When Does Imagined Contact Reduce Prejudice?
No Evidence That In-Group Identification Moderates the Imagined Contact Effect
Abstract
Abstract. Imagined contact has been argued to reduce prejudice. Although extant research supports this argument, replication attempts have been unsuccessful. To resolve conflicting evidence from previous studies, this study examined the effect of imagined contact on explicit and implicit prejudice against Kurds and Syrians in Turkey. Using data from 335 Turkish undergraduate students, the moderating role of ethnic and national identification in the imagined contact effect was tested. Results indicated that imagined contact did not reduce prejudice, and in-group identification did not have a moderating effect, even after controlling for actual contact. These findings call for a theoretical refinement to the imagined contact hypothesis and emphasize the need for further research to advance our understanding of when imagined contact works.
References
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2018). The politics of Syrian refugees in Turkey: A question of inclusion and exclusion through citizenship. Social Inclusion, 6, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1323
(1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison Wesley.
(2017). Identity management strategies and outgroup favoritism of Kurds living in Turkey (Master’s thesis, Uludağ University). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2ORAayX
(2013). Unwilling, but not unaffected: Imagined contact effects for authoritarians and social dominators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1956
(2017a). Etnik ve ulusal kimlikler ile dış grup tutumları ilişkisinde çatışma algısı ve dış gruba sorumluluk yükleme
[Ethnic and national identities: Links to outgroup attitudes via attribution of responsibility and perceived interethnic conflict] . Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 32, 63–79.(2017b). Cross-group friendships and outgroup attitudes among Turkish-Kurdish ethnic groups: Does perceived interethnic conflict moderate the friendship-attitude link? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12413
(2017c). Gruplararası temas ve çatışma ile azınlıklara yönelik tutumlar ve çokkültürlülüğe destek arasındaki ilişkiler: Gruplararası tehdit ve kaygının aracı rolü
[Effects of intergroup contact and conflict on attitudes and multiculturalism: The mediating role of intergroup threat and anxiety] . Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20, 3–18.(2018). Are your cross-ethnic friends ethnic and/or national group identifiers? The role of own and perceived cross-ethnic friend’s identities on outgroup attitudes and multiculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 036–050. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2278
(2017). Discrimination towards ethnic minorities: How does it relate to majority group members’ outgroup attitudes and support for multiculturalism. Social Justice Research, 30, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0281-6
(2018). Think beyond contact: Reformulating imagined intergroup contact theory by adding friendship potential. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 1034–1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843021769
(2018). Imagined contact in high conflict settings: The role of ethnic group identification and the perspective of minority group members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12485
(2019). When imagining intergroup contact mobilizes collective action: The perspective of disadvantaged and advantaged groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 69, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.12.003
(2019). Intended, unintended, and unknown consequences of contact: The role of positive-negative contact on outgroup attitudes, collective action tendencies, and psychological well-being. Social Psychology, 50, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000355
(2013). The roles of intergroup threat, social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism in predicting Turks’ prejudice toward Kurds. (Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616457/index.pdf
(2018). Reconciliation and intergroup forgiveness: The case of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 19, 748–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2018.1484287
(2018). Can identification as Muslim increase support for reconciliation? The case of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.02.002
(2014). The downsides of national identification for minority groups in intergroup conflicts in assimilationist societies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12012
(2014). Psychological asymmetry in minority-majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.09.002
(2012). Imagining intergroup contact is more cognitively difficult for people higher in intergroup anxiety but this does not detract from its effectiveness. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 744–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212443867
(2019). Imagining contact reduces prejudice in pre-school children. Social Development, 28, 1054–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12374
(1925). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.
(1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
(2014). Out-group trust and conflict understandings: The perspective of Turks and Kurds in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.02.002
(2016). Support for Kurdish language rights in Turkey: The roles of ethnic group, group identifications, contact, and intergroup perceptions. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39, 1034–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.110
(2010).
Turkey: The Kurdish question and the coercive state . In T. PaffenholzEd., Civil society and peace building: A critical assessment (pp. 153–179). Rienner.(2017). Stereotype reduction through humor and accommodation during imagined communication with older adults. Communication Monographs, 84, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1149737
(2016). Avoiding cultural contamination: Intergroup disgust sensitivity and religious identification as predictors of interfaith threat, faith-based policies, and islamophobia. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.013
(2005). Reducing intergroup bias: The moderating role of ingroup identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051066
(2014). Reducing prejudice through mental imagery: Notes on replication, interpretation, and generalization. Psychological Science, 25, 840–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613520169
(2014). Support for the replicability of imagined contact effects. Social Psychology, 45, 303–304. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000202
(2009). Imagined intergroup contact: Theory, paradigm, and practice. Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00155.x
(2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014718
(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
(2019). Syrian refugees minors in Turkey: Why and how are they discriminated against and ostracized? Child Indicators Research, 12, 1989–2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-9622-3
(2013). The failure of imagined contact in reducing explicit and implicit out-group prejudice toward male homosexuals. Current Psychology, 32, 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9182-5
(2013). Yoğun göç almış metropollerde etniklik ve öteki ile ilişki
[Ethnicity and relation with the other in immigrant intensive metropolitan cities] . Sosyoloji Dergisi, 27, 1–24.(2015). Can imagined contact favor the “humanization” of the homeless? TPM – Testing, Psychometrics. Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM22.1.2
(2014). Imagined contact favors humanization of individuals with intellectual disabilities: A two-wave study. Life Span and Disability, 17, 39–57.
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
(2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
(2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
(2017). Effects of past and present intergroup communication on perceived fit of an outgroup member and desire for future intergroup contact. Communication Research, 44, 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565926
(2011). Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X524263
(2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2014). Dimensions of social dominance orientation: The roles of legitimizing myths and national identification. European Journal of Personality, 28, 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1955
(2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018
(2015). Can (elaborated) imagined contact interventions reduce prejudice among those higher in intergroup disgust sensitivity (ITG-DS)? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12281
(2017).
The role of personality in intergroup contact . In L. VezzaliS. StathiEds., Intergroup contact theory: Recent developments and future directions (pp. 8–30). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.(2016). Who needs imagined contact? Replication attempts examining previous contact as a potential moderator. Social Psychology, 47, 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000258
(2010). Elaboration enhances the imagined contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.014
(2019). How the interplay of imagined contact and first-person narratives improves attitudes toward stigmatized immigrants: A conditional process model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2509
(2017). Inducing similarities and differences in imagined contact: A mutual intergroup differentiation approach. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612221
(2017). Syrian refugees higher education crisis. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 9, 10–14.
(2015). The role of social dominance orientation, empathy and perceived threat in predicting prejudice of Turkish citizens toward Syrian immigrants (Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12619365/index.pdf
(2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
(2016). Syrian refugees in Turkey: From “guests” to “enemies?”. New Perspectives on Turkey, 54, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2016.4
. (2011). Kürt meselesinde algı ve beklentiler
[Perceptions and expectations in the Kurdish issue] . Istanbul, Turkey: İletişim.(2019). Predisposed to prejudice but responsive to intergroup contact? Testing the unique benefits of intergroup contact across different types of individual differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217716750
(2013). Cooperation makes it happen: Imagined intergroup cooperation enhances the positive effects of imagined contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212470172
(2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765–1785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036260
(2014). Public opinion in Hong Kong about gays and lesbians: The impact of interpersonal and imagined contact. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu016
(2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
(2015). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2079
(2016). Homonegativity in Italy: Cultural issues, personality characteristics, and demographic correlates with negative attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0197-6
(2014). Treating prejudice with imagery: Easier said than done? Psychological Science, 25, 837–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516010
(2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573
. (2017). Inquisit Lab 5.0.10.0 Millisecond Software. [Computer software].
(1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
(2017). The role of contact and the perception of threat in prejudice towards Syrians in Turkey (Master’s thesis, Boğaziçi University). Retrieved from http://seyhan.library.boun.edu.tr/record=b1842124~S5
(2012). Imagined intergroup contact promotes cooperation through outgroup trust. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212450057
(2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. New York, NY: Open University Press.
(2017). The single factor fallacy: Implications of missing critical variables from an analysis of intergroup contact theory. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11, 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12026
(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
(2010). Personal value priorities and national identification. Political Psychology, 31, 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00763.x
(2019). Can imagination reduce prejudice over time? A preregistered test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2019.1579719
(2018). Imagined intergroup physical contact improves attitudes toward immigrants. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01685
(2012). A 21 word solution. Dialogue, 26, 4–7. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588
(1996). Pathways to prejudice: Predicting students’ heterosexist attitudes with demographics, self-esteem, and contact with lesbians and gay men. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 68–78.
(2019). Childhood experiences and intergroup biases among children. Social Issues and Policy Review, 13, 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12054
(2014). Imagined contact as a prejudice-reduction intervention in schools: The underlying role of similarity and attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12245
(2008). Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 943–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.003
(2011). Imagining intergroup contact enables member-to-group generalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15, 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023752
(2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
(2018). Ulusal kimliğin sınırlarını tanımlama biçimleri ve Türkiye’ye gelen Suriyeli sığınmacılara yönelik tutumlar
[Definitions of national identity boundaries and attitudes toward Syrian refugees in Turkey] . Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 21, 3–18.(2007). Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X155150
(2010). Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X419901
(2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207081533
(2013). Out-group trust, intergroup anxiety, and out-group attitude as mediators of the effect of imagined intergroup contact on intergroup behavioral tendencies: Mediators and consequences of imagined contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(S2), E196–E205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12019
(2017). “If we become friends, maybe I can change my perspective:” Intergroup contact, endorsement of conflict narratives, and peace-related attitudes in Turkey. Peace and Conflict, 23, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000216
(2019). Examining the ethos of conflict by exploring lay people’s representations of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 36, 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894216674969
. (2019). UNHCR data portal: Syria regional refugee response, Retrieved from https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria
(2012). Improving implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes using imagined contact: An experimental intervention with elementary school children. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211424920
(2015). Comparing direct and imagined intergroup contact among children: Effects on outgroup stereotypes and helping intentions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.06.009
(2015). Imagined intergroup contact and common ingroup identity: An integrative approach. Social Psychology, 46, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a00024
(2019). The interplay between social dominance orientation and intergroup contact in explaining support for multiculturalism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12587
(2017). The role of multicultural and colorblind ideologies and typicality in imagined contact interventions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 59, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.04.010
(2013). Nice and easy does it: How perceptual fluency moderates the effectiveness of imagined contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.007
(2011). Enhancing imagined contact to reduce prejudice against people with schizophrenia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210387805
(2017). Imagined contact can be more effective for participants with stronger initial prejudices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12437
(1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73
(2018). Türklerin ve Kürtlerin birbirlerine karşı olumsuz tutumlarının bazı psikolojik değişkenlerle ilişkisi
[Psychological correlates of negative attitudes of Turks and Kurds toward one another] . Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 21, 82–99.(2018a). Feelings toward refugees and non-Muslims in Turkey: The roles of national and religious identifications, and multiculturalism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12493
(2018b). Positive and negative behavioral intentions towards refugees in Turkey: The roles of national identification, threat, and humanitarian concern. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 28, 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2354
(2019). The extended contact hypothesis: A meta-analysis on 20 years of research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 132–160. https://doi.org/1088868318762647a
