A 106:9345–9351
Löwdin PO (1963) Proton tunneling in DNA and its biological implications. Rev Mod Phys 35:724–732
Madzharova F, Heiner Z, Gühlke M, Kneipp J (2016) Surface-enhanced hyper-raman spectra of adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil. J Phys Chem C 120:15415–15423
Marchetti B, Karsili TN, Ashfold MN, Domcke W (2016) A ‘bottom up’, ab initio computational approach to understanding fundamental photophysical processes in nitrogen containing heterocycles, DNA bases and base pairs. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:20007–20027
Nikolova EN, Kim E, Wise AA, O’Brie PJ, Andricioaei I, Al-Hashimi HM (2011) Transient Hoogsteenbase pairs in canonical duplex DNA. Nature 470:498–502
Nisho M, Umezawa Y, Fantini J, Weiss MS, Chakrabarty P (2014) CH–π hydrogen bonds in biological macromolecules. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:12648–12683
Nosenko Y, Kunitski M, Stark T, Gobel M, Tarakeswar P, Brutschy B (2013) Vibrational signatures of Watson–Crick base pairing in adenine–thymine mimics. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:11520–11530
O’Boyle NM, Tenderholt AL, Langner KM (2008) cclib: a library for package-independent computational chemistry algorithms. J Comp Chem 29:839–845
Parvathy VR, Bhaumik SR, Chary KV, Govil G, Liu K, Howard FB, Miles HT (2002) NMR structureof a parallel-stranded DNA duplex at atomic resolution. Nucleic Acids Res 30:1500–1511
Patikoglou GA, Kim JL, Sun L, Yang SH, Kodadek T, Burley SK (1999) TATA element recognition by the TATA box-binding protein has been conserved throughout evolution. Genes Dev 13:3217–3230
Pearson RG (1993) The principle of maximum hardness. Acc Chem Res 26:250–255
Plasser F, Wormit M, Dreuw A (2014) New tools for the systematic analysis and visualization of electronic excitations. II. Applications. J Chem Phys 141:13
Privalov PL, Robinson CC (2017) Role of water in the formation of macromolecular structures. Eur Biophys J 46:203–224
Ratner M (1999) Electronic motion in DNA. Nature 397:480–481
Riek R (2001) Characterization of hydrogen bond lengths in Watson–Crick base pairs by cross-correlated relaxation. J Magn Reson 149:149–153
Saha S, Quiney HM (2017) Solvent effects on the excited state characteristics of adenine–thymine base pairs. RSC Adv 7:33426–33440
Sherrill CD (2010) Counterpoise correction and basis set superposition error. School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
Shukla MK, Leszczynski J (2002) A theoretical investigation of excited-state properties of the adenine–uracil base pair. J Phys Chem A106:1011–1018
Silva AM, Chakrabarty S, Chaudhuri P (2015) Hydrogen-bonded glycine–HCN complexes in gas phase: structure, energetics, electric properties and cooperativity. Mol Phys 113:447–462
Simon S, Duran M, Dannenberg JJ (1996) How does basis set superposition error change the potential surfaces for hydrogen-bonded dimers? J Chem Phys 105:11024–11031
Sivakova S, Rowan SJ (2005) Nucleobases as supramolecular motifs. Chem Soc Rev 34:9–21
Song J, Ng SC, Tompa P, Lee KAW, Chan HS (2013) Polycation-π interactions are a driving force for molecular recognition by an intrinsically disordered oncoprotein family. Comput Biol 9:1–12
Sponer J, Leszczynski J, Hobza P (1996) Hydrogen bonding and stacking of DNA bases: a review of quantum-chemical ab initio studies. J Biomol Struct Dyn 14:117–135
Sponer J, Leszczynski J, Hobza P (2001) Hydrogen bonding, stacking and cation binding of DNA bases. J Mol Struct (Theochem) 573:43–53
Stauffer MT (2016) Applications of molecular spectroscopy to current research in the chemical and biological sciences. InTechopen, Rijeka
Tawada Y, Suneda TT, Yanagisawa S, Yanai T, Hirao K (2004) A long-range-corrected time-dependent density functional theory. J Chem Phys 120:8425–8433
Tsolakidis A, Kaxiras E (2005) A TDDFT study of the optical response of DNA bases, base pairs, and their tautomers in the gas phase. J Phys Chem A 109:2373–2380
Varsano D, Felice RD, Marques MAL, Rubio A (2005) A TDDFT study of the excited states of DNA bases and their assemblies. J Phys Chem B 110:7129–7138
Wang W, Zhang Y, Ji B, Tian A (2011) On the correlation between bond-length change and vibrational frequency shift in halogen-bonded complexes. J Chem Phys 134:1–5
Watson JD, Crick FHC (1953) Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171:737–753
Yanson IK, Teplitsky AB, Sukhodub LF (1979) Experimental studies of molecular interactions between nitrogen bases of nucleic acids. Biopolymers 18:1149–1170
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functional. Theor Chem Acc 120:215–241
Acknowledgements
Ranjan Sutradhar acknowledges the financial support provided by DST as INSPIRE fellowship (IF160533) and Sumana Gop acknowledges the financial support provided by DST as INSPIRE fellowship (IF170013) and Sumana Chakraborty would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by SERB, DST, India (SERB Project no. SR/FTP/PS-073/2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sutradhar, R., Gop, S., Chakraborty, S. et al. How the stability, reactivity and optical response of the protonated base pairs differ with other biologically important adenine–thymine pairs: a DFT and TD-DFT approach. Chem. Pap. 75, 2159–2172 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01474-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01474-x