Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Lay Theories of Heroism and Leadership

The Role of Gender, Communion, and Agency

Published Online:July 02, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000422

Abstract

Abstract. Whereas leadership is generally perceived as a masculine enterprise, heroism research suggests that people view heroes as similarly masculine, but having more feminine traits. We predicted that heroes will be evaluated higher than leaders in communion but not differ in agency. In Study 1, heroes were perceived to have higher communion and similarly high agency as leaders. In Studies 2 and 3, we replicated these trait ratings focusing on perceptions of typical heroes/leaders (S2) and personal heroes/leaders (S3). In Study 4, we showed that the greater level of communion associated with heroes is independent of their gender. In Study 5, using an implicit association test, we showed there is a stronger implicit association of communion with heroes than leaders.

References

  • Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness – Communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allison, S. T. (2019). Heroic consciousness. Heroism Science, 4, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.26736/hs.2019.01.13 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Allison, S. T., & Goethals, G. R. (2011). Heroes: What they do and why we need them. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Allison, S. T., & Goethals, G. R. (2013). Heroic leadership: An influence taxonomy of 100 exceptional individuals. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allison, S. T., Goethals, G. R., & Kramer, R. M. (2017). Setting the scene: The rise and coalescence of heroism science. In S. T. AllisonG. R. GoethalsR. M. KramerEds., Handbook of heroism and heroic leadership (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, S. W., & Eagly, A. H. (2004). The heroism of women and men. American Psychologist, 59, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.3.163 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Sherman, J. S. (1999). On the dialectics of discrimination: Dual processes in social stereotyping. In S. ChaikenY. TropeEds., Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 271–290). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current reappraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00018.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, T., Gillaspy, J. A. Jr., & Thompson, B. (1997). The factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI): Confirmatory analysis of long and short forms. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057001008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2001). Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00232 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carpenter, T. P., Pogacar, R., Pullig, C., Kouril, M., Aguilar, S., LaBouff, J., … Chakroff, A. (2019). Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2194–2208. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. DenmarkM. A. PaludiEds., Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories (pp. 7–39). Westport, CT: Greenwood. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dik, B. J., Shimizu, A. B., & O’Connor, W. E. (2017). Career development and a sense of calling: Contexts for heroism. In S. T. AllisonG. R. GoethalsR. M. KramerEds., Handbook of heroism and heroic leadership. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dodge, K. A., Gilroy, F. D., & Fenzel, L. M. (1995). Requisite management characteristics revisited: Two decades later. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10, 253–264. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dunning, D., & Sherman, D. A. (1997). Stereotypes and tacit inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.459 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. (2004). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. In D. van KnippenbergM. A. HoggEds., Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 79–93). London, UK: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. EckesH. M. TrautnerEds., The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., & Van Engen, M. L. (2017). Women and men as leaders. In G. R. GoethalsC. L. HoytEds., Women and leadership: History, theories, and case studies (pp. 3–10). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth, then competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition, from brains to culture. New York, NY: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Forsyth, D., & Nye, J. (2008). Seeing and being a leader: The perceptual, cognitive, and interpersonal roots of conferred influence. In C. L. HoytG. R. GoethalsD. R. ForsythEds., Leadership at the crossroads: Psychology and leadership. Westport, CT: Praeger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B., & Riches, A. (2011). The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023780 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Riches, A., Lee, B., & Dunlop, W. L. (2012). Hierarchical integration of agency and communion: A study of influential moral figures. Journal of Personality, 80, 1117–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00764.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gash, H., & Conway, P. (1997). Images of heroes and heroines: How stable? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(97)80005-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goethals, G. R., & Allison, S. T. (2019). The romance of heroism and heroic leadership: Ambiguity, attribution, and apotheosis. West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guillén, L., Mayo, M., & Korotov, K. (2015). Is leadership a part of me? A leader identity approach to understanding the motivation to lead. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 802–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.05.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2005). Attributional rationalization of women’s success in mixed-sex teams: No credit where credit is due. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.905 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoyt, C. L. (2010). Women, men, and leadership: Exploring the gender gap at the top. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00274.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoyt, C. L., & Goethals, G. R. (2017). Women and leadership: History, theories, and case studies. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyt, C. L., & Murphy, S. (2016). Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoyt, C. L., & Simon, S. (2017). Social psychological approaches to women and leadership theory. In S. MadsenEd., Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 85–99). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kinsella, E. L., Ritchie, T. D., & Igou, E. R. (2015). Zeroing in on heroes: A prototype analysis of hero feature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038463 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kinsella, E. L., Ritchie, T. D., & Igou, E. R. (2017). On the bravery and courage of heroes: Considering gender. Heroism Science, 2, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26736/hs.2017.01.04 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Le, B. M., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., Webster, G. D., & Cheng, C. (2012). The personal and interpersonal rewards of communal orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512466227 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lord, R., & Maher, K. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Cambridge, MA: Unwin Hyman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Martinko, M. J., Randolph-Seng, B., Shen, W., Brees, J. R., Mahoney, K. T., & Kessler, S. R. (2018). An examination of the influence of implicit theories, attribution styles, and performance cues on questionnaire measures of leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25, 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817720384 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moreland, R. L.Levine, J. M. (Eds.). (2006). Socialization in organization and work groups. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Murphy, H. (2018, March 16). Draw a leader. What’s she like? Trick question!. The New York Times, p. A1. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nye, J. L., & Forsyth, D. R. (1991). The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals: A test of leadership categorization theory. Small Group Research, 22, 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491223005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rankin, L. E., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Is his heroism hailed and hers hidden? Women, men, and the social construction of heroism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00455.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, M. P., & Venter, A. (2010). Defining heroes through deductive and inductive investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366602 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weinberg, J., Freese, J., & Mcelhattan, D. (2014). Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociological Science, 1, 292–310. https://doi.org/10.15195/v1.a19 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles, 73, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0480-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar