Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Architectural concept design process impacted by body and movement

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the wide-ranging impact of inviting architecture students to increase conscious somatic awareness of their body and function, and the effects on their design process. This paper analyses the results of a Movement Awareness Intervention conducted prior to students undertaking their usual architectural design studio at the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. The impact of a global trend in extensive use of digital design tools has resulted in impacts on components in the architecture design process that appear to be slipping under the radar in architecture education and practice. This article addresses issues raised by Juhani Pallasmaa and Paolo Belardi, bolstered by neuroscience research by Harry Mallgrave and colleagues, to explore the impact of heightened conscious bodily awareness upon the cognitive design thinking processes required in the architecture. The case study research using mixed data collection methods on 39 participants draws upon surveys, hand notations, and audio interviews to track participant perceptions of the impact on their design process in action. Analysis of the data produced in this study addresses the concerns raised by theses seminal writers. This paper argues for new approaches to reconfiguring and recalibrating of emotional, cognitive, and physical stimulants that were once invisibly physically embedded in the traditional architectural design process to work with digital design technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbib, M. A. (2020). From sensing places to design spaces: Linking wayfinding, memory, and imagination. Paper presented at the Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture (ANFA), Sandiego, California, USA.

  • Beilock, S. L., Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2008). Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(36), 13269. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803424105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belardi, P. (2014). Why architects still draw (Z. Nowak, Trans.). Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitter, F., Hillier, S., & Civetta, L. (2011). Change in dexterity with sensory awareness training: A randomised controlled trial. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112(3), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.2466/15.22.PMS.112.3.783-798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breunig, M. C. (2009). Teaching Dewey’s experience and education experientially (pp. 1–395). Teaching adventure education theory: Best Practices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, M. (2007). Homo faber: Modelling architecture (Vol. Book, Whole). Melbourne: Spatial Information Architecture Laboratory and the Melbourne Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, B. (2016). Australians spend 10 hours a day on internet connected devices: The digital trends your SME needs to know. Retrieved from https://www.smartcompany.com.au/technology/australians-spend-10-hours-a-day-on-internet-connected-devices-the-digital-trends-your-SME-needs-to-know/

  • Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, J. M., Giapponi, C. C., & Golden, T. D. (2016). Digital technology and student cognitive development: The neuroscience of the university classroom. Journal of Management Education, 40(4), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562915614051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claesges, U. (1964). Experience, perceptual. Oxford University Press.

  • Clarke, N., Kuipers, M., & Stroux, S. (2019). Embedding built heritage values in architectural design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798019-09534-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti, G. (2014a). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti, G. (2014b). Why call bodily sense making “languaging”? Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2005 [1947]). Art as experience. Perigee Books.

  • D’Isanto, T. (2016). Pedagogical value of the body and physical activity in childhood. Sport Science, 9(Supplement 2), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Piedade Ferreira, M., Duarte, J. P., & Kretzer, A. (2019). Embodied emotions: A methodology for experiments in architecture and corporeality. Research culture in architecture: cross-disciplinary collaboration.

  • DeSutter, D., & Stieff, M. (2017). Teaching students to think spatially through embodied actions: Design principles for learning environments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0039-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. D. N. (2015). The brain’s way of healing: Remarkable discoveries and recoveries from the frontiers of neuroplasticity. Brunswick, Victoria: Scribe Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, I., Jones, M., & Hillier, S. (2006). The interpretation of experience and its relationship to body movement: A clinical reasoning perspective. Manual Therapy, 11(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2005.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., Gu, X., Guise, K. G., Liu, X., Fossella, J., Wang, H., et al. (2009). Testing the behavioural interaction and integration of attentional networks. Brain and Cognition, 70(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldenkrais, M. (1990). Awareness through movement. New York: Harper One.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, K. (1996). Studies in tectonic culture: The poetics of construction in nineteenth and twentieth century architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action’s influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 664–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman Schuyler, K. (2010). Increasing leadership integrity through mind training and embodied learning. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(1), 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G. (2017). Manual sketching: Why is it still relevant? In S. Ammon & R. Capdevila-Werning (Eds.), The active image (pp. 77–97). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323, 6971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J. (2016). Merleau-Ponty for architects. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holl, S., Pallasmaa, J., & Gómez, A. P. (2006). Questions of perception: phenomenology of architecture. William K Stout Pub.

