Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Research Note

The Relationship Between Leader–Member Exchange and Employees’ Proactive Behaviors

The Moderating Role of Leader’s Linking-Pin Position

Published Online:July 15, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000226

Abstract

Abstract. The present study proposed that, unlike prior leader–member exchange (LMX) research which often implicitly assumed that each leader develops equal-quality relationships with their supervisors (leader’s LMX; LLX), every leader develops different relationships with their supervisors and, in turn, receive different amounts of resources. Moreover, these differentiated relationships with superiors will influence how leader–member relationship quality affects team members’ voice and creativity. We adopted a multi-temporal (three wave) and multi-source (leaders and employees) research design. Hypotheses were tested on a sample of 227 bank employees working in 52 departments. Results of the hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analysis showed that LLX moderates the relationship between LMX and team members’ voice behavior and creative performance. Strengths, limitations, practical implications, and directions for future research are discussed.

References

  • Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. In J. GreenbergM. EdwardsEds., Voice and silence in organizations (pp. 175–202). Bingley, UK: Emerald. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire (2nd ed.). Redwood, CA: Mind Garden. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carnevale, J. B., Huang, L., Crede, M., Harms, P., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2017). Leading to stimulate employee’s ideas: A quantitative review of leader-member exchange, employee voice, creativity, and innovative. Applied Psychology, 66, 517–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/spps.12102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cashman, J., Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1976). Organizational understructure and leadership: A longitudinal investigation of the managerial role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90042-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 618–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040653 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In M. D. DunnetteEd., Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201–1245). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graen, G., Cashman, J. F., Ginsburg, S., & Schiemann, W. (1977). Effects of linking-pin quality on the quality of working life of lower participants. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 491–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392185 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herdman, A. O., Yang, J., & Arthur, J. B. (2017). How does leader-member exchange disparity affect teamwork behavior and effectiveness in work groups? The moderating role of leader-leader exchange. Journal of Management, 43, 1498–1523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314556315 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jiang, J. Y., Law, K. S., & Sun, J. J. M. (2014). Leader-member relationship and burnout: The moderating role of leader integrity. Management and Organization Review, 10, 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12022 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In G. R. FerrisEd., Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 15, pp. 47–119). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Venkataramani, V., Green, S. G., & Schleicher, D. J. (2010). Well-connected leaders: The impact of leaders’ social network ties on LMX and members’ work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1071–1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020214 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhou, L., Wang, M., Chen, G., & Shi, J. (2012). Supervisors’ upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: Testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026305 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar