Facial Appearance and Electoral Success of Male Italian Politicians
Are Trustworthy-Looking Candidates More Successful in Corrupt Regions?
Abstract
Abstract. People rely on the facial appearance of political candidates when voting. Here, we examine whether the perceived competence, trustworthiness, and attractiveness of male Italian mayoral candidates (n = 150) predict their electoral success. Building on situational leadership theory, we also examine whether associations between apparent traits and electoral success are moderated by contextual factors. Specifically, we test whether trustworthy-looking politicians are more successful in Southern Italy where political corruption is a more salient issue. Across three preregistered studies (N = 470), we find that attractive-looking candidates were more successful. Perceived competence and trustworthiness were not consistently associated with electoral success. Moreover, we do not find evidence that regional variation in corruption moderates the success of trustworthy-looking politicians.
References
2009). Predicting elections: Child’s play!. Science, 323, 1183. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167748
(2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(46), 17948–17953. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705435104
(2010). The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002
(2017). The right look: Conservative politicians look better and voters reward it. Journal of Public Economics, 146, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.12.008
(2016). Amoral familism, social capital, or trust? The behavioural foundations of the Italian North–South divide. Economic Journal, 126(594), 1318–1341. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12292
(2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
(2016). The gendered face of partisan politics: Consequences of facial sex typicality for vote choice. Political Communication, 33(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.958260
(2009). The effects of perceived competence and sociability on electoral outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1152–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.018
(2012). “I” value competence but “we” value social competence: The moderating role of voters’ individualistic and collectivistic orientation in political elections. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1350–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.006
(2014). The looks of a leader: Competent and trustworthy, but not dominant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.008
(2016). Culture matters: The looks of a leader are not all the same. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616644962
(2008). The political gender gap: Gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior. PLoS One, 3(10), Article e3666 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003666
(2012). Predicting the present with Google Trends. Economic Record, 88, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.00809.x
(1996). Why did the incumbency advantage in U.S. House elections grow? American Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111633
(1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261
(2007). The determinants of corruption in Italy: Regional panel data analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.03.004
(2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.293
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
(2019). Context-specific effects of facial dominance and trustworthiness on hypothetical leadership decisions. PLoS One, 14(7), Article e0214261 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214261
(2012). Corruption and growth: Evidence from Italian regions. European Journal of Government and Economics, 1(2), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2012.1.2.4281
(2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
(2016). SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
(2014). Early processing of gendered facial cues predicts the electoral success of female politicians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614534701
(2015). Picking teams: When dominant facial structure is preferred. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.007
(2018). Assessing the point at which averages are stable: A tool illustrated in the context of person perception. https://psyarxiv.com/2n6jq/
(1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027347
(2020). A catwalk to congress? Appearance-based effects in the elections to the US House of Representatives 2016. American Politics Research, 48(4), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X19875710
(2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00133
(2009). Beautiful politicians. Kyklos, 62(4), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(83)90040-5
(2016). Do we spontaneously form stable trustworthiness impressions from facial appearance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000062
(2000).
(Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion . In A. LupiaM. D. McCubbinsS. L. PoppkinEds., Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 153–182). Cambridge University Press.2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
(2015). Does a competent leader make a good friend? Conflict, ideology and the psychologies of friendship and followership. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(4), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.001
(2011). Looking the part: Television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates’ appearance. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 574–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00511.x
(2018). Inferring whether officials are corruptible from looking at their faces. Psychological Science, 29(11), 1807–1823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618788882
(2015). Cross-regional comparison of corruption. 4th International Conference on Economics, Political and Law Science, 118–124. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2015/Rome/EPLS/EPLS-14.pdf
(2014). Facial appearance and leader choice in different contexts: Evidence for task contingent selection based on implicit and learned face-behaviour/face-ability associations. Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.002
(2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.002
(2012). The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(10), 2018–2032. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.677048
(2014). Pretty faces, marginal races: Predicting election outcomes using trait assessments of British parliamentary candidates. Electoral Studies, 34, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.004
(1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. The American Political Science Review, 80(2), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958272
(2014). The Five Star Movement: Exception or vanguard in Europe? The International Spectator, 49(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2013.875821
(2014). The many (distinctive) faces of leadership: Inferring leadership domain from facial appearance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 817–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.002
(2010a). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1
(2010b). Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.002
(2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 24(5), 607–640. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.607
(1980). The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections. The American Political Science Review, 74(3), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958151
(1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962487
(2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
. (2017). Distinctive facial cues predict leadership rank and selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(9), 1311–1322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217712989
(2008). The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research, 47(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00720.x
(2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017673
(2012). Warriors and peacekeepers: Testing a biosocial implicit leadership hypothesis of intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces. PLoS One, 7(1), Article e30399 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030399
(2013). Competence ratings in US predict presidential election outcomes in Bulgaria. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 771–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.003
(2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589
(2014). Misleading first impressions: Different for different facial images of the same person. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1404–1417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614532474
(1997). The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections. The Journal of Politics, 59(1), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998224
(2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
(1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207
(