Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Positive and Negative Wayfinding Inclinations, Choice of Navigation Aids, and How They Relate to Personality Traits

Published Online:September 10, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000302

Abstract

Abstract. This study aimed to examine the relationship between people’s self-reported wayfinding inclinations, their preference for certain navigation aids (maps vs. GPS vs. verbal directions), and their personality traits. A sample of 222 undergraduates completed questionnaires on personality traits, wayfinding inclinations and preferred navigation aids, and two spatial tasks. The results showed that spatial ability, positive wayfinding inclinations and negative wayfinding inclinations are distinct factors. Only wayfinding inclinations were related to personality traits: positive inclinations correlated positively, and negative inclinations inversely with Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Openness. Negative inclinations were only associated with poor Emotional stability. Further, Conscientiousness and Openness were correlated with a preference for map use, and Agreeableness with a preference for verbal directions. Analyzing facets of these personality traits clarified the relations. These findings are discussed within the spatial cognition domain, broadening the array of individual factors (such as spatial attitudes and personality traits) and their relation to consider in defining individual spatial profiles.

References

  • Barron, L. G., & Rose, M. R. (2013). Relative validity of distinct spatial abilities: An example with implications for diversity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12049 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2019). Daily strengths use and employee well-being: The moderating role of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92, 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12243 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bryant, K. J. (1982). Personality correlates of sense of direction and geographical orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1318–1324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1318 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bryant, D. J. (1997). Representing space in language and perception. Mind & Language, 12, 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00047 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (2008). Big Five Questionnaire. Florence, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crescentini, C., Fabbro, F., & Urgesi, C. (2014). Mental spatial transformations of objects and bodies: Different developmental trajectories in children from 7 to 11 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 50, 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033627 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Condon, D. M., Wilt, J., Cohen, C. A., Revelle, W., Hegarty, M., & Uttal, D. H. (2015). Sense of direction: General factor saturation and associations with the Big-Five traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Beni, R., Meneghetti, C., Fiore, F., Gava, L., & Borella, E. (2014). Batteria VS. Abilità visuo-spaziali nell’arco di vita adulta [VS Battery. Visuo-spatial abilities in the adult life span]. Florence, Italy: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gardony, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2013). How navigational aids impair spatial memory: Evidence for divided attention. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 13, 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2013.792821 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hamburger, K., & Röser, F. (2014). The role of landmark modality and familiarity in human wayfinding. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73, 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000139 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, T. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34, 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karimpur, H., & Hamburger, K. (2016). Multimodal integration of spatial information: The influence of object-related factors and self-reported strategies. Frontiers of Psychology, 7, 1443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01443 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. FreksaC. HabelK. F. WenderEds., Spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 1–17). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kozlowski, L. T., & Bryant, K. J. (1977). Sense of direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.590 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation, spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29, 745–756. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200477 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISERL V: Analysis of linear structural relationship by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. Chicago, IL: National Educational Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544230 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meneghetti, C., Borella, E., Pastore, M., & De Beni, R. (2014). The role of spatial abilities and self-assessments in cardinal point orientation across the lifespan. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muffato, V., Toffalini, E., Meneghetti, C., Carbone, E., & De Beni, R. (2017). Individual visuo-spatial factors and familiar environment knowledge: A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Münzer, S., Fehringer, B. C., & Kühl, T. (2016). Validation of a 3-factor structure of spatial strategies and relations to possession and usage of navigational aids. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Münzer, S., Zimmer, H. D., Schwalm, M., Baus, J., & Aslan, I. (2006). Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.08.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nys, M., Gyselinck, V., Orriols, E., & Hickmann, M. (2014). Landmark and route knowledge in children’s spatial representation of a virtual environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01522 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pazzaglia, F., & Meneghetti, C. (2017). Acquiring spatial knowledge from different sources and perspectives: Abilities, strategies and representations. In J. M. ZacksH. A. TaylorEds., Representations in mind and world. Essays inspired by Barbara Tversky (pp. 120–134). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Ronconi, L. (2018). Tracing a route and finding a shortcut: The working memory, motivational, and personality factors involved. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, G. E. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thurstone, L. L., & Thurstone, T. G. (1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. Psychometric Monographs, 2, 94. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Walkowiak, S., Foulsham, T., & Eardley, A. F. (2015). Individual differences and personality correlates of navigational performance in the virtual route learning task. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.041 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weisberg, S. M., Schinazi, V. R., Newcombe, N. S., Shipley, T. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2014). Variations in cognitive maps: Understanding individual differences in navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035261 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wen, W., Ishikawa, T., & Sato, T. (2014). Instruction of verbal and spatial strategies for the learning about large-scale spaces. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar