Abstract
Abstract. Two studies tested the hypothesis that self-reported sense of smell (i.e., metacognitive insight into one’s olfactory ability) predicts disgust sensitivity and disgust reactivity. Consistent with our predictions two studies demonstrated that disgust correlates with self-reported sense of smell. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated, from an individual difference perspective, that trait-like differences in disgust relate to self-reported sense of smell. Physical forms of disgust (i.e., sexual and pathogen disgust) drove this association. However, the association between self-reported sense of smell and disgust sensitivity is small, suggesting that it is likely not a good proxy for disgust sensitivity. The results of Study 2 extended this finding by demonstrating that individual differences in self-reported sense of smell influence how individuals react to a disgusting olfactory stimulus. Those who reported having a better sense of smell (or better insight into their olfactory ability) found a disgusting smell significantly more noxious as compared to participants reporting having a poor sense of smell (or poor insight into their olfactory ability). The current findings suggest that a one-item measure of self-reported sense of smell may be an effective tool in disgust research.
References
2007). Disgust sensitivity predicts the insula and pallidal response to pictures of disgusting foods. European Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3422–3428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05604.x
(2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503
(2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
(1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7
(1997). “Sniffin’ sticks”: Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chemical Senses, 22, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/22.1.39
(2008). Core, animal-reminder, and contamination disgust: Three kinds of disgust with distinct personality, behavioral, physiological, and clinical correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1243–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.009
(2005). Disgust sensitivity as a mediator of the sex differences in contamination fears. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.025
(2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
(1997).
(Disgust: Preadaptation and the cultural evolution of a food-based emotion . In H. MacBethEd., Food preferences and taste (pp. 65–82). Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.493
(2005). Neural responses of OCD patients towards disorder-relevant, generally disgust-inducing and fear-inducing pictures. Journal of Psychophysiology, 57, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.12.013
(2010). Processing of disgusted faces is facilitated by odor primes: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 53, 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.012
(2008). The Odor Awareness Scale: A new scale for measuring positive and negative odor awareness. Chemical Senses, 33, 725–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn038
(2005). Influences of disgust sensitivity on hemodynamic responses towards a disgust-inducing film clip. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.01.010
(2011). Sex differences and sex similarities in disgust sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.003
(2011). Smells like safe sex olfactory pathogen primes increase intentions to use condoms. Psychological Science, 22, 478–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611400096
(2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015474
(