Sample Size Calculations for Testing Equivalence of Two Exponential Distributions With Right Censoring
Allocation With Costs
Abstract
Abstract. The present study considered two independent exponential distributions with the hypothesis for testing equivalence of lifetime means or failure rates, and aimed to determine the required uncensored sample size based on power, sampling cost, and censoring proportion simultaneously in the case of right censoring. Approximate sample size formulas with an iterative procedure were proposed and an uncensored sample size allocation ratio was derived to minimize the total cost for a designated power or maximize statistical power for a limit cost. R codes are provided for easy application. The proposed methods are validated in terms of Type I errors and statistical power in a simulation study, and are recommended for the future use.
References
(2010). Dynamics of sleep-wake cyclicity at night across the human lifespan. Frontiers in Neurology, 1, 156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00554
(1963). The sampling distribution of an estimate arising in life testing. Technometrics, 5, 361–374.
(1989). Effect of unequal censoring on the size and power of the logrank and Wilcoxon types of tests for survival data. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 937–945.
(1996). Bioequivalence trials, intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets. Statistical Science, 11, 283–319.
(1990). Comparison of two exponential distributions. Biometrical Journal, 3, 267–276.
(2008). Sample size calculations in clinical research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
(1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
(1994). Modelling Survival data in medical research. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
(1993). How to establish equivalence when data are censored: A randomized trial of treatments for B non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Statistics in Medicine, 12, 1353–1364.
(2007). Introduction to statistical methods for clinical trials. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
(1984). Analysis of survival data. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
(2004). Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1–10.
(1990). Sample size methodology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1974). Planning the size and duration of a clinical trial studying the time to some critical event. Journal of Chronic Disease, 27, 15–24.
(2011). Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 64, 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X512408
(2009). Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711007X267289
(1970). Distributions in statistics: Continuous univariate distributions-2. New York, NY: Wiley.
(2010). Sample sizes for clinical trials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
(1981). A Monte Carlo study of some two-sample rank tests with censored data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 713–719.
(1982). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. New York, NY: Wiley.
(1992). Sample size determination for the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 20, 101–104.
(2002). Dynamics of sleep-wake transitions during sleep. Europhysics Letters, 57, 625–631.
(1974). Sample-size determination. Huntington, NY: Robert Krieger.
(1997). Sample size tables for clinical studies (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
(2006). Survival analysis: A practical approach (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2005). Equivalence of two treatments and sample size determination under exponential survival model with censoring. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49, 217–226.
(2011). What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020747
(1991). High survival rate in advanced stage B-cell (Burkitt and Sig+) lymphomas and leukemias without CNS involvement with a short intensive poly-chemotherapy. Results of a randomized trial for 216 children from the French Pediatric Oncology Society. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 9, 123–132.
(2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org
(1992). Type I error and the number of iterations in Monte Carlo studies of robustness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 283–288.
(1993). Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 553–565.
(1999). Sample size formula with a continuous outcome for unequal group sizes and unequal variances. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 87–91.
(1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680.
(2000). Testing for robustness in Monte Carlo studies. Psychological Methods, 5, 230–240.
(2000). Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 293–315.
(1954). A simple presentation of optimum sampling results. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series, B16, 239–241.
(2001). Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical test. Psychological Methods, 6, 371–386.
(2009). Evaluating independent proportions for statistical difference, equivalence, indeterminacy, and trivial difference using inferential confidence intervals. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 171–189.
(2014). Evaluating clinical significance: Incorporating robust statistics with normative comparison tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12015
(2012). Testing equivalence in communication research: Theory and application. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 190–213.
(1993). A log-rank test for equivalence of two survivor functions. Biometrics, 49, 877–881.
(2010). Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
(2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58, 475–482.
