Abstract
Detecting predators requires information, and many behavioral and environmental features are predicted to enhance or limit an animal’s ability to learn about potential danger. Animals living in groups are thought to be at an advantage for learning about predator presence, but individual safety also depends on cues spreading from detectors to nondetectors as unsuspecting individuals may still be vulnerable. In this study, we simulated predator presence among two groups of wild samango monkeys (Cercopithecus albogularis schwarzi) to mimic natural encounters where only some individuals within a primate social group have access to personal information about potential threats. We did this using visual models of natural predators placed in positions for the monkeys to encounter within the landscape for a limited amount of time. We measured the number of individuals that were observed to detect and respond to these models with antipredator reactions, relative to subgroup size. While initial detectors that were able to spot the model themselves always reacted with overt behaviors such as alarm calling or staring at the model, responses did not typically spread to all group members. The number of initial detectors was also only weakly associated with the number of individuals that responded at the end of a trial. Initial responses to leopards were much stronger and more likely to spread than those given in response to pythons or eagles, and the importance of behaviors assumed to have an antipredator function depended on the type of predator the samangos encountered.
Significance statement
Early detection is critical for prey to survive an encounter with an ambush predator. Social prey have the advantage of being able to rely on cues from conspecifics, though individuals that do not detect a potential threat can still be susceptible to attack. Here, we exposed wild samango monkeys to predator models to simulate predator presence to only part of a social group. Habitat visibility was a key predictor affecting collective detection, but the importance of other hypothesized factors—scanning and group spatial cohesion—depended on the predator species. Overall, our results indicate that the social effectiveness of purported risk-sensitive strategies varies based on the type of threat encountered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams DB, Kitchen DM (2018) Experimental evidence that titi and saki monkey alarm calls deter an ambush predator. Anim Behav 145:141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.09.010
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974X00534
Arlet ME, Isbell LA (2009) Variation in behavioral and hormonal responses of adult male gray-cheeked mangabeys (Lophocebus albigena) to crowned eagles (Stephanoaetus coronatus) in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:491–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0682-5
Arnold K, Pohlner Y, Zuberbühler K (2008) A forest monkey’s alarm call series to predator models. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0479-y
Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (1998)Re-examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:2021–2026. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0535
Brent LJN, Semple S, MacLarnon A, Ruiz-Lambides A, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Platt ML (2014) Personality traits in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) are heritable but do not predict reproductive output. Int J Primatol 35:188–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-013-9724-6
Bürkner PC (2017) brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Softw 80:1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
Caro T (1995)Pursuit-deterrence revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 10:500–503
Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Coleman BT, Hill RA (2014) Living in a landscape of fear: the impact of predation, resource availability and habitat structure on primate range use. Anim Behav 88:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.027
Conradt L (2011) Collective behaviour: when it pays to share decisions. Nature 471:40–41
Coss RG, McCowan B, Ramakrishnan U (2007)Threat-related acoustical differences in alarm calls by wild bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata) elicited by python and leopard models. Ethology 113:352–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01336.x
Couchoux C, Clermont J, Garant D, Réale D (2018) Signaler and receiver boldness influence response to alarm calls in eastern chipmunks. Behav Ecol 29:212–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx152
Cresswell W, Quinn JL (2010) Attack frequency, attack success and choice of prey group size for two predators with contrasting hunting strategies. Anim Behav 80:643–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.06.024
Crockford C, Wittig RM, Mundry R, Zuberbühler K (2012) Wild chimpanzees inform ignorant group members of danger. Curr Biol 22:142–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.053
Fernández-Juricic E, Kacelnik A (2004) Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effects of quality and quantity of social information at different neighbour distances. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:502–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0698-9
Fernández-Juricic E, Beauchamp G, Bastain B (2007)Group-size and distance-to-neighbour effects on feeding and vigilance in brown-headed cowbirds. Anim Behav 73:771–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.014
Forster JJ, McDonald JW, Smith PWF (2003) Markov chain Monte Carlo exact inference for binomial and multinomial logistic regression models. Stat Comput 13:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023212726863
Frechette JL, Sieving KE, Boinski S (2014) Social and personal information use by squirrel monkeys in assessing predation risk. Am J Primatol 76:956–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22283
Grueber CE, Nakagawa S, Laws RJ, Jamieson IG (2011) Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J Evol Biol 24:699–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02210.x
Hartig F (2016) DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical regression models, version 1.5, https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016-11-19/web/packages/DHARMa/vignettes/DHARMa.html
Hochman V, Kotler BP (2007) Patch use, apprehension, and vigilance behavior of Nubian ibex under perceived risk of predation. Behav Ecol 18:368–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl087
Isbell LA (1994) Predation on primates: ecological patterns and evolutionary consequences. Evol Anthropol 3:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.1360030207
Isbell LA, Bidner LR (2016) Vervet monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) alarm calls to leopards (Panthera pardus) function as a predator deterrent. Behaviour 153:591–606. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003365
Isbell LA, Etting SF (2017) Scales drive detection, attention, and memory of snakes in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus). Primates 58:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-016-0562-y
Isbell LA, Young TP (1993) Human presence reduces predation in a free-ranging vervet monkey population in Kenya. Anim Behav 45:1233–1235. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1145
Janson CH, Monzón J, Baldovino MC (2014) Experimental analysis of predator and prey detection abilities in rainforest: who has the advantage? Behaviour 151:1491–1512. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003198
Kendal RL, Coolen I, Laland KN (2004) The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict. Behav Ecol 15:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh008
King AJ, Cowlishaw G (2007) When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making. Biol Lett 3:137–139. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0017
Kruschke J (2014) Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Academic Press, London
LaBarge LR, Allan ATL, Berman CM, Margulis SW, Hill RA (2020a) Reactive and pre-emptive spatial cohesion in a social primate. Anim Behav 163:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.03.005
LaBarge LR, Hill RA, Berman CM, Margulis SW, Allan ATL (2020b) Anthropogenic influences on primate antipredator behavior and implications for research and conservation. Am J Primatol (published online). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23087)
Lima SL (1995) Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers: fraught with ambiguity? Anim Behav 50:1097–1108
Lima SL (1996) The influence of models on the interpretation of vigilance. MIT Press, Cambridge
Lüdecke D (2018) sjstats: statistical functions for regression models. R Packag version 014 0, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sjstats/sjstats.pdf
Mielke A, Crockford C, Wittig RM (2019) Snake alarm calls as a public good in sooty mangabeys. Anim Behav 158:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.10.001
Miller JRB, Ament JM, Schmitz OJ (2014) Fear on the move: predator hunting mode predicts variation in prey mortality and plasticity in prey spatial response. J Anim Ecol 83:214–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12111
Moen EL, Fricano-Kugler CJ, Luikart BW, O’Malley AJ (2016) Analyzing clustered data: why and how to account for multiple observations nested within a study participant? PLoS One 11:e0146721. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146721
Ngoprasert D, Lynam AJ, Gale GA (2007) Human disturbance affects habitat use and behaviour of Asiatic leopard Panthera pardus in Kaeng Krachan National Park, Thailand. Oryx 41:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605307001102
Nowak K, Le Roux A, Richards SA, Scheijen CPJ, Hill RA (2014) Human observers impact habituated samango monkeys’ perceived landscape of fear. Behav Ecol 25:1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru110
Pays O, Beauchamp G, Carter AJ, Goldizen AW (2013) Foraging in groups allows collective predator detection in a mammal species without alarm calls. Behav Ecol 24:1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art057
Pereira ME, Macedonia JM (1991) Ringtailed lemur anti-predator calls denote predator class, not response urgency. Anim Behav 41:543–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80861-9
Schmitz OJ (2007) Predator diversity and trophic interactions. Ecology 88:2415–2426. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0937.1
Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Vervet monkey alarm calls: semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Anim Behav 28:1070–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80097-2
Shibasaki M, Kawai N (2009) Rapid detection of snakes by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): an evolutionarily predisposed visual system. J Comp Psychol 123:131–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015095
Shultz S (2001) Notes on interactions between monkeys and African crowned eagles in Taï National Park, Ivory Coast. Folia Primatol 72:248–250. https://doi.org/10.1159/000049945
Shultz S, Thomsett S (2009) Interactions between African crowned eagles and their prey community. In: McGraw WS, Zuberbühler K, Noë R (eds) Monkeys of the tai forest: an African primate community. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 171–193
Treves A (1998) The influence of group size and neighbors on vigilance in two species of arboreal monkeys. Behaviour 135:453–481
van Schaik C, Mitrasetia T (1990) Changes in the behaviour of wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) after encounters with a model python. Folia Primatol 55:104–108
Ward AJW, Sumpter DJT, Couzin ID, Hart PJB, Krause J (2008) Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:6948–6953. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710344105
Watson KK, Li D, Brent LJN, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Ruíz-Lambides AV, Robinson AG, Skene JHP, Platt ML (2015) Genetic influences on social attention in free-ranging rhesus macaques. Anim Behav 103:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.02.012
Whittingham MJ, Butler SJ, Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2004) The effect of limited visibility on vigilance behaviour and speed of predator detection: implications for the conservation of granivorous passerines. Oikos 106:377–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13132.x
Wich SA, Sterck EHM (2003) Possible audience effect in Thomas langurs (Primates; Presbytis thomasi): an experimental study on male loud calls in response to a tiger model. Am J Primatol 60:155–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.10102
Willems EP, Hill RA (2009)Predator-specific landscapes of fear and resource distribution: effects on spatial range use. Ecology 90:546–555. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0765.1
Williams ST, Williams KS, Lewis BP, Hill RA (2017) Population dynamics and threats to an apex predator outside protected areas: implications for carnivore management. R Soc Open Sci 4:161090. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.161090
Williams KS, Williams ST, Fitzgerald LE, Sheppard EC, Hill RA (2018) Brown hyaena and leopard diets on private land in the Soutpansberg Mountains, South Africa. Afr J Ecol 56:1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12539
Woodland DJ, Jaafar Z, Knight ML (1980) The “pursuit deterrent” function of alarm signals. Am Nat 115:748–753. https://doi.org/10.1086/283596
Zuberbühler K, Jenny D, Bshary R (1999) The predator deterrence function of primate alarm calls. Ethology 105:477–490. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00396.x
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments substantially improved this paper We would like to thank Cyrintha Joubert, Chris Joubert, Leah Findlay, Bill Wang, Jade Donaldson, Rosie Wynn, Bobbi Benjamin, Nadine Holmes, Ben Jones, Eiylish Powell, Annie Powell, Joe Jacobs, Aaron Eastwood, Sophie Higgett, Amy White, Ana Kovacic, Aislinn Olthoff, and Rebekah Kelly for the assistance with data collection. Finally, we would also like to thank Jabu Linden, Bibi Linden, the late Prof. Ian Gaigher, and staff of the Lajuma Research Centre for the assistance in the field and the permission to collect data.
Funding
This research was funded by a research grant from the L.B.S. Leakey Foundation and a student research grant from The Explorer’s Club.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
We followed all animal research (IACUC) guidelines from The State University of New York as well as all applicable South African and international guidelines. We received research permission from the Limpopo Province Department of Economic Development and Tourism (Permit # ZA/LP/81996), University at Buffalo IACUC (#ANT07037N), and Durham University Animal Welfare Ethical Review Board.
Informed consent
No human subjects were involved in this research.
Additional information
Communicated by T. Stankowich
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LaBarge, L.R., Allan, A.T.L., Berman, C.M. et al. Extent of threat detection depends on predator type and behavioral context in wild samango monkey groups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02959-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02959-1