Skip to main content
Article

Phonological P2 or PMN During Spoken Word Recognition in Mandarin Chinese

Prime Modality Matters

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000238

Abstract. Word-initial phonological mismatches during spoken word recognition often elicit an event-related potential (ERP) component, namely, the phonological mapping negativity (PMN) in cross-modal priming studies or studies using sentence as context. However, recent studies also reported that a phonological P2 but not PMN has been observed for Mandarin Chinese spoken word recognition in unimodal word-matching and meaning-matching experiments, that is, both the prime and target words were presented auditorily. In the present study, the same pairs of disyllabic Mandarin Chinese words as in the prior unimodal studies were used as stimuli to investigate whether or not the phonological P2 effect is modulated by prime modality and can be replicated in a cross-modal design (i.e., written primes followed by spoken targets). Both the phonological and semantic relations between primes and targets were manipulated. Participants were instructed to judge whether the meaning of the two words were same or not. An enhanced PMN between 250 and 320 ms was elicited by word-initial phonological mismatches. In the later time window, centro-parietally distributed early N400 and late N400 were elicited in semantically unrelated conditions. The presence of PMN instead of P2 in the current study implies that ERP markers of word-initial phonological mismatches during spoken word recognition are modulated by the modality of primes at the level of phonological analysis.

References

  • Archibald, L. M., & Joanisse, M. F. (2011). Electrophysiological responses to coarticulatory and word level miscues. Journal Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1275–1291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023506 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748408402157 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cai, Q, & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Subtlex-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5, e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chereau, C., Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2007). Reading spoken words: Orthographic effects in auditory priming. Cognition, 102, 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Connolly, J. F., Byrne, J. M., & Dywan, C. A. (1995). Assessing adult receptive vocabulary with event-related potentials: An investigation of cross-modal and cross-form priming. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639508405145 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Connolly, J. F., & Phillips, N. A. (1994). Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.3.256 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Connolly, J. F., Phillips, N. A., & Forbes, K. A. (1995). The effects of phonological and semantic features of sentence-ending words on visual event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(95)98479-R First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Connolly, J. F., Service, E., D’Arcy, R. C. N., Kujala, A., & Alho, K. (2001). Phonological aspects of word recognition as revealed by high-resolution spatio-temporal brain mapping. Neuroreport, 12(2), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200102120-00012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Démonet, J. F., Thierry, G., & Cardebat, D. (2005). Renewal of the neurophysiology of language: Functional neuroimaging. Physiological Reviews, 85, 49–95. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00049.2003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Desroches, A. S., Newman, R. L., & Joanisse, M. F. (2009). Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: Electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1893–1906. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21142 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dumay, N., Benraïss, A., Barriol, B., Colin, C., Radeau, M., & Besson, M. (2001). Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892901564117 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frauenfelder, U. H., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction. Cognition, 25, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90002-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2002). Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 220–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00003-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289823 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews, 8, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holcomb, P. J. (1988). Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming. Brain and Language, 35, 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(88)90101-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, X., & Yang, J. C. (2016). The time course of lexical competition during spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 27, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000492 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, X., Yang, J. C., Chang, R., & Guo, C. (2016). Task modulation of disyllabic spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese: A unimodal ERP study. Scientific Reports, 6, 25916. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25916 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, X., Yang, J. C., Zhang, Q., & Guo, C. (2014). The time course of spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese: A unimodal ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 63, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.015 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacquemot, C., & Scott, S. K. (2006). What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jusezyk, P. W., & Luce, P. A. (2002). Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Past and present. Ear Hear, 23, 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200202000-00002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K.D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, Y., Shu, H., & Wei, J. (2006). Spoken word recognition in context: Evidence from Chinese ERP analyses. Brain and Language, 96, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.08.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malins, J. G., & Joanisse, M. F. (2012). Setting the tone: An ERP investigation of the influences of phonological similarity on spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2032–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malins, J. G., Gao, D., Tao, R., Booth, J. R., Shu, H., Joanisse, M. F., … Desroches, A. S. (2014). Developmental differences in the influence of phonological similarity on spoken word processing in mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language, 138, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mattys, S. L. (1997). The use of time during lexical processing and segmentation: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 310–329. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210789 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2001). Spoken word access processes: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960143000209 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Newman, R. L., & Connolly, J. F. (2009). Electrophysiological markers of pre-lexical speech processing: Evidence for bottom–up and top–down effects on spoken word processing. Biological Psychology, 80, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perre, L., Midgley, K., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). When beef primes reef more than leaf: Orthographic information affects phonological priming in spoken word recognition. Psychophysiology, 46, 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00813.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. (1994). Neurophysiological manifestations of phonological processing: Latency variation of a negative ERP component timelocked to phonological mismatch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.3.204 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage, 62, 816–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosch, E, Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rugg, M. D. (1984). Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words. Neuropsychologia, 22, 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(84)90038-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 394–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.394 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ventura, P., Morais, J., Pattamadilok, C., & Kolinsky, R. (2004). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 57–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960601049628 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar