Abstract
Abstract. What makes people show emotional responses toward victims of social injustice in news stories? What are the behavioral consequences of these emotions? Using an online experiment, this study examined the effects of abnormality perception on how people make cognitive and affective assessments of a negative social event. We found that content abnormality (i.e., an unusual/unexpected event) perceived in news stories leads people to attribute less responsibility to the victim and experience stronger emotional responses (i.e., anger and sadness). This in turn increases the desire for a stronger punishment toward the perpetrator. Syntactic abnormality (i.e., negation) indirectly influenced punitive judgment by increasing the responsibility attributed to the offender. The use of negation as the dominant sentence structure (syntactic abnormality) reduced prosocial intentions, but only when the news story was depicted as an abnormal occurrence (content abnormality). These findings illuminate the interconnections between abnormality perception, emotion, and judgment.
References
(2004). Twice hurt: How newspaper coverage may reduce empathy and engender blame for female victims of crime. Sex Roles, 51(9–10), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5463-7
(1979). Effects of controllable versus uncontrollable factors on responsibility attributions: A single-subject approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.110
(1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. The Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800105
(1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240104
(1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
(1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1950). Abnormal psychology and modern life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
(1996). Role of imagery in recall of deviant news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300404
(2006). At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.385
(2014). Newsworthiness and network gatekeeping on twitter: The role of social deviance. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media ICWSM 2014 (pp. 587–590). The AAAI Press.
(1989). Relation of sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: A multimethod study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.55
(1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
(1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12(3), 271–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993115
(2011). The media gaze: Representations of diversities in Canada. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
(2000). The roles of empathy, anger, and gender in predicting attitudes toward punitive, reparative, and preventative public policies. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402772
(1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107
(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(1989). Empathic emotions and justice in society. Social Justice Research, 3(4), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048080
(1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
(1982).
The simulation heuristic . In D. KahnemanP. SlovicA. TverskyEds., Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–208). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.(2014). The internet of pain: When suffering goes viral. Vice Motherboard. Retrieved from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/nzee9d/the-internet-of-pain-when-suffering-goes-viral
(2015). Beyond cognitive framing processes: Anger mediates the effects of responsibility framing on the preference for punitive measures. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12151
(2009). News values, media coverage, and audience attention: An analysis of direct and mediated causal relationships. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600111
(2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
(2000). Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
(1992). A tale of two curries: Counterfactual thinking and accident-related judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181012
(1986). Counterfactual thinking and victim compensation: A test of norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(4), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167286124014
(2016, June 9–13). The power of “no”: How negative frames influence empathy and pro-social behavior. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Fukuoka, Japan
(1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779108401856
(1997). Patterns of deviance in crime news. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02716.x
(1996). Reactions to surprising events: A paradigm for emotion research. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Society for Research on Emotions, 292–296.
(1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133
(1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 5(3), 161–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411034
(1989). Abnormal psychology. New York, NY: Norton.
(1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x
(1987). Deviance as a predictor of newsworthiness: Coverage of international events in the US media. Annals of the International Communication Association, 10(1), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1987.11678651
(2010).
If I look at the mass I will never act: Psychic numbing and genocide . In R. RoeserEd., Emotions and risky technologies (pp. 37–59). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.(1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838.
(1995). Counterfactual thinking and perceptions of rape. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_1
(2003). Assessing a new dimension of empathy: Empathic anger as a predictor of helping and punishing desires. Motivation and Emotion, 27(4), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026231622102
(1998). Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2784
