Skip to main content
Log in

Brace yourselves, pirates are coming! the effects of Game of Thrones leak on TV viewership

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pre-release leaks of cultural content incentivise consumers to look for unauthorised sources. I find that such events not only affect the leaked titles but also carry spillover effects for other titles with a shared audience, suggesting the existence of strong switching costs associated with the illegal sources. I use a unique dataset on a sample of TV shows aired around the time of a pre-release leak of a large audience TV show (Game of Thrones). The results of a difference-in-differences analysis indicate that the leaked show lost viewership for both the leaked episodes and those that followed. More importantly, the event seems to have affected other TV shows that may share an audience with the leaked show. Finally, my results for the shows with a shared audience are corroborated by evidence of an increase in web searches for online sources of their episodes. These findings suggest that one-time events incentivising piracy can carry effects beyond the period and initial focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source IMDb and Nielsen (as reported on Wikipedia) data. The IMDb ratings come from IMDb public use files, downloaded on 23 June 2017

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Google Trends application allows users to track the Google search popularity of specified phrases. For more on the popularity index, see Sect. 4.

  2. See Google Trends data for the phrase “HBO”.

  3. Admittedly, Hammond (2012) concluded that pre-release file-sharing does not reduce music sales, although his results appear to describe the effect of the magnitude of pre-release file-sharing, and not the existence of pre-release file-sharing per se (as noted by Danaher et al. 2014a).

  4. It was outperformed only by shows of different formats: two documentaries (Planet Earth I & II) and a TV mini-series (Band of Brothers) from 2001.

  5. Although the show ended in 2019, it is still listed as the 12th most popular TV show on IMDb as of 30 September 2020.

  6. First episode of season 3 was aired on 31 March.

  7. Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/267161/market-share-of-search-engines-in-the-united-states/; comScore: http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings/comScore-Releases-February-2016-US-Desktop-Search-Engine-Rankings; NetMarketShare: https://www.netmarketshare.com/search-engine-market-share.aspx?qprid=4&qpcustomd=1. All accessed on 2017–09-13.

  8. In an interesting case from 2017, a hacker or a group of hackers identifying themselves as The Dark Overlord threatened Netflix that they would leak 10 out of 13 episodes of the new season of Orange is the New Black around two months ahead of the official schedule. Netflix refused to respond to the blackmail attempt, and the leaked episodes attracted many viewers. It is unclear whether this leak affected the Netflix viewership of the series, but Netflix’s refusal to acquiesce to the hackers’ demands shows that the leak might not have been harmful for this type of network.

References

  • Adermon, A., & Liang, C.-Y. (2014). Piracy and music sales: The effects of an anti-piracy law. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 105, 90–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar, L., Claussen, J., & Peukert, C. (2018). Catch me if you can: Effectiveness and consequences of online copyright enforcement. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G., Maloney, T. (2015). The impact of internet file-sharing on the purchase of music CDs in Canada. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25(4), 821–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 31(2), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadario, R. (2015). The impact of online word-of-mouth on television show viewership: An inverted U-shaped temporal dynamic. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi H., Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the present with google trends. economic record 88 (issue supplement s1), pp. 2–9.

  • Danaher, B., Dhanasobhon, S., Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2010). Converting pirates without cannibalizing purchasers: The impact of digital distribution on physical sales and internet piracy. Marketing Science, 29(6), 1138–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, B., & Smith, M. D. (2014). Gone in 60 seconds: The impact of the megaupload shutdown on movie sales. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 33, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, B., Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2014a). Piracy and copyright enforcement mechanisms. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 25–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, B., Smith, M.D., Telang, R. (2015). The Effect of piracy website blocking on consumer behavior. Working paper, SSRN-ID 2612063.

  • Danaher, B., Smith, M.D., Telang, R. (2016). Website blocking revisited: The effect of the UK November 2014 blocks on consumer behavior. Working paper, SSRN-ID 2766795.

  • Danaher, B., Smith, M. D., Telang, R., & Chen, S. (2014b). The effect of graduated response anti-piracy laws on music sales: Evidence from an event study in France. Journal of Industrial Economics, 62(3), 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, B. Waldfogel, J. (2012). Reel piracy: The effect of online film piracy on international box office sales. Working paper, SSRN-ID 1986299.

  • Ernesto (2015). Game of thrones piracy surges to new high. TorrentFreak. URL: https://torrentfreak.com/game-of-thrones-piracy-surges-to-new-high-150422/ [Accessed: 2019–10–21].

  • Hammond, R. G. (2014). Profit leak? pre-release file sharing and the music industry. Southern Economic Journal, 81(2), 387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (2012). Top 10 reasons people use to justify pirating digital content (and why they’re wrong). LitReactor. URL: https://litreactor.com/columns/top-10-reasons-people-use-to-justify-pirating-digital-content-and-why-theyre-wrong [Accessed: 2017–08–31].

  • Herz, B., & Kiljański, K. (2018). Movie piracy and displaced sales in Europe: Evidence from six countries. Information Economics and Policy, 43, 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, R. S. (2016). Sales displacement and streaming music: Evidence from YouTube. Information Economics and Policy, 34, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krawczyk, M., Tyrowicz, J., Kukla-Gryz, A., & Hardy, W. (2015). Piracy is not theft! Is it just students who think so? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 54, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krawczyk, M., Tyrowicz, J., Kukla-Gryz, A., & Hardy, W. (2017). Do pirates play fair? testing copyright awareness of sports viewers. Journal of Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(6), 650–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N., Jung, J. J., Selamat, A., & Hwang, D. (2014). Black-box testing of practical movie recommendation systems: A comparative study. Computer Science and Information Systems, 11(1), 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, T. C. (2015). Music piracy: Bad for record sales but good for the iPod? Information Economics and Policy, 31, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., Montgomery, A. L., Singh, P. V., & Smith, M. S. (2014). An empirical analysis of the impact of pre-release movie piracy on box office revenue. Information Systems Research, 25(3), 590–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J., & Walls, W. D. (2016). File sharing and film revenues: Estimates of sales displacement at the box office. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 16(1), 25–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward Brown Digital. (2013). Understanding the role of search in online piracy. Report for the MPAA.

  • MUSO. (2016). MUSO's global film & tv piracy market insight report 2016.

  • MUSO. (2017). Sample MUSO global piracy report 2017.

  • Peukert, C., Claussen, J., & Kretschmer, T. (2017). Piracy and box office movie revenues: Evidence from Megaupload. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 52, 188–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pick, D., & Eisend, M. (2014). Buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching: A meta-analytic assessment of their antecedents. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivan, L., Smith, M.D., Telang, R. (2014). Do search engines influence media piracy? evidence from a randomized field study. Working paper, SSRN-ID 2495591.

  • Sood, S., & Drèze, X. (2006). Brand extensions of experiential goods: Movie sequel evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, E. (2016). HBO now has 800,000 paid streaming subscribers, time warner says. The Nw York times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/11/business/media/hbo-now-has-800000-paid-streaming-subscribers-time-warner-says.html.

  • Veitch, R., Constantiou, I. (2012). User decisions in a (partly) digital world: Comparing digital piracy to legal alternatives for film and music. European conference on information systems (ECIS) 2012 proceedings 174.

  • Witt, S. (2015). How Music Got Free. The end of an industry, the turn of the century, and the patient zero of piracy. Viking, United States of America.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the reviewers of the prior version of this article for their helpful comments, as well as thank Iga Magda of IBS, the participants of the ACEI 2018, DELAB 2017, WIEM 2017, and EALE 2018 conferences, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw doctoral seminar and IBS internal seminar for their valuable comments. I would also like to thank the IMDb team for pointing me to the IMDb public use files. The usual disclaimers apply. All errors are mine.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Centre (Grant UMO-2016/21/N/HS4/01803).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wojciech Hardy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 10.

Table 10 Difference-in-differences estimation of the effect of the leak on viewership of shows sharing their audience with GOT (four recommended shows)

Appendix 2

See Table 11.

Table 11 Difference-in-differences estimation of the effect of the leak on Google popularity of the GoT-audience TV shows. Panel OLS regressions with fixed effects (four recommended shows)

Appendix 3

See Tables 12 and 13.

Table 12 As in Table 7 without the lagged dependent variable
Table 13 As in Table 7 using Arellano-Bond

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hardy, W. Brace yourselves, pirates are coming! the effects of Game of Thrones leak on TV viewership. J Cult Econ 46, 27–55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09404-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09404-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation