Skip to main content
Original Article

Procedural Arguments of Persuasive Games

An Elaboration Likelihood Perspective

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000278

Abstract. Studies into the effects of persuasive games – games designed to change players’ attitudes – have not yet yielded insight into the psychological processes involved in persuasion through procedural rhetoric. As a type of nonverbal argument embedded in game systems, it is an open question whether procedural rhetoric leads players to elaborate on a message in the same way as traditionally delivered arguments do. The current study tested 241 participants in a 2 (rhetoric strength) × 2 (level of cognitive load) between-subjects experiment, using game stimuli generated through analytical game design. Results indicate that procedural rhetoric strength meaningfully added to persuasive effects. Participants in high-cognitive-load conditions were not driven to process the games’ message differently. We outline the empirical process required to further investigate effects of procedural rhetoric on elaboration, and conclude how the current study contributes to conceptions of arguments borne out through gameplay.

References

  • Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cauberghe, V., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2010). Advergames: The impact of brand prominence and game repetition on brand responses. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367390101 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cicchirillo, V., & Mabry, A. (2016). Advergaming and healthy eating involvement. Internet Research, 26(3), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-04-2014-0091 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Grove, F., van Looy, J., Neys, J., & Jansz, J. (2012). Playing in school or at home? An exploration of the effects of context on educational game experience. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(2), 199–208. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de la Hera Conde-Pumpido, T. (2015). A theoretical model for the study of persuasive communication through digital games. In J. M. ParrenoC. R. MafeL. ScribnerEds., Engaging consumers through branded entertainment and convergent media (pp. 74–88). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8342-6 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de la Hera Conde-Pumpido, T. (2017). Persuasive gaming: Identifying the different types of persuasion through games. International Journal of Serious Games, 4(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i1.140 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deterding, S. (2016). The mechanic is not the (whole) message: Procedural rhetoric meets framing in Train & Playing History 2. In Proceedings of 1st International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, N. J., & Hoy, M. G. (2016). Parents’ presumed persuasion knowledge of children’s advergames: The influence of advertising disclosure modality and cognitive load. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 37(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2016.1171181 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frasca, G. (2003). September 12th. Newsgaming. Retrieved from http://www.newsgaming.com/games/index12.htm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gerling, K. M., Birk, M. V., & Mandryk, R. L. (2014). Combining explicit and implicit measures to study the effects of persuasive games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ‘14. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobs, R. S. (2018). Play to win over: Effects of persuasive games. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000124 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobs, R. S., Jansz, J., & de la Hera Conde-Pumpido, T. (2017). The key features of persuasive games: A model and case analysis. In R. KowertT. QuandtEds., New perspectives on the social aspects of digital gaming: Multiplayer 2 (pp. 153–171). Oxford, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Juul, J. (2013). The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A., Bradley, S. D., Park, B., Shin, M., & Chung, Y. (2006). Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology, 8(4), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0804_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2008). Leading national advertisers’ uses of advergames. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 30(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2008.10505243 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malliet, S., & Martens, H. (2010). Persuasive play: Extending the elaboration likelihood model to a game based learning context. In R. Van EckEd., Interdisciplinary models and tools for serious games: Emerging concepts and future directions (pp. 206–225). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peng, W., Lee, M., & Heeter, C. (2010). The effects of a serious game on role-taking and willingness to help. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01511.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perloff, R. (2014). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peters, S., & Leshner, G. (2013). Get in the game: The effects of game-product congruity and product placement proximity on game players’ processing of brands embedded in advergames. Journal of Advertising, 42(2–3), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.774584 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Priester, J., Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1999). Examining the psychological process underlying the sleeper effect: The elaboration likelihood model explanation. Media Psychology, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rawlings, T. (2012). My cotton picking life. Bristol, UK: GameTheNews. Retrieved from http://gamethenews.net/index.php/my-cotton-picking-life/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Redondo, I. (2012). The effectiveness of casual advergames on adolescents’ brand attitudes. European Journal of Marketing, 46(11–12), 1671–1688. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211260031 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roettl, J., Waiguny, M. K. J., & Terlutter, R. (2016). The persuasive power of advergames: A content analysis focusing on persuasive mechanisms in advergames. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 24(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2016.10.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruggiero, D. (2015). The effect of playing a persuasive game on attitude and affective learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.062 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruggiero, D., & Becker, K. (2015). Games you can’t win. The Computer Games Journal, 4(3–4), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-015-0013-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schreiner, C., Appel, M., Isberner, M.-B., & Richter, T. (2018). Argument strength and the persuasiveness of stories. Discourse Processes, 55(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1257406 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sharek, D., & Wiebe, E. (2014). Measuring video game engagement through the cognitive and affective dimensions. Simulation & Gaming, 45(4–5), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114554176 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sicart, M. (2011). Game studies – against procedurality. The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 11(3). Retrieved from http://gamestudies.org/1103/articles/sicart_ap First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steinemann, S. T., Iten, G. H., Opwis, K., Forde, S. F., Frasseck, L., & Mekler, E. D. (2017). Interactive narratives affecting social change: A closer look at the relationship between interactivity and prosocial behavior. Journal of Media Psychology, 29(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000211 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Multiple roles for source credibility under high elaboration: It’s all in the timing. Social Cognition, 25(4), 536–552. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.4.536 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van’t Riet, J., Meeuwes, A. C., van der Voorden, L., & Jansz, J. (2018). Investigating the effects of a persuasive digital game on immersion, identification, and willingness to help. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2018.1459301 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vyvey, T., Núñez Castellar, E. P., & Van Looy, J. (2018). Loaded with fun? the impact of enjoyment and cognitive load on brand retention in digital games. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1446370 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wasserman, J. A., & Banks, J. (2017). Details and dynamics: Mental models of complex systems in game-based learning. Simulation & Gaming, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117715056 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Werning, S. (2019). Analytical game design. Game-making as a cultural technique in a gamified society. In R. GlasS. LammesM. De LangeJ. RaessensI. De VriesEds., The playful citizen: Civic engagement in a mediatized culture (pp. 56–72). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcmxpds First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, R. H., & Williams, A. J. (2007). In pursuit of peace: Attitudinal and behavioral change with simulations and multiple identification theory. Simulation & Gaming, 38(4), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878107300675 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar