Abstract
Abstract. This study contributes to the literature on work engagement and job demands-resources (JD-R) theory by exploring the momentary relations between episodic demands, resources, engagement, and performance during various activities (e.g., checking e-mails) within a day. Using experience-sampling methodology, 61 Dutch employees completed activity characteristics, engagement, and performance surveys at three different times during the day for one week. Results from 413 observations showed that 88% of the total variance in engagement fluctuates from activity to activity. Multilevel path analysis results confirmed that during activities, episodic engagement was positively related to performance, and mediated the positive associations of resources and negative associations of hindering demands with performance.
References
2014). Daily fluctuations in work engagement: An overview and current directions. European Psychologist, 19, 227–236. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000160
(2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189–206. doi: 10.1348/096317909X402596
(2014).
(Job demands – resources theory . In C. CooperP. ChenEds., Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 37–64). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.2011).
(Subjective well-being in organizations . In K. S. CameronG. M. SpreitzerEds., Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 178–189). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1054–1068. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1054
(1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 228–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
(2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848. doi: 10.1037/a0019364
(2013). Problem solving and well-being: Exploring the instrumental role of job control and social support. Journal of Management, 39, 1016–1043. doi: 10.1177/0149206311430262
(2004). Linking work conditions to unpleasant affect: Cognition, categorization and goals. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 343–363. doi: 10.1348/0963179041752628
(2004). A within-person examination of correlates of performance and emotions while working. Human Performance, 17, 145–168. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1702_2
(1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(2005). How dentists cope with their job demands and stay engaged: The moderating role of job resources. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113, 479–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00250.x
(2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 78–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003
(2010).
(A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences . In A. B. BakkerM. P. LeiterEds., Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). New York, NY: Psychology Press.2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2015). The window of my eyes: Task disengagement and mental fatigue covary with pupil dynamics. Biological Psychology, 110, 100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.06.013
(2010). Psychological and physiological reactions to high workloads: Implications for well-being. Personnel Psychology, 63, 407–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01175.x
(1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724. doi: 10.2307/256287
(1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York, NY: Wiley.
(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
(2012). Resources and time pressure as day-Ievel antecedents of work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 181–198. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02022.x
(2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92. doi: 10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
(2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79–93. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
(2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525–556. doi: 10.3102/00346543074004525
(2006). Probing interactions in multiple linear regression, latent curve analysis, and hierarchical linear modeling: Interactive calculation tools for establishing simple intercepts, simple slopes, and regions of significance [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/
(2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1438–1451. doi: 10.1037/a0016752
(2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315. doi: 10.1002/job.248
(2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471
(2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software] Available from http://quantpsy.org/
(2010). Daily fluctuations in teachers’ well-being: A diary study using the Job Demands-Resources model. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 23, 563–584. doi: 10.1080/10615801003728273
(1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi: 10, 1207/s1532790mbr2502_4
(2005). Finding our way: An introduction to path analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 115–122. doi: 10.1177/070674370505000207
(2014). How challenging was your work today? A diary study on challenge and hindrance job demands and work-related well-being. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrica, 38, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/BF02291170
(2011). Het taakkenmerken model. Een update en empirische toets van het hernieuwde model
([The job characteristics model. An update and empirical test of the renewed model] . Over.Werk. Tijdschrift van Het Steunpunt WSE, 21, 69–74.2013).
(State work engagement: The significance of within-person fluctuations . In A. B. BakkerK. DanielsEds., A day in the life of a happy worker (pp. 25–40). Abingdon, UK: Psychology Press.2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
(