Personality Traits and Socio-Demographic Variables as Predictors of Political Interest and Voting Behavior in a British Cohort
Abstract
Abstract. This study examines the associations between socio-demographic variables, the Big Five personality traits, and the extent of political interest as well as voting behavior, in a large, nationally representative sample in the UK. The contribution of the Big Five personality traits to political issues over and above demography, education, and social class was the central focus. The analytic sample comprised 7,135 cohort members with complete data. Correlational analysis showed that personality traits and demographic variables were significantly associated with both political interest and voting behavior. Regression analysis showed that sex, education and occupation, and four of the five personality traits were significantly and independently associated with political interest in adulthood. Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Openness were significantly and positively associated with political interest, whereas Conscientiousness was negatively associated with the outcome variable. Personality accounted for incremental variance. Further, parental social class, education and occupation, and traits Emotional Stability and Openness were all significantly and positively associated with voting behavior. The results confirm other studies and show that personality traits account for unique variance over and above demographic factors in predicting political interests and behaviors.
References
2017). Individual differences and political contexts – The role of personality traits and direct democracy in explaining political protest. Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12227
(2015). Personality traits and party identification over time. European Journal of Political Research, 54, 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12070
(2016). Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(2011). Personality traits, political attitudes and the propensity to vote. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01935.x
(2014). Personality traits (“Big Five”) and the propensity to political protest. Political Psychology, 35, 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12043
(2006). Personality and politics. Political Psychology, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x
(1992). NEO-PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
(1972). From birth to seven. London, UK: Longman.
(2014). The relationship between genes, psychological traits, and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 888–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12100
(2008). Childhood intelligence predicts voter turnout, voting preferences, and political involvement in adulthood: The 1970 British Cohort Study. Intelligence, 36, 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.09.001
(2015). Personality, childhood experience and political ideology. Political Psychology, 36, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12075
(2008). Political interest, cognitive ability, and personality. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340800015X
(2012). Personality and legislative politics: The big five trait dimensions among US state legislators. Political Psychology, 33, 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00870.x
(1978). The psychological basis of ideology. Lancaster, UK: MTP Press.
(2017). Personality traits and political ideology. Political Psychology, 38, 881–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12347
(2003). Changing Britain, changing lives: Three generations at the turn of the century. London, UK: Institute of Education.
(1976). Britain’s 16-year-olds. London, UK: National Children’s Bureau.
(2018). Personality and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.020
(2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000031
(2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. The Journal of Politics, 73, 692–706. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000399
(1999).
(A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower level facets of several five-factor models . In I. MervieldeI. DearyF. De FruytF. OstendorfEds., Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.2013). Personality traits and political participation. Political Psychology, 34, 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12008
(2015). Political attitude develop independently of personality traits. PLoS One, 10, e0134072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134072
(2014). Personality and politics. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.002
(2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1952
(2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156
(1977). Registrar General’s social classes: Origins and uses. Population Trends, 8, 1–7.
(2012). The impact of the HEXACO personality model in predicting socio-political attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.049
(2017). Problems with the big five assessment in the world values survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.042
(1986).
(Social class and occupation . In R. BurgessEd., Key variables in social investigation (pp. 123–152). London, UK: Routledge.2006). A new big five. Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
(2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000173
(2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990359
(2014). A non-reductive science of personality, character, and well-being must take the person’s worldview into account. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 961. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00961
(2013). Beyond total effects: Exploring the interplay of personality and attitudes in affecting turnout in the 2009 German federal election. Political Psychology, 34, 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12031
(2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00568.x
(2014). Gender differences in the effects of personality traits on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 34, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.10.005
(2016). Personality traits, political attitudes and vote choice. Electoral Studies, 44, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.07.004
(2017). Big five personality traits, political participation, and civic engagement: Evidence from 24 countries. Social Science Quarterly, 98, 1406–1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12380
(2017). The relationship between genes, personality traits and political interest. Political Research Quarterly, 70, 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917698045
(2018). Genes, personality traits, and the sense of civic duty. American Political Research, 46, 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17710760
(2014). Personality, negativity and political participation. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2, 164–182. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.280
(