Health is in the Eye of the Beholder
The Impact of Social Norms on Perceived Health Dispositions
Abstract
Abstract. The field of health practices is one in which broader cultural ideologies are expressed as well as one subjected to social regulations legitimized through widely valued and shared standards taken from mundane perceptions. In this research, we investigated how cultural ideologies, here operationalized as social norms, influence people’s perceptions of the state of health and health behavior of others. These perceptions were investigated in two independent studies using impression-management tasks. The participants were asked to judge a target with respect to socially valued characteristics that were not directly related to health: attractiveness (Study 1) and future orientation (Study 2). We found that broader and implicit ideologies indeed had an influence on the participants’ perceptions of the targets’ general state of health and participants’ attributions of health behaviors to the targets. Our results invite a more systematic analysis of the relationships between dominant sets of values and norms and health-related perceptions of others.
References
2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
(2009). The role of time perspective in smoking cessation among older English adults. Health Psychology, 28, 529–534. doi 10.1037/a0015198
(2012). Pensée sociale et risques dans le domaine de la santé: le regard des représentations sociales [
(Social thought and risks in the health field: The social representations perspective ]. Psychologie Française, 57, 67–81. doi 10.1016/j.psfr.2012.03.0032004). Validation française de l’échelle de temporalité: The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) [
(French validation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) ]. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 207–217. doi 10.1016/j.erap.2004.03.0012006). Cannabis use, time perspective and risk perception: Evidence of a moderating effect. Psychology & Health, 21, 571–592. doi 10.1080/14768320500422683
(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
(2003).
(Judgment norms, social utility, and individualism . In N. DuboisEd., A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 123–147). London, UK: Routledge.2005). Body work: The social construction of women’s body image. London, UK: Routledge.
(2006). La fonction évaluative de la personnologie, vers la mise en évidence de deux dimensions de la valeur: la désirabilité sociale et l’utilité sociale [
(The evaluative function of personality traits: Toward the focus on the two value dimensions of social desirability and social utility ]. Psychologie Française, 51, 285–305. doi 10.1016/j.psfr.2006.01.0032003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109. doi 10.1111/1467-8721.01242
(1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.261
(2010). Adaptation et validation française de l’échelle de perspective temporelle «consideration of future consequences?» (CFC) [
(French adaptation and validation of the time perspective scale called “consideration of future consequences” (CFC) ]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 63, 351–360. doi 10.3917/bupsy.509.03511972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290. doi 10.1037/h0033731
(1987). Belief in a just world and physical attractiveness stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 775–780. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.775
(2003).
(The concept of norm . In N. DuboisEd., A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 1–15). London, UK: Routledge.2009). La norme d’internalité et le libéralisme [
(The norm of inwardness and liberalism ] (rev. ed.). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146. doi 10.1002/ejsp.236
(2011). Are some rabbits more competent and warm than others? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70, 63–73. doi 10.1024/1421-0185/a000040
(1991). What is beautiful is good, but ...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
(2001). Psicología social y género: El sexo como objeto de representación social [
(Social psychology and gender: Sex as an object of social representation ]. Ciudad de México: Ed. McGraw-Hill/DGAPA.1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
(1979). Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France. [
(Birth of biopolitics: Lessons at the College of France ]. Paris, France: Seuil.2014). Discussing normative features of future time perspective construct: Renewing with the Lewinian approach from a sociocognitive perspective. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 1–10. doi 10.1016/j. newideapsych.2014.04.001
(2015). Looking to the future for being well-seen: Further evidences about the normative feature of the future time perspective. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 28, 7–23.
(2015). The PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.processmacro.org/
(2001).
(Les représentations sociales de la santé et la santé en mutation: un regard rétrospectif et prospectif sur la fécondité d’un concept [The social representations of health and changing health: A retrospective and prospective look at the fertility of a concept ]. In F. BuschiniN. KalampalikisEds., Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Mélanges en l’honneur de S. Moscovici (pp. 189–200). Paris, France: Editions de la MSH.1999). Risk and “the other.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). The centrality of the self-control ethos in Western aspersions regarding outgroups: A social representational approach to stereotype content. Culture & Psychology, 13, 395–418. doi 10.1177/1354067X07082750
(1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619. doi 10.1177/0193841X8100500502
(2007). La sociologie du corps [
(The sociology of body ]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.2010).
(Perceiving people . In S. T. FiskeD. T. GilbertG. LindzeyEds., The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 428–463). New York: McGraw-Hill.1999). Le corps et la beauté [
(Body and beauty ]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.2001).
(La santé publique comme projet politique et projet individuel [Public health as a political and individual project ]. In B. HoursEd., Systèmes et politiques de santé: De la santé publique à l’anthropologie (pp. 41–66). Paris, France: Karthala.2010). Current issues and new directions in psychology and health: What are the oughts? The adverse effects of using social norms in health communication. Psychology and Health, 25, 265–270. doi 10.1080/ 08870440903262812
(2006). Health psychology and social action. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 379–384. doi 10.1177/ 1359105306063308
(2003). Social representations of health and illness among “baby-boomers” in Eastern Canada. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 485–499. doi 10.1177/ 13591053030085002
(2002). The effects of face attractiveness on preselective recruitment. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 15–20. doi 10.1024//1421-0185.61.1.15
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
(2005). The psychology of appearance. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
(2008). It’s all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1193–1201. doi 10.1002/ejsp.539
(1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507. doi 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-7
(1960). La maladie, le malade et le médecin: Esquisse d’une analyse psychosociale [
(Illness, ill person, and physician: Sketch of a psychosocial analysis ]. Population (French Edition), 15, 613–624. doi 10.2307/15261282003).
(Conformity and deviance . In N. DuboisEd., A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 17–37). London, UK: Routledge.2004). Is beautiful always good? Implicit benefits of facial attractiveness. Social Cognition, 22, 637–649. doi 10.1521/soco.22.6.637.54819
(2005). Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 635–653. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.635
(2014). Instantaneously hotter: The dynamic revision of beauty assessment standards. Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 744–745. Retrieved from http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/v42/acr_v42_17500.pdf
(2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497–1517. doi 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00109.x
(1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
(1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023. doi 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-X
(