Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Article

An Analysis of N2 Event-Related-Potential Correlates of Sequential and Response-Facilitation Effects in Cognitive Control

Published Online:March 09, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000212

Abstract

Abstract. According to conflict-monitoring theory (Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001), sequential adjustments in cognitive control indicate that encountering information-processing conflict engages cognitive-control mechanisms. With 20 participants in an event-related-potential (ERP) experiment, we found significant congruence-sequence effects (CSEs) for behavioral measures and for N2 amplitude, a negative-going ERP component established in previous work to be related to cognitive control. We also found an interaction between the Stroop-trajectory manipulation and a response-compatibility manipulation for behavioral measures and, to a lesser extent, for N2 amplitude, such that the Stroop-trajectory congruence effect was larger on response-compatible than on response-incompatible trials. This study is the first to identify N2 amplitude as a neural correlate of the CSE in a confound-minimized task. Accordingly, these results found N2 amplitude to be associated with adjustments in cognitive control as a function of sequential and response-facilitation effects while also validating the Stroop-trajectory task as a confound-minimized means of assessing neural correlates of CSEs.

References

  • Azizian, A., Freitas, A. L., Parvaz, M. A. & Squires, N. K. (2006). Beware misleading cues: Perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. Psychophysiology, 43, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00409.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bruin, K. J. & Wijers, A. A. (2002). Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: A comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bugg, J. M. (2008). Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1217–1227. https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.7.1217 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carter, C. S. & van Veen, V. (2007). Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.367 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clayson, P. E. & Larson, M. J. (2011a). Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: Support for the conflict monitoring theory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1953–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clayson, P. E. & Larson, M. J. (2011b). Effects of repetition priming on electrophysiological and behavioral indices of conflict adaptation and cognitive control. Psychophysiology, 48, 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01265.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Jong, R., Liang, C. C. & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Delorme, A. & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Donkers, F. C. & van Boxtel, G. J. (2004). The N2 in go/NoGo tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 56, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S. & Notebaert, W. (2014). Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay. Psychological Research, 78, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0498-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feldman, J. L., Clark, S. L. & Freitas, A. L. (2015). Conflict adaptation within but not across NoGo decision criteria: Event-related-potential evidence of specificity in the contextual modulation of cognitive control. Biological Psychology, 109, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.05.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feldman, J. L. & Freitas, A. L. (2016). An investigation of the reliability and self-regulatory correlates of conflict adaptation. Experimental Psychology, 63, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000328 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Folstein, J. R. & van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Freitas, A. L., Banai, R. & Clark, S. L. (2009). When cognitive control is calibrated: Event-related potential correlates of adapting to information-processing conflict despite erroneous response preparation. Psychophysiology, 46, 1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00864.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Freitas, A. L. & Clark, S. L. (2015). Generality and specificity in cognitive control: Conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks. Psychological Research, 79, 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0540-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenhouse, S. W. & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289823 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439302 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756773 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hughes, G., Velmans, M. & De Fockert, J. (2009). Unconscious priming of a no-go response. Psychophysiology, 46, 1258–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00873.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jodo, E. & Kayama, Y. (1992). Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-L First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kopp, B., Mattler, U., Goertz, R. & Rist, F. (1996). N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-884X(96)95617-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A. & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.688 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Larson, M. J. & Clayson, P. E. (2011). The relationship between cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of performance monitoring. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-010-0018-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Larson, M. J., Clayson, P. E. & Clawson, A. (2014). Making sense of all the conflict: A theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 93, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Larson, M. J., Clayson, P. E., Kirwan, C. B. & Weissman, D. H. (2016). Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds. Psychophysiology, 53, 814–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12625 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mayr, U., Awh, E. & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M. & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.993 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W. & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/NoGo task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.1.17 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rey-Mermet, A. & Gade, M. (2016). Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1505–1532. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000229 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rustamov, N., Rodriguez-Raecke, R., Timm, L., Agrawal, D., Dressler, D., Schrader, C., … Kopp, B. (2013). Absence of congruency sequence effects reveals neurocognitive inflexibility in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2976–2987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, J. R. & De Houwer, J. (2011). Now you see it, now you don’t: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychologica, 138, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, J. R. & Weissman, D. H. (2014). Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds. PLoS One, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102337 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simon, J. R., Paullin, C., Overmyer, S. P. & Berbaum, K. (1985). Reaction time to word meaning and ink color of laterally-presented Stroop stimuli: Effects of handedness and sex. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207458509070816 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spapé, M. M. & Hommel, B. (2014). Sequential modulations of the Simon effect depend on episodic retrieval. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00855 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748508400920 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Treccani, B., Cubelli, R., Sala, S. D. & Umiltà, C. (2009). Flanker and Simon effects interact at the response selection stage. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1784–1804. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802557751 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wang, C., Ulbert, I., Schomer, D. L., Marinkovic, K. & Halgren, E. (2005). Responses of human anterior cingulate cortex microdomains to error detection, conflict monitoring, stimulus-response mapping, familiarity, and orienting. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4151-04.2005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J. & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 2022–2037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037454 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H. & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 644–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.644 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M. & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 931–959. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar