Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000382

Abstract. Stereotypically, men are expected to outperform women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) domains, and women to outperform men in language. We conceptually replicated this association using reverse correlation tasks. Without available gender information, participants generated male images of physics teachers and female images of language teachers (Studies 1 and 3). Personal endorsement of respective ability stereotypes inconsistently predicted these effects (Studies 1 and 3). With unambiguous gender information (Study 2), participants generated feminized images of female language teachers and masculinized images of female physics teachers, whereas images of male teachers were unaffected by academic domain. Stereotype endorsement affected perceptions of female but not male teachers, suggesting that appearing feminine in STEM domains still signals professional mismatch.

References

  • Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Banchefsky, S., Westfall, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics, and Statistics Administration. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burns, M. D., Monteith, M. J., & Parker, L. R. (2017). Training away bias: The differential effects of counterstereotype training and self-regulation on stereotype activation and application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carrington, B. (2002). A quintessentially feminine domain? Student teachers’ constructions of primary teaching as a career. Educational Studies, 28, 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569022000003735 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3157–3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Degner, J., & Wentura, D. (2010). Automatic prejudice in childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017993 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dotsch, R. (2016). rcicr: Reverse correlation image classification toolbox. R package version 0.3.4.1. Retrieved from http://www.rondotsch.nl/rcicr/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dotsch, R., & Langner, O. (2011). RCIC_matlab. Retrieved from https://github.com/olilan/RCIC_matlab First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H., Langner, O., & van Knippenberg, A. (2008). Ethnic out-group faces are biased in the prejudiced mind. Psychological Science, 19, 978–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02186.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H., & van Knippenberg, A. D. (2013). Behavioral information biases the expected facial appearance of members of novel groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1928 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290534 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291173011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. van LangeA. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eckes, T., & Six-Materna, I. (1998). Leugnung von Diskriminierung: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des modernen Sexismus [Denial of discrimination: A scale measuring modern sexism]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 224–238. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiedler, K., & Bluemke, M. (2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2704_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. (in press). Six lessons for a cogent science of implicit bias and its criticism. Perspectives on Psychological Science. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In H. T. ReisC. M. JuddH. T. ReisC. M. JuddEds., Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Imhoff, R., & Dotsch, R. (2013). Do we look like me or like us? Visual projection as self- or ingroup-projection. Social Cognition, 31, 806–816. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.806 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Imhoff, R., Woelki, J., Hanke, S., & Dotsch, R. (2013). Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype content. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00386 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lakens, D., & Etz, A. J. (2017). Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and nonsignificant findings are probably true. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693058 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lane, K. A., Goh, J. X., & Driver-Linn, E. (2012). Implicit science stereotypes mediate the relationship between gender and academic participation. Sex Roles, 66, 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903485076 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “draw a scientist tests” among young children. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701250452 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2014). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mangini, M. C., & Biederman, I. (2004). Making the ineffable explicit: Estimating the information employed for face classifications. Cognitive Science, 28, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.11.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students: A pilot study. Science, 126, 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.126.3270.384 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of US Draw-A-Scientist studies. Child Development, 89, 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math= male, me= female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2011). Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences in math engagement and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1125–1156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410683 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulus, A., Rohr, M., Dotsch, R., & Wentura, D. (2016). Positive feeling, negative meaning: Visualizing the mental representations of in-group and out-group smiles. PLoS One, 11, e0151230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151230 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). Prejudice toward female leaders: Backlash effects and women’s impression management dilemma. Social and Personality Compass, 4, 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00306.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2009). Unraveling bias from student evaluations of their high school science teachers. Science Education, 93, 827–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20332 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinisch, B., Krell, M., Hergert, S., Gogolin, S., & Krüger, D. (2017). Methodical challenges concerning the Draw-A-Scientist Test: A critical view about the assessment and evaluation of learners’ conceptions of scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 1952–1975. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1362712 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2014). How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 4403–4408. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314788111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simpson, R. L. (1974). Sex stereotypes of secondary school teaching subjects: Male and female status gains and losses. Sociology of Education, 47, 388–398. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111912 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smyth, F. L., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). On the gender-science stereotypes held by scientists: Explicit accord with gender-ratios, implicit accord with scientific identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2006). Studierende an Hochschulen [Students at Universities]. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.1, WS 2006/2007. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2016). Studierende an Hochschulen [Students at Universities]. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.1, WS 2016/2017. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steinke, J. (2012). Portrayals of female scientists in the mass media. In A. ValdiviaS. R. MazzarellaEds., The international encyclopedia of media studies (pp. 1–18). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems070 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, M. D., Henley, T. B., & Snell, C. M. (2006). The Draw a Scientist Test: A different population and a somewhat different story. College Student Journal, 40, 140–148. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weeber, S., & Hobler, D. (2015). Lehramtstudent_innen nach Studiengängen und Fächern im Wintersemester 2013/14 in Deutschland. Auswertung für das GEW-Zukunftsforum Lehrer_innenbildung [Numbers of students in teacher's training sorted by university course and discipline in winter semester 2013/14 in Germany]. GEW: Eigenverlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Westfall, J., Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Replicating studies in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614564879 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In J. M. OlsonM. P. ZannaEds., Advances in experimental social psychology (46, pp. 55–123). London, UK: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wolter, I., Glüer, M., & Hannover, B. (2014). Gender-typicality of activity offerings and child-teacher relationship closeness in German “Kindergarten”. Influences on the development of spelling competence as an indicator of early basic literacy in boys and girls. Learning and Individual Differences, 31, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zander, L., Wolter, I., Latsch, M., & Hannover, B. (2015). Qualified for teaching physics? How prospective teachers perceive teachers with a migration background – and how it’s really about “him” or “her”. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7, 255–279. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar