Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Emphasis Framing Effects of Conflicting Messages

Published Online:September 26, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000263

Abstract

Abstract. This study examined the emphasis framing effects of conflicting messages. Japanese undergraduate students (N = 199) received one message supporting whale-fishery competition with another message opposing it (the conflicting-message condition), arguing against the public demand for whale meat (the competing-message condition), or taking a neutral stance on whaling (the unbalanced-message condition). Although the conflicting and competing messages (vs. the unbalanced messages) had no effect on support for the government’s whaling policy, participants in the conflicting-message condition produced more thoughts about whale-fishery competition, had a more moderate belief about the issue, and perceived the importance of the belief to be lower than participants in the competing- and unbalanced-message conditions. These results suggest that messages organized by conflicting frames have unique effects on the availability, accessibility, and applicability of frame-relevant or -congruent beliefs.

References

  • Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). Debating clean energy: Frames, counter frames, and audiences. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1225–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bailey, J. L. (2009). Norway, the United States, and commercial whaling: Political culture and social movement framing. Journal of Environment & Development, 18(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496508329358 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blok, A. (2008). Contesting global norms: Politics of identity in Japanese pro-whaling countermobilization. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.39 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borah, P. (2011a). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borah, P. (2011b). Seeking more information and conversations: Influence of competitive frames and motivated processing. Communication Research, 38(3), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210376190 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brewer, P. R. (2002). Framing, value words, and citizens’ explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01957470290055510 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2005). Values, framing, and citizens’ thoughts about policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology, 26(6), 929–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00451.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018933 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it…and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chang, C. (2015). Motivated processing: How people perceive new covering novel or contradictory health research findings. Science Communication, 37(5), 602–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015597914 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540707055 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007c). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2010). Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000493 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004270234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2009). Evaluating science arguments: Evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016533 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Vreese, C. H., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322934 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35(3), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012458290 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dixon, G. N., McKeever, B. W., Holton, A. E., Clarke, C., & Eosco, G. (2015). The power of a picture: Overcoming scientific misinformation by communicating weight-of-evidence information with visual exemplars. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12159 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Druckman, J. N., Fein, J., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). A source of bias in public opinion stability. American Political Science Review, 106(2), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000123 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., & Dupree, C. (2014). Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Suppl. 4), 13593–13597. https://doi.org/10.1890/130220 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gerber, L. R., Morissette, L., Kaschner, K., & Pauly, D. (2009). Should whales be culled to increase fishery yield? Science, 323, 880–881. https://doi.org/10.1129/science.1169981 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Japan Fisheries Agency. (2014, May 13). Whales and whaling. Retrieved from http://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/j/whale/pdf/140513english.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Japan Fisheries Agency. (2017, July 17). Whaling affairs. Retrieved from http://www.jfa.maff.go.jp/e/whale/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaschner, K., & Pauly, D. (2005). Competition between marine mammals and fisheries: Food for thought. In D. J. SalemA. N. RowanEds., The state of the animals III: 2005 (pp. 95–117). Washington, DC: Humane Society Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kobayashi, K. (2018). Effects of conflicting scientific arguments on belief change: Argument evaluation and expert consensus perception as mediators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(4), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12499 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kortenkamp, K. V., & Basten, B. (2015). Environmental science in the media: Effects of opposing viewpoints on risk and uncertainty perceptions. Science Communication, 37(3), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015574016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011430064 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C., & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCright, A. M., Charters, M., Dentzman, K., & Dietz, T. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of climate change frames in the face of a climate change denial counter-frame. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12171 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morishita, J. (2006). Multiple analysis of the whaling issue: Understanding the dispute by a matrix. Marine Policy, 30, 802–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2006.02.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040–1067. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647553 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834831093 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. BarnettF. J. BolsterEds., Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365097024005002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roman, J., Estes, J. A., Morissette, L., Smith, C., Costa, D., McCarthy, J., … Smetacek, V. (2014). Whales as marine ecosystem engineers. Frontiers of Ecology and Environment, 12(7), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1890/130220 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2012). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. KenskiK. H. JamiesonEds., The Oxford handbook of political communication theories (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326_5.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. SarisP. M. SnidermanEds., Studies in public opinion (pp. 133–165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1(2), 1600008. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.779 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wise, D., & Brewer, P. R. (2010). Competing frames for a public health issue and their effects on public opinion. Mass Communication and Society, 13(4), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296077 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yeo, S. K., Cacciatore, M. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Runge, K., Su, L. Y, … Corley, E. A. (2014). Partisan amplification of risk: American perceptions of nuclear energy risk in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Energy Policy, 67, 727–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.061 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar