Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Report

Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing

A Survey Among Members of the German Psychological Society

Published Online:July 01, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384

Abstract

Abstract. Central values of science are, among others, transparency, verifiability, replicability, and openness. The currently very prominent Open Science (OS) movement supports these values. Among its most important principles are open methodology (comprehensive and useful documentation of methods and materials used), open access to published research output, and open data (making collected data available for re-analyses). We here present a survey conducted among members of the German Psychological Society (N = 337), in which we applied a mixed-methods approach (quantitative and qualitative data) to assess attitudes toward OS in general and toward data sharing more specifically. Attitudes toward OS were distinguished into positive expectations (“hopes”) and negative expectations (“fears”). These were un-correlated. There were generally more hopes associated with OS and data sharing than fears. Both hopes and fears were highest among early career researchers and lowest among professors. The analysis of the open answers revealed that generally positive attitudes toward data sharing (especially sharing of data related to a published article) are somewhat diminished by cost/benefit considerations. The results are discussed with respect to individual researchers’ behavior and with respect to structural changes in the research system.

References

  • Abele-Brehm, A., & Bühner, M. (2016). Wer soll die Professur bekommen? Eine Untersuchung zur Bewertung von Auswahlkriterien in Berufungsverfahren der Psychologie [Who should receive the professorship? A survey on the evaluation of selection criteria in professorship appointments in psychology]. Psychologische Rundschau, 67, 1–12. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Abele-Brehm, A., Gollwitzer, M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2018, April 4). Umfrage zu den DGPs-Datenmanagementempfehlungen [Survey] [Survey on data management recommendations of the German Psychological Society]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212261 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, H., Micheli-Campbell, M., & Udyawer, V. (2019). Early career researchers embrace data sharing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 34, 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Farnham, A., Kurz, C., Öztürk, M. A., Solbiati, M., Myllyntaus, O., Meekes, J., … Hettne, K. (2017). Early career researchers want Open Science. Genome Biology, 18, 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1351-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fecher, B., & Wagner, G. G. (2016). A research symbiont. Science, 351, 1405–1406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.351.6280.1405-b First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 45–52. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, M., Schönbrodt, F. D., Steinberg, U., & Abele-Brehm, A. (2018). Die Datenmanagement-Empfehlungen der DGPs: Ein Zwischenstand [The data management recommendations of the DGPs: An intermediate report]. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000415 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Houtkoop, B., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D., Nichols, T., & Wagenmakers, E. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices of Psychological Sciences, 1, 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levitt, H., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J., Frost, D., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APAPublications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist, 73, 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Longo, D. L., & Drazen, J. M. (2016). Data sharing. New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 276–277. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1516564 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., … Yarkoni, T. (2016). Point of View: How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5, e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2015). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R package version 0.9.12-2. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Noy, N. (2018, September 5). Making it easier to discover datasets. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.blog.google/products/search/making-it-easier-discover-datasets/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Renkewitz, F., & Heene, M. (2018). The replication crisis and open science in psychology – progress and yet unsolved problems. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226, 204–205. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000339 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Resnik, D. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D., Gollwitzer, M., & Abele-Brehm, A. (2017). Der Umgang mit Forschungsdaten im Fach Psychologie: Konkretisierung der DFG-Leitlinien [How to deal with research data in psychology: Specification of guidelines of the German Research Foundation]. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000341 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D., Maier, M., Heene, M., & Bühner, M. (2018). Forschungstransparenz als hohes wissenschaftliches Gut stärken: Konkrete Ansatzmöglichkeiten für Psychologische Institute [Fostering research transparency as a key property of science: Concrete actions for psychological departments]. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000386 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steinberg, U., Abele-Brehm, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2018). Attitudes towards DGPs data management recommendations and public data sharing. PsychArchives. [Data files and code book; in German]. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.856 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stürmer, S., Oeberst, A., Trötschel, R., & Decker, O. (2017). Early-Career Researchers’ perceptions of the prevalence of questionable research practices, potential causes, and Open Science. Social Psychology, 48, 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000324 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wundt, W. (1896). Grundriß der Psychologie [Fundamentals of psychology]. Leipzig, Germany: W. Engelmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar