Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

At the Intersection of Motivational Relevance and Website Visual Complexity

New Evidence for Memory Narrowing and Broadening Effects

Published Online:December 19, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000267

Abstract

Abstract. This study investigated how resource allocation to and encoding of irrelevant peripheral information (advertisements) varied as a function of the emotional tone of a central event (movie clip) and website complexity (number of advertisements). Secondary task reaction times (STRTs) and ad recognition accuracy were used to test the predictions. Two competing hypotheses – a memory narrowing hypothesis and an escape hypothesis – were posed to explain encoding of advertisements paired with negative arousing movie clips at the highest level of website complexity. The results were more supportive of the memory narrowing hypothesis; participants had more resources while viewing positive rather than negative movies and advertisements were encoded better when they were presented with positive rather than negative movie clips. However, for calm movie clips this difference showed at the lowest level of website complexity, but gradually diminished as the level of complexity increased.

References

  • Bakalash, T., & Riemer, H. (2013). Exploring ad-elicited emotional arousal and memory for the ad using fMRI. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.768065 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Belanche, D., Flavián, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2017). Understanding interactive online advertising: Congruence and product involvement in highly and lowly arousing, skippable video ads. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.06.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brewer, W. (1986). What is autobiographical memory? In D. C. RubinEd., Autobiographical memory (pp. 25–49). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.191 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Christianson, S., & Loftus, E. F. (1991). Remembering emotional events: The fate of detailed information. Cognition and Emotion, 5(2), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411027 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(3), 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.364 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Daugherty, T., Hoffman, E., Kennedy, K., & Nolan, M. (2018). Measuring consumer neural activation to differentiate cognitive processing of advertising: Revisiting Krugman. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1/2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2017-0657 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diao, F., & Sundar, S. S. (2004). Orienting response and memory for web advertisements: Exploring effects of pop-up window and animation. Communication Research, 31(5), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204267932 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fox, J., Park, B., & Lang, A. (2007). When available resources become negative resources: The effects of cognitive overload on memory sensitivity and criterion bias. Communication Research, 34, 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207300429 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heuer, F., & Reisberg, D. (1992). Emotion, arousal, and memory for detail. In S. ChristiansonEd., The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 151–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kebeck, G., & Lohaus, A. (1986). Effect of emotional arousal on free recall of complex material. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63(2, Pt 1), 461–462. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1986.63.2.461 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Macmillan, N., & Creelman, C. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, A. (2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In R. NabiM. B. OliverEds., The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 193–204). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A., & Basil, M. D. (1998). Attention, resource allocation, and communication research: What do secondary task reaction times measure anyway? In M. RoloffEd., Communication yearbook, 21 (pp. 443–474). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A., Bradley, S. D., Park, B., Shin, M., & Chung, Y. (2006). Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology, 8(4), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0804_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, A., Kurita, S., Gao, Y., & Rubenking, B. (2013). Measuring television message complexity as available processing resources: Dimensions of information and cognitive load. Media Psychology, 16(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.764707 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, A., Park, B., Sanders-Jackson, A. N., Wilson, B. D., & Wang, Z. (2007). Cognition and emotion in TV message processing: How valence, arousing content, structural complexity, and information density affect the availability of cognitive resources. Media Psychology, 10(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701532880 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, A., Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (1999). Something for nothing: Is visual encoding automatic? Media Psychology, 1(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0102_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, A., Sanders-Jackson, A., Wang, Z., & Rubenking, B. (2013). Motivated message processing: How motivational activation influences resource allocation, encoding, and storage of TV messages. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9329-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, A., & Yegiyan, N. S. (2009). Motivated message processing: How media elicit motivation which influences how media are processed. In J. McCroskeyK. FloydM. BeattyEds., Biological dimensions of communication (pp. 135–159). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.377 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, P. J., Gilmore, R., Cuthbert, B. N., & Bradley, M. M. (1996, October). Inside picture processing: Emotional modulation of ERPs from the cortical surface. Paper presented to the meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Toronto, Canada. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, S., & Lang, A. (2015). Redefining media content and structure in terms of available resources: Toward a dynamic human-centric theory of communication. Communication Research, 42(5), 599–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213488416 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Libkuman, T. M., Stabler, C. L., & Otani, H. (2004). Arousal, valence, and memory for detail. memory, 12(2), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000630 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Loftus, E. F., & Burns, T. E. (1982). Mental shock can produce retrograde amnesia. Memory & Cognition, 10(4), 318–323. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202423 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Neisser, U. (1986). Remembering Pearl Harbor: Reply to Thompson and Cowan. Cognition, 23(3), 285–286. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2010). Message processing. In C. R. BergerM. E. RoloffD. R. Roskos-EwoldsenEds., The handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 129–145). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sundar, S. S., & Kalyanaraman, S. (2004). Arousal, memory, and impression-formation effects of animation speed in web advertising. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639152 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S. (2012). Gun focus effect revisited: Emotional tone modulates information processing strategy. Communication Research, 39(6), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211400900 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S. (2014). Conceptualizing visual detail: Message structure as a predictor of preferential processing. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.873779 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S. (2015a). Explicating the emotion spillover effect: At the intersection of motivational activation, resource allocation, and consolidation. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 27(3), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000164 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S. (2015b). Gun focus effect revisited II: How sex modulates emotional information processing strategy. Communication Research, 42(7), 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213490192 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S., & Lang, A. (2010). Processing central and peripheral detail: How content arousal and emotional tone influence encoding. Media Psychology, 13(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903563014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2011). Encoding details: Positive emotion leads to memory broadening. Cognition & Emotion, 25(7), 1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.540821 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar