French Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action Programs and Their Beneficiaries
Abstract
Abstract. Attitudes toward affirmative action programs (AAPs) depend on the criteria on which these programs are based and on the ideological views in the relationships between groups. The present study examined the impact of the selection procedure (with or without AA) on the perception of justice and on attitudes toward the beneficiaries of these procedures in France, where the system makes it possible to compare beneficiaries of different origins. A group of 101 French students read scenarios describing the admission of a candidate, with either a French or a North African first name, to a prestigious school, based on either a standard selection procedure or AA. The standard procedure and its beneficiary were more positively judged, and the beneficiary was considered more competent, than one selected with AAP. These results were particularly significant for participants with a high level of social dominance orientation (SDO). Furthermore, participants perceived both selection procedures more positively and judged the candidate as being more competent when that person had a French-sounding name. High-SDO participants underestimated socioeconomic and ethnic discrimination. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
References
(2007). Diversity experiences predict changes in attitudes toward affirmative action. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.13.4.285
(2016). Policy type and justification influences on support for affirmative action policies. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 15, 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000156
(2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000280003
(2006, November). Observatoire des discriminations: Baromètre des discriminations avec le soutien d’ADIA
[French discrimination monitoring center: Barometer of discrimination, with the support of ADIA] . Proceedings of the Conference “Exclusions et discriminations: comprendre et agir” organized by l’AFPA/INOIP (pp. 83–89). Paris: INOIP.(2005). New racism, meritocracy and individualism: Constraining affirmative action in education. Discourse & Society, 16, 315–340.
(2005). Attitudes toward affirmative action: A comparison of color‐blind versus modern racist attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1384–1399.
(2010). The effects of mortality salience and social dominance orientation on attitudes toward illegal immigrants. Social Psychology, 41, 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000008
(2001). Reactions to affirmative action: Group membership and social justice. Social Justice Research, 14(1), 61–78.
(2000). Les discriminations dans l’emploi et leurs impacts, l’exemple roubaisien
[Discrimination in employment and its impact: The example of Roubaix] . Roubaix: Voix de nanas.(1989). Acculturation attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 38, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01208.x
(2010). Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.11.007
(1999). Le code, les codac et la citoyenneté européenne
[The code, Departmental Commission for Access to Citizenship and European citizenship] . Hommes et Migrations, 1219, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.3406/homig.1999.3321(2001).
The French model: Color-blind integration . In J. D. SkrentnyEd., Color lines: Affirmative action, immigration, and civil-rights options for America (pp. 270–296). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.(2001). The concern for justice and reactions to affirmative action: Cause or rationalization. Justice in the Workplace, 2, 121–143.
(2011). La haute autorité de lutte contre les discriminations et pour l’égalité: un laboratoire juridique éphémère ?
[National Antidiscrimination and Equality Authority: A short-lived legal laboratory] . Revue Française d’Administration Publique, 3, 369–380.(2009). Acculturation orientations and social relations between immigrant and host community members in California. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108330988
(1998). Attitudes toward affirmative action in the United States and Canada. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025011407967
(2004). La discrimination positive
[Affirmative action] . Paris: PUF.(2005). Les effets directs et indirects des stéréotypes sociaux sur une décision d’orientation scolaire
[The direct and indirect effects of social stereotypes on academic choices] . Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 55, 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2005.02.003(2006). Entre méritocratie et préjugés, la discrimination positive peut-elle se frayer un chemin?
[Can affirmative action navigate a path between meritocracy and prejudice?] L’Année Psychologique, 106, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503306003022(2003). La théorie de la dominance sociale et les choix d’orientation scolaire et de rôles sociaux des filles et des garçons
[Social dominance theory and the choices of academic subjects and social roles among girls and boys] . L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 32, 595–616. https://doi.org/10.4000/osp.2600(2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
. (2016). Rapport sur la lutte contre le racisme, l’antisémitisme et la xénophobie
[Report on the fight against racism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia] . Paris: La Documentation Française.(2001). L’ethnicisation du lien social dans les banlieues françaises
[Ethnicization of social relationships in the French suburbs] . Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, 17, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.3406/remi.2001.1781(2014). Sociologie des prénoms
[Sociology of first names] . Paris: La Découverte.(2001).
Addressing and redressing discrimination: Affirmative action in social psychological perspective . In R. BrownS. GaertnerEds., Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 495–513). Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA.(2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.93
(2013).
Affirmative action and gender equality . In M. K. RyanN. R. BranscombeEds., The SAGE handbook of gender and psychology (pp. 484–499). London, UK: Sage.(2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
(2001). La théorie de la privation relative et l’hostilité envers les Nord-Africains en France
[The theory of relative deprivation and hostility toward North Africans in France] . International Review of Social Psychology, 14, 57–89.(2002). Modélisation de quelques déterminants psychosociaux de l’attitude envers l’extrême
[Modelling of some psychosocial determinants of attitude towards the extreme] . Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 55, 49–63.(2007). Une discrimination positive à la française ? Ethnicité et Territoire dans les politiques de la ville
[French-style affirmative action? Ethnicity and the region in urban policies] . Paris: La Découverte.(2004). La dominance sociale et le “mythes légitimateurs”: Validation d’une version française de l’échelle d’orientation à la dominance sociale. International Review of Social Psychology, 17, 97–126.
(2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(621), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621
(1994). Affirmative action in theory and practice: Issues of power, ambiguity, and gender versus race. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 201–220.
(2004). Attitudes toward affirmative action as a function of the strength of ethnic identity among Latino college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1773–1796.
(2012). The influence of education on attitudes toward affirmative action: The role of the policy’s strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00892.x
(2002). Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: The antecedents and consequences of “principled objections” to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.488
(2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race‐conscious programs: Principles or prejudice? American Journal of Political Science, 49, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00117.x
(1991). Attitudes of Canadians toward affirmative action: Opposition, value pluralism, and nonattitudes. Political Behavior, 13(1), 67–95.
(2008). Un problème de catégories : Stéréotypes et lutte contre les discriminations
[A problem of categories: Stereotypes and the fight against discrimination] . Text published as part of the 2007-2008 visiting professor program organized in partnership by Sciences Po and the French-American Foundation on the theme of equal opportunities. Text available at https://www.inegalites.fr/Les-paradoxes-des-politiques-antidiscriminatoires-francaises. (2010). Rapport annuel. [Annual report]. Available at http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/114000234/
(1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.536
(1998). Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.190
(2015). Antiegalitarians for affirmative action? When social dominance orientation is positively related to support for egalitarian social policies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12311
(2012). Le modèle républicain d’intégration: Implications pour la psychologie des relations entre groupes
[The republican model of integration: Implications for the psychology of intergroup relations] . L’année psychologique, 112(10, 49–83.(2016). De la discrimination positive
[About affirmative action] . Paris: Editions Bréal.(1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1997). Affirmative action: A review of psychological and behavioral research. Bowling Green, OH: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
(1993). L’individu et les minorités: La France et la Grande-Bretagne face à leurs immigrés
[The individual and minorities: how France and Great Britain deal with their immigrants] . Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.. (2015). Perception des discriminations dans l’emploi. Enquête auprès des demandeurs d’emploi
[Perception of discrimination in employment: Survey of job applicants] . Retrieved 23 February 2016, from http://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ddd_etu_20140201_barometreoit_presentation.pdf(2002). Les représentations des groupes dominants et dominés. Collections et agrégats
[Images of dominant and dominated groups. Collections and aggregates] . Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.(2004).
Vaut-il mieux être une femme qualifiée ou être qualifiée de femme? Effets paradoxaux de la catégorisation dans la discrimination positive [Is it better to be a qualified woman or to be qualified as a woman? Paradoxical effects of categorization in positive discrimination] In M. Sanchez-MazaasEd., L’autre. Regards psychosociaux (pp. 279–308). Presses Universitaires de Grenoble: Grenoble.(2006). Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961
(2006). Discrimination positive: un bilan des expériences américaines et européennes
[Affirmative action: An assessment of American and European experiences] . Revue Française d’Economie, 21, 147–193. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfeco.2006.1598(2007). Acculturation preferences of host community: The effect of immigrants’ acculturation strategies on evaluation and impression formation. International Journal of Intercultural Relation, 31, 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.06.001
(2014). Host populations’ perceptions toward migrants: The effect of private/public settings and the moderating role of threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 41, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.05.006
(2010). Les nouveaux visages de la discrimination
[The new faces of discrimination] . Brussels: De Boeck.(1988). Le creuset français: Histoire de l’immigration XIXe-XXe siècle
[The French melting pot: History of immigration in the 19th and 20th century] . Paris: Seuil.(2010). Beliefs about affirmative action: A test of the group self-interest and racism beliefs models. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3, 163–176.
(2012). Ideology, prejudice, and attitudes toward sexual minority social policies and organizations. Political Psychology, 33, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00871.x
(2009). Why do white Americans oppose race targeted policies? Clarifying the impact of symbolic racism. Political Psychology, 30, 805–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00726.x
(2002). Des jeunes dans la discrimination
[Young people who are discriminated against] . Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.(2007). Social dominance orientations and reactions about the affirmative action for recruitment. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 1, 77–92.
(2009). Attribution à la discrimination ethnique à l’embauche, réactions émotionnelles des candidats et perception de l’employeur
[Role of ethnic discrimination during recruitment, emotional reactions of candidates and employer’s perception] . Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 83, 45–69. https://doi.org/10.3917/cips.083.0045(2006). The role of threat toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00003.x
(2007). Equality and transparency: A strategic perspective on affirmative action in American law. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
(2008). French color blindness in perspective. French Politics, Culture & Society, 26(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3167/fpcs.2008.260101
(2010). Introduction. Diversité et formation des élites: France-USA
[Introduction. Diversity and training of elites: France-USA] . Sociétés contemporaines, 79( 3), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.3917/soco.079.0005(1999).
Immigration et acculturation [Immigration and acculturation] In R. Y. BourhisJ.-P. LeyensEds., Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes. Brussels: Mardaga, 261–291.(2010). The ideological legitimation of the status quo: Longitudinal tests of a social dominance model. Political Psychology (pp. 109–137). 31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00747.x
(2006). Toward a social representations theory of attitude change: The effect of message framing on general and specific attitudes toward equality and entitlement. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35, 3–13.
(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476
(2000).
The politics of race . In D. O. SearsJ. SidaniusL. BoboEds., Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 236–279). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.493
(2011). The merit of meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024618
(2014, July). Attitudes toward affirmative action programs and their beneficiaries in French society: The role of social dominance orientation and belief in a just world. 22nd International Congress of International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Reims
(1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
(1986).
The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In S. WorchelW. G. AustinEds., Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.(2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and Right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1455–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.011
(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
(2000). Pluralistic ignorance and political correctness: The case of affirmative action. Political Psychology, 21, 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00187
(1989). Male acceptance of affirmative action programs for women: The results of altruistic or egoistical motives? International Journal of Psychology, 24, 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.1989.10600060
(2008). Compensation versus halo: The unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1110–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318602