  • Hughes, F. (2009). Head banging: Engineered neutrality + the parametric ceiling. Architectural Design, 79(6), 128–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodidio, P. (2008). Piano: Renzo piano building workshop - 1966 to today. Taschen.

  • Keegan, S. (2012). Digital technologies are re-shaping our brains. Qualitative Market Research, 15(3), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751211232012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontra, C., Goldin Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Embodied learning across the life span. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01221.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, M.-A., Van Dam, N. T., & Fan, J. (2013). Cognitive control and attentional functions. Brain and Cognition, 82(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallgrave, H. F. (2013). Architecture and embodiment: The implications of the new sciences and humanities for design. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mallgrave, H. F. (2015). Embodiment and enculturation: The future of architectural design (Report). Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallgrave, H. F. (2018). From object to experience: The new culture of architectural design. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebert, K., & Gropengießer, H. (2014). Understanding the greenhouse effect by embodiment–analysing and using students’ and scientists’ conceptual resources. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2014). Give your ideas some legs: The positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses (Vol. Book, Whole). Chichester, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallasmaa, J. (2012). Towards a neuroscience of architecture: embodied mind and imagination. In P. Tidwell (Ed.), Architecture and neuroscience: A Tapio Wirkkala-Rut Bryk design reader (pp. 5–22). Espoo: Tapio Wirkkala Rut Bryk Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallasmaa, J. (2017). Embodied and existential wisdom in architecture: The thinking hand. Body & Society, 23(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X16681443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualini, I., Llobera, J., & Blanke, O. (2013). “Seeing” and “feeling” architecture: How bodily self-consciousness alters architectonic experience and affects the perception of interiors. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polyani, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Anchor Books.

  • Reece, M. (2015). Moshe Feldenkrais: A life in movement. Reesekress Somatics press.

  • Robinson, S., & Pallasmaa, J. (2015). Mind in architecture: Neuroscience, embodiment, and the future of design. MIT Press.

  • Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than meets the eye? Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1995). Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot, England: Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seamon, D. (2018). Architecture and phenomenology. The Routledge.

  • Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). Re-thinking Husserl’s fifth meditation. Philosophy Today, 43, 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012). Movement and mirror neurons: A challenging and choice conversation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2015). Embodiment on trial: A phenomenological investigation. Continental Philosophy Review, 48(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-014-9315-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2019). Kinesthesia: An extended critical overview and a beginning phenomenology of learning. Continental Philosophy Review, 52(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-018-09460-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. Sage.

  • Spitzer, M. (2014). Information technology in education: Risks and side effects. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(3–4), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2014.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, S. A. (2015). Embodied learning. Educational philosophy and theory, 47(5), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.879694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toms, R., & Mesari, A. (2017). What stops built environment professionals creating healthier places? Paper presented at the Unleashing health by design: Creating a culture of wellness in our cities. 16–17 October, Royal College of Physicians, London (pp. 59). London: Salus Global.

  • Turkle, S. (2009). Simulation and its discontents. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1949). The art of thought. London: Watts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warden, R., & Woodcock, D. (2005). Historic documentation: a model of project based learning for architectural education. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73(2–3), 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, N. (2011). Teachers’ educational design as a process of reflection-in-action: The lessons we can learn from Donald Schön’s “The Reflective Practitioner” when studying the professional practice of teachers as educational designers. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(1), 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R., (2018). Case study and research applications. Sage.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Discipline of Architecture, School of Creative Industries, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Gardens Point, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Catherine Sinnamon & Evonne Miller

Authors
  1. Catherine Sinnamon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evonne Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinnamon, C., Miller, E. Architectural concept design process impacted by body and movement. Int J Technol Des Educ 32, 1079–1102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09636-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09636-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation