Skip to main content
Original Article

I Saw That

Being Observed Reduces Race-Based Shoot Decisions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000402

Abstract. The shooter bias effect reveals that individuals are quicker to “shoot” armed Black (vs. White) men and slower to “not shoot” unarmed Black (vs. White) men in a computer task. In three studies (N = 386), we examined whether being observed would reduce this effect because of social desirability concerns. Participants completed a “shooting” task with or without a camera/live observer supposedly recording behavior. Cameras were strapped to participants’ heads (Studies 1a/1b) and pointed at them (Study 1b). In Study 2, a researcher observed participants complete the task while “filming” them with a smartphone. We replicated the shooter bias, but observation only reduced the effect in Study 2. These results reveal that being observed can reduce the shooter bias effect.

References

  • Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A., & Sutherland, A. (2015). The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 509–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., … Henderson, R. (2016). Wearing body cameras increases assaults against officers and does not reduce police use of force: Results from a global multi-site experiment. European Journal of Criminology, 136, 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370816643734 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler, M. S., & Keesee, T. (2007). Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1006–1023. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Goyle, A. (2011). Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cox, W. T. L., Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., & Schwartz, L. L. (2014). Toward a comprehensive understanding of officers’ shooting decisions: No simple answers to this complex problem. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2014.923312 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glaser, J., & Knowles, E. D. (2008). Implicit motivation to control prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • James, L., James, S. M., & Vila, B. J. (2016). The reverse racism effect: Are cops more hesitant to shoot black than white suspects? American Society of Criminology, 15, 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12187 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • James, L., Klinger, D., & Vila, B. (2014). Racial and ethnic bias in decisions to shoot seen through a stronger lens: Experimental results from high-fidelity laboratory simulations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9204-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • James, L., Vila, B., & Daratha, K. (2013). Results from experimental trials testing participant responses to White, Hispanic and Black suspects in high-fidelity deadly force judgment and decision-making simulations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9163-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahn, K. B., & Davies, P. G. (2017). What influences shooter bias? The effects of suspect race, neighborhood, and clothing on decisions to shoot. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 723–743. https://doi.org/10.111/josi.12245 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenworthy, J. B., Barden, M. A., Diamon, S., & del Carmen, A. (2011). Ingroup identification as a moderator of racial bias in a shoot-no shoot decision task. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210392932 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mekawi, Y., & Bresin, K. (2015). Is the evidence from racial bias shooting task studies a smoking gun? Results from a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled process in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K., Lambert, A. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2002). Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00006-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plant, E. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2005). The consequences of race for police officer’s responses to criminal suspects. Psychological Science, 16, 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00800.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, M. D. (2007). Lives lived in milliseconds: Using cognitive methods in personality research. In R. W. RobbinsR. C. FraleyR. KruegerEds., Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 345–359). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Rompay, T. J. L., Vonk, D. J., & Fransen, M. L. (2009). The eye of the camera: Effects of security cameras on prosocial behavior. Environmental Behavior, 41, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507309996 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wahl, G. M., Islam, T., Gardner, B., Marr, A. B., Hunt, J. P., McSwain, N. E., … Duchesne, J. (2010). Red light cameras: Do they change driver behavior and reduce accidents. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care, 68, 515–518. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cf7f0e First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar