Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Communication

Math Homework Purpose Scale

Measurement Invariance and Latent Mean Differences across Gender

Published Online:October 04, 2019https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000234

Abstract

Abstract. The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Math Homework Purpose Scale (MHPS). After randomly splitting the sample (N = 854) into two subsamples (n = 427 and n = 427), we carried out exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on subsample 1 and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on subsample 2. The Kaiser-Meyer Olkin value of .88 indicated that EFA was appropriate for subsample 1. EFA results showed that a three-factor solution explained 72.2% of the variance. All ten of the MHPS items loaded quite substantially on three factors labeled Academic, Self-Regulatory, and Approval-Seeking. CFA results further showed that the MHPS was composed of three factors: Academic, Self-Regulatory, and Approval-Seeking. From this adequate level of measurement invariance, we further examined the latent mean difference across gender for the entire sample. Our findings showed no statistically significant mean differences in Academic, Self-Regulatory, and Approval-Seeking across gender. In addition, the HMPS was found to have adequate alpha reliability coefficients and omega coefficients. Concerning the validity evidence of the MHPS, Academic, Self-Regulatory, and Approval-Seeking purposes were positively correlated with homework effort, homework completion, and math achievement. The present study provides solid evidence that the MHPS is a reliable and valid measurement of math homework purposes.

References

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bryan, T., Burstein, K., & Bryan, J. (2001). Students with learning disabilities: Homework problems and promising practices. Educational Psychologist, 36, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carr, N. S. (2013). Increasing the effectiveness of homework for all learners in the inclusive classroom. School Community Journal, 23(1), 169–182. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1989). Homework: A cross-cultural examination. Child Development, 60, 551–561. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130721 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, H. (2007). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.70 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educational Researcher, 25, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025008027 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. Elementary School Journal, 100, 529–548. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Du, J., Xu, J., & Fan, X. (2016). Investigating factors that influence students’ help seeking in math homework: A multilevel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018053 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Epstein, J. L., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fan, H., Xu, J., Cai, Z., He, J., & Fan, X. (2017). Homework and students’ achievement in math and science: A 30-year meta-analysis, 1986–2015. Educational Research Review, 20, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological measurement, 66, 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gao, X., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. (2011). “Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient”: Understanding primary school English teachers’ conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research, 15, 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383344 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hong, E., Peng, Y., & Rowell, L. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement level differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, L., & West, J. (1992). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: A profile of parents of eighth graders. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self‐competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Keith, T. Z. (1986). Homework. West Lafayette, IN: Kappa Delta Pi. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Khojasteh, J., & Lo, W. J. (2015). Investigating the sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indices to detect measurement invariance in a bifactor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937791 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kitsantas, A., Cheema, J., & Ware, H.W. (2011). Mathematics achievement: The role of homework and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 310–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Li, H., & Li, N. (2018). Features and characteristics of Chinese new century mathematics textbooks. In Y. CaoF. K. S. LeungEds., The 21st century mathematics education in China (pp. 171–192). Berlin, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Guo, J., Arens, A. K., & Murayama, K. (2016). Breaking the double-edged sword of effort/trying hard: Developmental equilibrium and longitudinal relations among effort, achievement, and academic self-concept. Developmental psychology, 52, 1273–1290. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2011). Learning disabilities: Implications for policy regarding research and practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711421756 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Cerezo, R., & Valle, A. (2015). Teachers’ feedback on homework, homework-related behaviors, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 108, 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.878298 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.438 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Voorhis, F. L. (2004). Reflecting on the homework ritual: Assignments and designs. Theory into Practice, 43, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4303_6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Walberg, H. J. (1991). Does homework help? School Community Journal, 1(1), 13–15. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Warton, P. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Watkins, M. W. (2017). The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: From alpha to omega. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31, 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Expectancy value theory in cross-cultural perspective. In D. M. McInerneyS. V. EttenEds., Big theories revisited, Vol. 4: Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 165–198). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wong, N. Y. (1992). The relationship among mathematics achievement, affective variables and home background. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4(3), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217245 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xu, J. (2005). Purposes for doing homework reported by middle and high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.1.46-55 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xu, J. (2006). Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26, 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500341023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xu, J. (2008). Models of secondary students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180–1205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323276 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xu, J. (2010). Homework purpose scale for high school students: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409344517 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xu, J. (2018). Reciprocal effects of homework self-concept, interest, effort, and math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.09.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xu, J., & Corno, L. (1998). Case studies of families doing third grade homework. Teachers College Record, 100, 402–436. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Xu, J., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Homework Management Scale: Confirming the factor structure with middle school students in China. Psychology in the Schools, 52, 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21826 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xu, J., & Yuan, R. (2003). Doing homework: Listening to students’, parents’, and teachers’ voices in one urban middle school community. School Community Journal, 13(2), 25–44. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (1996). Differential achievement of girls and boys at GCSE: Some observations from the perspective of one school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17, 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569960170304 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar