Diana Was Not Involved in the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks!
Or Was She? Newspaper Headlines and the Boomerang Effect
Abstract
Abstract. In this research, we investigated the social influence of newspaper headlines on beliefs on various social, political, and economic issues, including belief in conspiracy theories. Building on the seminal study by Gruenfeld and Wyer (1992), we examined how denials and affirmations printed in a credible source (e.g., a newspaper considered to be serious) versus a less credible source (e.g., a free newspaper) affected readers’ beliefs. In this computer-based study, participants were asked to rate the plausibility of 24 newspaper statements (eight of which were related to conspiracy theories), first without any mention of a newspaper and then with the newspapers mentioned as sources. The results showed the general effects associated with the degree of informativeness of the statements. We discuss these effects in terms of the boomerang effect (i.e., opinion change in the direction opposite to that of the opinion given in the headline). We also found that the participants judged the official versions of various events to be more plausible than the conspiracy theory versions of the same events.
References
(2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
(2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 695–721. doi 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00134-0
(2014). The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 323–335. doi 10.1037/ xap0000028
(1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–742. doi 10.2307/3791630
(1992). Semantics and pragmatics of social influence: How affirmations and denials affect beliefs in referent propositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 38–49. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.38
(1994). Conspiracies, contagion, and compassion: Trust and public reactions to AIDS. AIDS Education and Prevention, 6, 365–375.
(1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
(2014a). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9:e89177. doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
(2014b). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–56. doi 10.1111/bjop.12018
(1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96, 109–126. doi 10.2307/2564659
(2016). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models (R package version 2.0–33) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
(2015, June 8). Why you should use omega-squared instead of eta-squared [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://daniellakens.blogspot.ch/2015/06/why-you-should-use-omega-squared.html
(2013). NASA faked the moon landing – Therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633. doi 10.1177/0956797612457686
(2017). Médias imprimés: Evolution du nombre de titres et du tirage des journaux [
Printed media: Evolution of the number of newspaper titles and prints ] (OFS report No. je-f-16.03.01.01.01). Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Author.(2011). Readers’ reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 230–247. doi 10.1037/a0021331
(2004).
Relevance theory . In L. R. HornG. WardEds., The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi 10.1002/9780470756959(2011). Lay perceptions of collectives at the outbreak of the H1N1 epidemic: Heroes, villains, and victims. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 461–476. doi 10.1177/0963662510393605
(1981). Incrimination through innuendo: Can media questions become public answers? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 822–832. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.822
(2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773. doi 10.1177/ 1948550611434786
