Motives for Social Isolation Following a Negative Emotional Episode
Abstract
Abstract. After experiencing an emotional event, people either seek out others’ presence (social affiliation) or avoid others’ presence (social isolation). The determinants and effects of social affiliation are now well-known, but social psychologists have not yet thoroughly studied social isolation. This study aims to ascertain which motives and corresponding regulation strategies participants report for social isolation following negative emotional events. A group of 96 participants retrieved from memory an actual negative event that led them to temporarily socially isolate themselves and freely listed up to 10 motives for social isolation. Through semantic categorization of the 423 motives reported by the participants, we found that “cognitive clarification” and “keeping one’s distance” – that is, the need for cognitive regulation and the refusal of socioaffective regulation, respectively – were the most commonly and quickly reported motives for social isolation. We discuss the findings in terms of ideas for future studies aimed at clarifying the role of social isolation in health situations.
References
(1985). Gender differences in loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 63–74. doi 10.1177/ 0146167285111006
(2013). The regulation of negative and positive affect in daily life. Emotion, 13, 926–939. doi 10.1037/a0032400
(2009). The group effect: Social cohesion and health outcomes. New York: Springer-Verlag.
(2000). Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. American Psychologist, 55, 205–217. doi 10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.205
(2002). Emotions et interactions sociales: l’affiliation et l’isolement comme modes de régulation personnelle et sociale [
Emotions and social interactions: Social affiliation and isolation as ways of individual and social regulation ]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lille, France.(2014).
Régulation émotionnelle et valeur sociale: réévaluer ses émotions pour se sentir à l’aise et pour bien agir [Emotion regulation and social value: Reevaluating one’s emotions to feel at ease and to act right ]. In V. ChristopheC. DucroP. AntoineEds., Psychologie de la Santé: Individu, famille et société (pp. 193–196). Lille, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.(2004). Les motifs allégués du partage social et de la rumination mentale des émotions: comparaison des épisodes positifs et négatifs [
Alleged motives for social sharing and mental rumination of emotions: A comparison of positive and negative episodes ]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 64, 35–44. doi 10.3917/cips.064.0035(2015). Motives for the social sharing of an emotional experience. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 757–787. doi 10.1177/0265407514548393
(1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.224
(2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
(1998).
Social ties and cancer . In J. C. HollandW. BreitbartEds., Psycho-oncology (pp. 99–109). New York: Oxford University Press.(1992). The social stigma of loneliness: Effect of target person’s and perceiver’s sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 182–189. doi 10.1177/0146167292182009
(2014). Régulations endogène et exogène des émotions: des processus indissociables [Endogenous and exogenous emotion regulation: Complementary and indivisible processes]. Psychologie Française, 59, 183–197. doi 10.1016/j.psfr.2013.10.001
(1989). Loneliness: A theoretical review with implications for measurement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 93–128. doi 10.1177/026540758900600107
(2012). An attachment perspective on psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 11, 11–15. doi 10.1016/ j.wpsyc.2012.01.003
(2015). Responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 67–71. doi 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.001
(2007).
Interpersonal emotion regulation . In J. J. GrossEd., Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–485). New York: Guilford.(2011). Loneliness, social isolation and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. Health Psychology, 30, 377–385. doi 10.1037/a0022826
(2011). Emotion regulation choice. Psychological Science, 22, 1391–1396. doi 10.1177/ 0956797611418350
(1986). Gender differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1069–1074. doi 10.1037/0022-3514. 51.5.1069
(2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 2–30. doi 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1
(2000). Social isolation and gender. Current Psychology, 19, 229–236. doi 10.1007/s12144-000-1017-5
(2013). The development of loneliness from mid- to late adolescence: Trajectory classes, personality traits, and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1305–1312. doi 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.002
(1988). Marriage and the psychological consequences of a heart attack: A longitudinal study of adaptation to chronic illness after 3 years. Social Science and Medicine, 27, 149–158. doi 10.1007/978-3-642-84312-9_3
(1997).
Modes and families of coping: An analysis of downward comparison in the structure of other cognitive and behavioral mechanisms . In B. P. BuunkF. X. GibbonsEds., Health, coping, and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory (pp. 167–193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
