Skip to main content
Original Communication

Health is in the Eye of the Beholder

The Impact of Social Norms on Perceived Health Dispositions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000192

Abstract. The field of health practices is one in which broader cultural ideologies are expressed as well as one subjected to social regulations legitimized through widely valued and shared standards taken from mundane perceptions. In this research, we investigated how cultural ideologies, here operationalized as social norms, influence people’s perceptions of the state of health and health behavior of others. These perceptions were investigated in two independent studies using impression-management tasks. The participants were asked to judge a target with respect to socially valued characteristics that were not directly related to health: attractiveness (Study 1) and future orientation (Study 2). We found that broader and implicit ideologies indeed had an influence on the participants’ perceptions of the targets’ general state of health and participants’ attributions of health behaviors to the targets. Our results invite a more systematic analysis of the relationships between dominant sets of values and norms and health-related perceptions of others.

References

  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Adams, J. (2009). The role of time perspective in smoking cessation among older English adults. Health Psychology, 28, 529–534. doi 10.1037/a0015198 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Apostolidis, T., & Dany, L. (2012). Pensée sociale et risques dans le domaine de la santé: le regard des représentations sociales [Social thought and risks in the health field: The social representations perspective]. Psychologie Française, 57, 67–81. doi 10.1016/j.psfr.2012.03.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Apostolidis, T., & Fieulaine, N. (2004). Validation française de l’échelle de temporalité: The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) [French validation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI)]. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 207–217. doi 10.1016/j.erap.2004.03.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Apostolidis, T., Fieulaine, N., Simonin, L., & Rolland, G. (2006). Cannabis use, time perspective and risk perception: Evidence of a moderating effect. Psychology & Health, 21, 571–592. doi 10.1080/14768320500422683 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L. (2003). Judgment norms, social utility, and individualism. In N. DuboisEd., A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 123–147). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blood, S. K. (2005). Body work: The social construction of women’s body image. London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cambon, L. (2006). La fonction évaluative de la personnologie, vers la mise en évidence de deux dimensions de la valeur: la désirabilité sociale et l’utilité sociale [The evaluative function of personality traits: Toward the focus on the two value dimensions of social desirability and social utility]. Psychologie Française, 51, 285–305. doi 10.1016/j.psfr.2006.01.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109. doi 10.1111/1467-8721.01242 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C.-H. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.261 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demarque, C., Apostolidis, T., Chagnard, A., & Dany, L. (2010). Adaptation et validation française de l’échelle de perspective temporelle «consideration of future consequences?» (CFC) [French adaptation and validation of the time perspective scale called “consideration of future consequences” (CFC)]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 63, 351–360. doi 10.3917/bupsy.509.0351 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290. doi 10.1037/h0033731 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dion, K. L., & Dion, K. K. (1987). Belief in a just world and physical attractiveness stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 775–780. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.775 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dubois, N. (2003). The concept of norm. In N. DuboisEd., A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 1–15). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dubois, N. (2009). La norme d’internalité et le libéralisme [The norm of inwardness and liberalism] (rev. ed.). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J.-L. (2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146. doi 10.1002/ejsp.236 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J.-L. (2011). Are some rabbits more competent and warm than others? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70, 63–73. doi 10.1024/1421-0185/a000040 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but ...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flores-Palacios, F. (2001). Psicología social y género: El sexo como objeto de representación social [Social psychology and gender: Sex as an object of social representation]. Ciudad de México: Ed. McGraw-Hill/DGAPA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France. [Birth of biopolitics: Lessons at the College of France]. Paris, France: Seuil. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guignard, S., Apostolidis, T., & Demarque, C. (2014). Discussing normative features of future time perspective construct: Renewing with the Lewinian approach from a sociocognitive perspective. New Ideas in Psychology, 35, 1–10. doi 10.1016/j. newideapsych.2014.04.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guignard, S., Bertoldo, R., Goula, K., & Apostolidis, T. (2015). Looking to the future for being well-seen: Further evidences about the normative feature of the future time perspective. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 28, 7–23. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2015). The PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.processmacro.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Herzlich, C. (2001). Les représentations sociales de la santé et la santé en mutation: un regard rétrospectif et prospectif sur la fécondité d’un concept [The social representations of health and changing health: A retrospective and prospective look at the fertility of a concept]. In F. BuschiniN. KalampalikisEds., Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Mélanges en l’honneur de S. Moscovici (pp. 189–200). Paris, France: Editions de la MSH. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Joffe, H. (1999). Risk and “the other.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joffe, H., & Staerklé, C. (2007). The centrality of the self-control ethos in Western aspersions regarding outgroups: A social representational approach to stereotype content. Culture & Psychology, 13, 395–418. doi 10.1177/1354067X07082750 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619. doi 10.1177/0193841X8100500502 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Le Breton, D. (2007). La sociologie du corps [The sociology of body]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Macrae, C. N., & Quadflieg, S. (2010). Perceiving people. In S. T. FiskeD. T. GilbertG. LindzeyEds., The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 428–463). New York: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maisonneuve, J., & Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. (1999). Le corps et la beauté [Body and beauty]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Massé, R. (2001). La santé publique comme projet politique et projet individuel [Public health as a political and individual project]. In B. HoursEd., Systèmes et politiques de santé: De la santé publique à l’anthropologie (pp. 41–66). Paris, France: Karthala. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mollen, S., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2010). Current issues and new directions in psychology and health: What are the oughts? The adverse effects of using social norms in health communication. Psychology and Health, 25, 265–270. doi 10.1080/ 08870440903262812 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, M., & Poland, B. (2006). Health psychology and social action. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 379–384. doi 10.1177/ 1359105306063308 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, M., Pullman, D., & Rodgers, T. H. (2003). Social representations of health and illness among “baby-boomers” in Eastern Canada. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 485–499. doi 10.1177/ 13591053030085002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pansu, P., & Dubois, M. (2002). The effects of face attractiveness on preselective recruitment. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 15–20. doi 10.1024//1421-0185.61.1.15 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rumsey, N., & Harcourt, D. (2005). The psychology of appearance. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, A. M. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2008). It’s all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1193–1201. doi 10.1002/ejsp.539 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507. doi 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stoetzel, J. (1960). La maladie, le malade et le médecin: Esquisse d’une analyse psychosociale [Illness, ill person, and physician: Sketch of a psychosocial analysis]. Population (French Edition), 15, 613–624. doi 10.2307/1526128 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Testé, B. (2003). Conformity and deviance. In N. DuboisEd., A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 17–37). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Leeuwen, M. L., & Macrae, C. N. (2004). Is beautiful always good? Implicit benefits of facial attractiveness. Social Cognition, 22, 637–649. doi 10.1521/soco.22.6.637.54819 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005). Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 635–653. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.635 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yang, H., & Lee, L. (2014). Instantaneously hotter: The dynamic revision of beauty assessment standards. Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 744–745. Retrieved from http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/v42/acr_v42_17500.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497–1517. doi 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00109.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023. doi 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar