Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The viability of diverting from a linear to a parallel approach to the development of PCK in technology teacher education

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The continual trend of the declining number of prospective student teachers in technology education necessitated a revisit and investigation of the entrance requirement (for technology teacher education) of having studied technology as a school subject. Subsequently a small scale, longitudinal, quasi-experimental research project was adopted with the aim to increase the number of prospective student teachers in technology education. As part of the project technology student teachers had to take the school subject in parallel together with the development of discipline knowledge within the broader development of their PCK. However, the viability of such a parallel approach of taking the school subject and developing discipline knowledge simultaneously was unknown. The purpose of the study was to determine the viability of technology student teachers taking the school subject technology and developing discipline knowledge simultaneously within the broader development of their PCK. The main research question was: What is the viability of technology student teachers taking the school subject technology and developing discipline knowledge simultaneously within the broader development of their PCK? The population consisted of the technology student teachers who enrolled for the 4-year pre-service teacher education qualification for the first time in 2016 and 2017, and a mixed-method research approach was followed. The qualitative findings did not indicate important differences in student experience between students with or without Engineering Graphics and Design (EGD) in year 12 for both cohorts. The quantitative findings indicated that although the students from both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 who had studied EGD in year 12 achieved statistically significantly higher marks at the end of their first year than those who did not have EGD in year 12, students without EGD in year 12 from both cohorts also completed their second year successfully. It was found that the parallel approach to PCK development in technology teacher education seems to be viable to increase the number of prospective technology student teachers, with the requirement that it happens within a social constructivist, co-operative learning environment with ample opportunities for cognitive and practical apprenticeship in a community of practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2010). Design thinking: The act or practice of using your mind to consider design. Lausanne: AVA Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankiewicz, P. (2016). The relevance of indigenous technology knowledge systems (ITKS) for the 21st century classroom. In M. J. de Vries, A. Bekker-Holtland, & G. van Dijk (Eds.), Technology education for 21st century skills. Proceedings of the PATT 32 conference (pp. 22–34). Utrecht.

  • Ankiewicz, P. (2018a). A brief overview of technology education in South Africa since 1994. Unpublished keynote address at the CETIS’ Summer Seminar Rockelstadt, Sweden. Retrieved from June 14, 2018.

  • Ankiewicz, P. (2018b). Perceptions and attitudes of pupils toward technology. In M. J. de Vries (Ed.), Handbook of technology education, Springer international handbooks of education (pp. 581–596). Bern: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankiewicz, P. (2020). Technology education in South Africa since the new dispensation in 1994: An analysis of curriculum documents and a meta-synthesis of scholarly work. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09589-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ankiewicz, P. J. (2015). The implications of the philosophy of technology for the academic majors of technology student teachers. In M. Chatoney (Ed.), Plurality and complementarity of approaches in design and technology education. Proceedings of the PATT 29 conference (pp. 13–25). Marseille.

  • Ankiewicz, P. J., De Swardt, A. E., & De Vries, M. (2006). Some implications of the philosophy of technology for science, technology and society (STS) studies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(2), 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Chiappini, G. P., Lemut, E., Marara, N., & Pellery, M. (1993). Learning programming as a cognitive apprenticeship through conflicts. In E. Lemut, B. Du Boulay, & G. Dettori (Eds.), Cognitive models and intelligent environments for learning models (pp. 284–297). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assessment of Performance Unit (APU). (1994). Learning through design and technology. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching technology (pp. 59–67). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, F. (2008). Learning in DEPTH: Developing a graphical tool for professional thinking for technology teachers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9050-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, F., Barlex, D., Jarvinen, E., O’Sullivan, G., Owen-Jackson, G., & Rutland, M. (2004). DEPTH—Developing professional thinking for technology teachers: An international study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2018). Teaching electronics: From building circuits to systems thinking and programming. In M. J. de Vries (Ed.), Handbook of technology education, Springer international handbooks of education (pp. 337–360). Bern: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Waks, S. (1997). An Israeli study of longitudinal in-service training of mathematics, science and technology teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23(2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. I. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of pedagogical approaches to STEM education: Design and technology. In S. Pulé & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education. Proceedings of the PATT 37 conference (pp. 221–232). Msida.

  • Bell, D. I., Wooff, D., & McLain, M. (2019). Re-designing design and technology education: A living literature review of stakeholder perspective. In S. Pulé & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education. Proceedings of the PATT 37 conference (pp. 233–248). Msida.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdalen NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk Wolters, F. (1989). A PATT study among 10 to 12-year-olds. In PATT 4 conference proceedings (pp. 324–330). Eindhoven.

  • De Miranda, M. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge for technology education. In M. J. de Vries (Ed.), Handbook of technology education, Springer international handbooks of education (pp. 685–689). Bern: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1899). The school and society: Being three lectures. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1963). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfE. (2018). Initial teacher training (ITT) census for the academic year 2018 to 2019, England. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/gevrnment/uploads/system/uploads/. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.

  • DfE. (2019). Official Statistics: Entries for GCSE, AS and A level—Summer 2019 exam series. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/entries-for-gcse-as-and-a-level-summer2019-exam-series. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.

  • Engelbrecht, W., & Ankiewicz, P. (2016). Criteria for continuing professional development of technology teachers’ professional knowledge: A theoretical perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9309-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantz, T. D., De Miranda, M. A., & Siller, T. J. (2011). Knowing what engineering and technology teachers need to know: An analysis of pre-service teachers engineering design problems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(3), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In P. Friedichsen, J. Loughran, & A. Berry (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. (2019). The truth is in the boat: A case study of pedagogical content knowledge and technical skill development in pre-service technology education teachers. In S. Pulé & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education. Proceedings of the PATT 37 conference (pp. 167–176). Msida.

  • Grobler, R. (2018). Innovating an initial professional education of technology teachers (IPETT) programme. In N. Seery, J. Buckley, D. Canty, & J. Phelan (Eds.), Research and practice in technology education: Perspectives on human capacity and development. Proceedings of the PATT 36 conference (pp. 156–166). Athlone.

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakovljevic, M., & Ankiewicz, P. (2016). Project-based pedagogy for the facilitation of webpage design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9312-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D., & Thomas, R. (1992). Technology education and the cognitive revolution. The Technology Teacher, 51(4), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtman, M. (2010). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1–2), 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R., & Davidson, M. (1996). Problem solving and the tyranny of product outcomes. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 1(3), 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain, M., Bell, D., Wooff, D., & Morrison-Love, D. (2018). Cultural and historical roots for design and technology education: Why technology makes us human. In N. Seery, J. Buckley, D. Canty, & J. Phelan (Eds.), Research and practice in technology education: Perspectives on human capacity and development. Proceedings of the PATT 36 conference (pp. 223–230). Athlone.

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (3rd ed.). New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, V., Ankiewicz, P., & De Swardt, E. (2005). Learning theories: A conceptual framework for learning and instruction in technology education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19(3), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, M. G. (2009). Measuring teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in primary technology education. Research in Science and Technology Education, 27(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140903162652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. (2010). Reviewing the relations between teachers’ knowledge and pupils’ attitude in the field of primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. (2012). Analysing teacher knowledge for technology education in primary schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(3), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Fostering communities of teachers as learners: Disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibuyi, C. D. (2012). Effective teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching quadratic functions in mathematics. M.Ed. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

  • South Africa, Department of Higher Education and Training. (2011). National Qualifications Framework Act (67/2008): Policy of the Minimum Requirements for Teacher Education Qualifications (Government Gazette 34467, Notice 583, 15 July 2011). Pretoria: Government Printer.

  • Van As, F. (2016). Developing 21st century skills among undergraduate student teachers. In M. J. de Vries, A. Bekker-Holtland, & G. van Dijk (Eds.), Technology education for 21st century skills. Proceedings of the PATT 32 conference (pp. 35–48). Utrecht.

  • Von Mengersen, B. (2017). Hyper design thinking: Critique, praxis and reflection. In P. J. Williams & K. Stables (Eds.), Critique in design and technology education (pp. 301–320). Singapore: Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., Lockley, J., & Mangan, J. (2016). Technology teacher’s use of a CoRe to develop their PCK. In M. J. de Vries, A. Bekker-Holtland, & G. van Dijk (Eds.), Technology education for 21st century skills. Proceedings of the PATT 32 conference (pp. 489–498). Utrecht.

  • Williams, P. J. (2008). Using DEPTH as a framework for the determination of teacher professional development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9047-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article builds on the paper presented by Grobler (2018) at the Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT) conference in June 2018, held at the Athlone Institute of Technology, Ireland. The authors are also grateful to Francois van As and Werner Engelbrecht for their valuable input and support during the research process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science and Technology Education, Faculty of Education, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa

    Rina Grobler & Piet Ankiewicz

Authors
  1. Rina Grobler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Piet Ankiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piet Ankiewicz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grobler, R., Ankiewicz, P. The viability of diverting from a linear to a parallel approach to the development of PCK in technology teacher education. Int J Technol Des Educ 32, 1001–1021 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09644-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09644-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation