Intended, Unintended, and Unknown Consequences of Contact
The Role of Positive–Negative Contact on Outgroup Attitudes, Collective Action Tendencies, and Psychological Well-Being
Abstract
Abstract. We investigated the role of positive and negative contact on outgroup attitudes, collective action tendencies, and psychological well-being among minority (Kurds) and majority (Turks) group members in a conflict area (N = 527), testing ingroup identification, relative deprivation, and perceived discrimination as potential mediators in these associations. Contrary to recent research studies demonstrating the superiority of negative contact effects, positive contact was generally a stronger determinant of the dependent variables, directly and indirectly, in both groups, although negative contact also had some direct and indirect associations with the outcomes. Findings highlight the need to incorporate the role of positive and negative contact to provide a full understanding of the potential benefits/costs of the contact strategy in conflict settings.
References
(2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214556699
(2009). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.582
(1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(2013). Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict: Evidence, limitations, and potential. American Psychologist, 68, 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032603
(2018). Positive and negative intergroup contact: Interaction not asymmetry. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 784–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2365
(2017). Cross‐group friendships and outgroup attitudes among Turkish–Kurdish ethnic groups: Does perceived interethnic conflict moderate the friendship‐attitude link? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12413
(2018). Are your cross‐ethnic friends ethnic and/or national group identifiers? The role of own and perceived cross‐ethnic friend’s identities on outgroup attitudes and multiculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, O36–O50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2278
(2014). Are minority status children's cross‐ethnic friendships beneficial in a multiethnic context? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12028
(in press). Imagined contact facilitates acculturation, sometimes: Contradicting evidence from two socio-cultural settings. In Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology.
(2018). Cross‐group friendships and psychological well‐being: A dual pathway through social integration and empowerment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12267
(1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519409539961
(2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
(2009). Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X387089
(2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953
(2012). Rejection as a call to arms: Inter-racial hostility and support for political action as outcomes of race-based rejection in majority and minority groups. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02040.x
(2013). Friend or ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213477155
(2013). Xenophobia among youngsters: The effect of inter-ethnic contact. European Sociological Review, 29, 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr057
(2014). Psychological asymmetry in minority–majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.09.002
(2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470
(1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
(2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
(2016). Predicting support for collective action in the conflict between Turks and Kurds: Perceived threats as a mediator of intergroup contact and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 732–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216641303
(2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the ‘sedative’ effect of intergroup contact among Black and White students in South Africa. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 606–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02075.x
(1999). Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: Implications for the psychological well-being of university students. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.3.3.179
(2017). Ethnic identification, discrimination, and mental and physical health among Syrian refugees: The moderating role of identity needs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 832–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2299
(2014). Out-group trust and conflict understandings: The perspective of Turks and Kurds in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 40, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.02.002
(2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
(2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.697
(2010). “Let them eat harmony” prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410363366
(1994). The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among Black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 385–400.
(1993).
Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes . In D. M. MackieD. L. HamiltonEds., Affect, cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 137–166). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.(2000). Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1720–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02464.x
(2011). The transformation of Turkey: Redefining state and society from the Ottoman Empire to the modern era (Vol. 103). London, UK: IB Tauris.
(2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2052
(2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720202800704
(2009). Social identity, health and well-being: An emerging agenda for applied psychology. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00379.x
(2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216685291
(2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00441.x
(2006). Perceived discrimination, social support networks, and psychological well-being among three immigrant groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106286925
(2001). Rebels with a cause: Group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279012
(2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2016). Effects of majority members’ positive intergroup contact on minority members’ support for ingroup rights: Mobilizing or demobilizing effects? European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2194
(2008). The role of cross-racial/ethnic friendships in social adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1177–1183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1177
(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
. (2011). Kurt Meselesinde Algı ve Beklentiler
[Perceptions and Expectations in the Kurdish Issue] . Istanbul, Turkey: Iletisim Yayinlari.(2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001013
(2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
(2015). (How) does positive and negative extended cross‐group contact predict direct cross‐group contact and intergroup attitudes? European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2110
(2008). Can cross-group friendships influence minority students' well-being at historically white universities? Psychological Science, 19, 933–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02179.x
(2015). Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.030
(1998–2018). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1080
(2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723–1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210388667
(2014). Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2029
(2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262848
(1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232006
(1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
(2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to noncontacted outgroups? Social Psychology, 40, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55
(2016). In pursuit of three theories: Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033327
(2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00567.x
(2017). The single factor fallacy: Implications of missing critical variables from an analysis of intergroup contact theory. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11, 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12026
(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
(2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
(2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
(2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478
(2017). Intergroup contact as a predictor of violent and nonviolent collective action: Evidence from Syrian refugees and Lebanese nationals. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000234
(2012). Intergroup contact can undermine disadvantaged group members’ attributions to discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 714–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.003
(2016).
The irony of harmony: Past and new development . In L. VezzaliS. StathiEds., Intergroup contact theory: Recent developments and future directions (pp. 53–71). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.(2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
(2014). The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 921–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035754
(2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812009
(2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024450
(1979).
An integrative theory of intergroup conflict . In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.(2015). How does intergroup contact affect social change? Its impact on collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12127
(2013). Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği (PİOÖ): Türkçe uyarlama, geçerlik vegüvenirlik çalışması [
Psychological well-being scale: Adaptation to Turkish and study of reliability and validity ]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 374–384.(2006).
Stigma and intergroup contact among members of minority and majority status groups . In S. LevinC. van LaarEds., Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 171–191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.(2017). Intergroup contact and the potential for post-conflict reconciliation: Studies in Northern Ireland and South Africa. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000236
(2012). Cross‐ethnic friendships, perceived discrimination, and their effects on ethnic activism over time: A longitudinal investigation of three ethnic minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02050.x
(2016).
Recent developments in intergroup contact research: Affective processes, group status, and contact valence . In F. BarlowC. SibleyEds., Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice(2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
(2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
(2017). “If we become friends, maybe I can change my perspective:” Intergroup contact, endorsement of conflict narratives, and peace-related attitudes in Turkey. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000216
(2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
(2007). Religious group identification and inter-religious relations: A study Among Turkish Dutch Muslims. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078695
(2010). Intergroup contact and ingroup reappraisal: Examining the deprovincialization thesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510389015
(2011).
Identity motives . In S. J. SchwartzK. LuyckxV. L. VignolesEds., Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 403–432). New York, NY: Springer.(2017). How positive and negative contact relate to attitudes towards Roma: Comparing majority and high‐status minority perspectives. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2309
(2017). Impact of pre-war and post-war intergroup contact on intergroup relations and mental health: Evidence from a Bosnian sample. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000222
(2007, December). Partial aggregation for complex structural equation modeling (SEM) and small sample sizes: An illustration using a multi-stakeholder model of cooperative interorganisational relationships (IORs) in product innovation. Paper presented at the 21st ANZAM 2007 Conference, Sydney
(2009).
The struggle for equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction . In S. DemoulinJ. P. LeyensJ. F. DovidioEds., Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291–310). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
