Differential Effects of Competence and Morality on Self-Esteem at the Individual and the Collective Level
Abstract
Abstract. The importance of various trait dimensions explaining positive global self-esteem has been the subject of numerous studies. While some have provided support for the importance of agency, others have highlighted the importance of communion. This discrepancy can be explained, if one takes into account that people define and value their self both in individual and in collective terms. Two studies (N = 367 and N = 263) examined the extent to which competence (an aspect of agency), morality, and sociability (the aspects of communion) promote high self-esteem at the individual and the collective level. In both studies, competence was the strongest predictor of self-esteem at the individual level, whereas morality was the strongest predictor of self-esteem at the collective level.
References
2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness – Communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810
(2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
(2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
(1993). When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure: Negative consequences of high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.141
(1985). Self-esteem and responses to success and failure: Subsequent performance and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality, 53, 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00376.x
(2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 269–309.
(2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397
(2011). Looking for honesty: the Primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
(2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x
(1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
(2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
(2019). Does self-esteem have an interpersonal imprint beyond self-reports? A meta-analysis of self-esteem and objective interpersonal indicators. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318756532
(2004). In case of death, cling to the ingroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.211
(2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593
(1999). Reading and mathematics attainments and self-esteem in years 2 and 6-an eight-year cross-sectional study. Educational Studies, 25, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055699997873
(2002). Self-esteem and persistence in the face of failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.711
(1998). Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.178
(2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134
(2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 160–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2013.841490
(2008). Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1397–1410. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012628
(2012). Morality in groups: On the social-regulatory functions of right and wrong. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 878–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12001
(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
(2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.014
(2013). Agency-communion and self-esteem relations are moderated by culture, religiosity, age, and sex: Evidence for the “self-centrality breeds self-enhancement” principle. Journal of Personality, 81, 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00807.x
(1993). Effects of self-esteem on vulnerability-denying defensive distortions: Further evidence of an anxiety- buffering function of self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1993.1010
(1992). Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 913–922. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.913
(2020). Bridgesampling: An R package for estimating normalizing constants. Journal of Statistical Software, 92, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v092.i10
(2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
(1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052001123
(1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduced mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.24
(2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
(2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits – self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
(2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693
(2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 675–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000046
(2014). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. London, UK: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405888-0.00008-8
(2015).
(Groups and morality . In M. MikulincerP. R. ShaverJ. F. DovidioJ. A. SimpsonEds., APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2. Group processes (pp. 123–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
(2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9
(1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518
(2019). Understand and describe Bayesian models and posterior distributions using bayestestR. Retrieved from https://github.com/easystats/bayestestR
(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
(2014). Is self-esteem a cause or consequence of social support? A 4-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 85, 1275–1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12176
(1984). On knowing when to quit: Task failure, self-esteem, advice, and nonproductive persistence. Journal of Personality, 52, 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1984.tb00349.x
(1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives invitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral- adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211–231.
(1995). Self-investment and self-esteem: Evidence for a Jamesian model of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1141
(2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 435–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435
(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400876136
(1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096350
(1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026086
(1977). Self-evaluations, initial success and failure, and improvement as determinants of persistence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 784–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.45.5.784
(2020). Enhancing implicit individual and collective self-esteem by agency or communion-based subliminal evaluative conditioning. Manuscript submitted for publication
(2015). Striving for group agency: Threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00649
(2002). Decomposing global self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 70, 443–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05017
(1986).
(The social identity theory of inter group behavior . In S. WorchelW. AustinEds., Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
(2015). Does it pay to be moral? How indicators of morality and competence enhance organizational and work team attractiveness. British Journal of Management, 26, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12055
(2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
(2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
(2010). Perceiving your group’s future to be in jeopardy: Extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210372505
(2005). Morality and competence in person and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280500229619
(2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973–990. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.595
(2011). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.791
(1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412001
(2014). Agency versus communion as predictors of self-esteem: Searching for the role of culture and self-construal. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 45, 469–479. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2014-0057
(2001). Young and old adults’ concerns about morality and competence. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010633908298
(