Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Article

Increased Motor Cortex Excitability for Concealed Visual Information

Published Online:November 08, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000230

Abstract

Abstract. Deceptive behavior involves complex neural processes involving the primary motor cortex. The dynamics of this motor cortex excitability prior to lying are still not well understood. We sought to examine whether corticospinal excitability can be used to suggest the presence of deliberately concealed information in a modified version of the guilty knowledge test (GKT). Participants pressed keys to either truthfully or deceitfully indicate their familiarity with a series of faces. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded during response preparation to measure muscle-specific neural excitability. We hypothesized that MEPs would increase during the deceptive condition not only in the lie-telling finger but also in the suppressed truth-telling finger. We report a group-level increase in overall corticospinal excitability 300 ms following stimulus onset during the deceptive condition, without specific activation of the neural representation of the truth-telling finger. We discuss cognitive processes, particularly response conflict and/or automated responses to familiar stimuli, which may drive the observed nonspecific increase of motor excitability in deception.

References

  • Abe, N., Suzuki, M., Mori, E., Itoh, M. & Fujii, T. (2007). Deceiving others: Distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.287 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ben-Shakhar, G. & Dolev, K. (1996). Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: Effects of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.273 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ben-Shakhar, G. & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bestmann, S., Harrison, L. M., Blankenburg, F., Mars, R. B., Haggard, P., Friston, K. J. & Rothwell, J. C. (2008). Excitability during Preparation for Action. Current Biology, 18, 775–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bond, C. F. & Robinson, M. (1988). The evolution of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 12, 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00987597 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buckholtz, J. W. & Faigman, D. L. (2014). Promises, promises for neuroscience and law. Current Biology, 24(18), R861–R867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.057 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231–243. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Day, B. L., Rothwell, J. C., Thompson, P. D., Maertens De Noordhout, A., Nakashima, K., Shannon, K. & Marsden, C. D. (1989). Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain. Brain, 112(Pt 3), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/112.3.649 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., Karis, D. & Donchin, E. (1987). Definition, identification, and reliability of measurement of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential. Advances in Psychophysiology, 2(S1), 78. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Farah, M. J., Hutchinson, J. B., Phelps, E. A. & Wagner, A. D. (2014). Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3665 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Farwell, L. & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531–547. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gandevia, S. C. & Rothwell, J. C. (1987). Knowledge of motor commands and the recruitment of human motoneurons. Brain, 110, 1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/110.5.1117 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ganis, G. & Schendan, H. E. (2012). Concealed semantic and episodic autobiographical memory electrified. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00354 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hadar, A. A., Makris, S. & Yarrow, K. (2012a). The truth-telling motor cortex: Response competition in M1 discloses deceptive behaviour. Biological Psychology, 89, 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.019 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hadar, A. A., Makris, S. & Yarrow, K. (2012b). Single-pulse TMS related syncopal spell in a healthy subject. Brain Stimulation, 5, 652–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.08.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hadar, A. A., Rowe, P., Di Costa, S., Jones, A. & Yarrow, K. (2016). Motor-evoked potentials reveal a motor-cortical readout of evidence accumulation for sensorimotor decisions. Psychophysiology, 53, 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12737 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hancock, P. (2004). Hancock, P., Psychological Image Collection at Stirling. University of Stirling Psychology Department 2000. Retrieved from http://pics.stir.ac.uk/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Herron, J. E. & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903322370762 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Keel, J. C., Smith, M. J. & Wassermann, E. M. (2001). A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 720. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kelly, K. J., Murray, E., Barrios, V., Gorman, J., Ganis, G. & Keenan, J. P. (2009). The effect of deception on motor cortex excitability. Social Neuroscience, 4, 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910802424445 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kiers, L., Fernando, B. & Tomkins, D. (1997). Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on magnetic motor-evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control, 105, 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-884x(97)88242-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Langleben, D. D., Loughead, J. W., Bilker, W. B., Ruparel, K., Childress, A. R., Busch, S. I. & Gur, R. C. (2005). Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20191 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Langleben, D. D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J. A., Gur, R. C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J. D., … Childress, A. R. (2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study. NeuroImage, 15, 727–732. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lo, Y. L., Fook-Chong, S. & Tan, E. K. (2003). Increased cortical excitability in human deception. Neuroreport, 14, 1021–1024. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000070829.57864.e4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046060 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mameli, F., Mrakic-Sposta, S., Vergari, M., Fumagalli, M., Macis, M., Ferrucci, R., … Priori, A. (2010). Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general–but not personal–knowledge deception: multiple brain networks for lying. Behavioural Brain Research, 211, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meijer, E. H., Verschuere, B., Gamer, M., Merckelbach, H. & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2016). Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty. Psychophysiology, 53, 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/PSYP.12609 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pascual-Leone, A., Valls-Solé, J., Wassermann, E. M., Brasil-Neto, J., Cohen, L. G. & Hallett, M. (1992). Effects of focal transcranial magnetic stimulation on simple reaction time to acoustic, visual and somatosensory stimuli. Brain, 115(Pt 4), 1045–1059. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/115.4.1045 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Priori, A., Mameli, F., Cogiamanian, F., Marceglia, S., Tiriticco, M., Mrakic-Sposta, S., … Sartori, G. (2008). Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 451. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm088 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosburg, T. & Mecklinger, A. (2017). The costs of target prioritization and the external requirements for using a recall-to-reject strategy in memory exclusion tasks: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1844–1855. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1256-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., Cantwell, B., Nasman, V. T., Wojdac, V., Ivanov, S. & Mazzeri, L. (1988). A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. International Journal of Neuroscience, 42, 157–161. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207458808985770 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenfeld, J. P. & Labkovsky, E. (2010). New P300-based protocol to detect concealed information: resistance to mental countermeasures against only half the irrelevant stimuli and a possible ERP indicator of countermeasures. Psychophysiology, 47, 1002–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01024.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L. & Schwarb, H. (2010). Brain activation evidence for response conflict in the exclude recognition task. Brain Research, 1329, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seymour, T. L. & Kerlin, J. R. (2008). Successful detection of verbal and visual concealed knowledge using an RT-based paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1375 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seymour, T. L. & Schumacher, E. H. (2009). Electromyographic evidence for response conflict in the exclude recognition task. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.71 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spieser, L., Kohl, C., Forster, B., Bestmann, S. & Yarrow, K. (2018). Neurodynamic evidence supports a forced-excursion model of decision-making under speed/accuracy instructions. eNeuro. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0159-18.2018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spence, S. A. (2004). The deceptive brain. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680409700133 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spence, S. A, Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J. & Ganesan, V. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tandonnet, C., Garry, M. I. & Summers, J. J. (2011). Selective suppression of the incorrect response implementation in choice behavior assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Psychophysiology, 48, 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01121.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verschuere, B., Rosenfeld, J. P., Winograd, M. R., Labkovsky, E. & Wiersema, R. (2009). The role of deception in P300 memory detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X384184 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verschuere, B., Spruyt, A., Meijer, E. H. & Otgaar, H. (2011). The ease of lying. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 908–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 855–857. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vrij, A., Mann, S. A., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R. & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S. & Fisher, R. P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9066-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ziemann, U., Tergau, F., Netz, J. & Hömberg, V. (1997). Delay in simple reaction time after focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain occurs at the final motor output stage. Brain Research, 744, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(96)01062-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar