Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Exploring the Unique and Shared Variance of Propensity to Trust and Suspicion Propensity

Published Online:June 17, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000294

Abstract

Abstract. Across two studies, we explored the relationship of propensity to trust – a general willingness to trust others (Mayer, Davis, & Schoorman, 1995) – and suspicion propensity – a disposition toward being suspicious (Calhoun et al., 2017) – to determine if the constructs are distinct and account for unique variance in relevant outcomes. We used exploratory structural equation modeling to investigate whether propensity to trust and suspicion propensity are separate constructs. Then, we investigated the unique predictive validity of each trait on criteria of interest. We found some evidence that propensity to trust and suspicion propensity are unique, yet related, constructs with unique predictive validity. Theoretical and practical implications, as well as limitations, of this research are discussed.

References

  • Alarcon, G. M., Lyons, J. B., & Christensen, J. C. (2016). The effect of propensity to trust and familiarity on perceptions of trustworthiness over time. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alarcon, G. M., Lyons, J. B., Christensen, J. C., Bowers, M. A., Klosterman, S. L., & Capiola, A. (2018). The role of propensity to trust and the five factor model across the trust process. Journal of Research in Personality, 75, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.05.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bobko, P., Barelka, A. J., & Hirshfield, L. M. (2014). The construct of state-level suspicion: A model and research agenda for automated and information technology (IT) contexts. Human Factors, 56, 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813497052 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bobko, P., Barelka, A. J., Hirshfield, L. M., & Lyons, J. B. (2014). The construct of suspicion and how it can benefit theories and models in organizational science. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9360-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046900 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Calhoun, C., Bobko, P., Schuelke, M., Jessup, S., Ryan, T., Walter, C., … Khazon, S. (2017). Suspicion, trust, and automation. (SRA International Inc. Publication Report No. AFRL-RH-WP-TR-2017-0002). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/de09/24c9e525b8003a28c75eec1554baacb6d15a.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire (Unpublished manuscript). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2136404 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1241–1255. https://doi.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Belief in a just world-validation correlates of 2 scales. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 596–615. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dodeen, H. (2015). The effects of positively and negatively worded items on the factor structure of the UCLA loneliness scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914548325 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Drążkowski, D., Kaczmarek, L. D., & Kashdan, T. B. (2017). Gratitude pays: A weekly gratitude intervention influences monetary decisions, physiological responses, and emotional experiences during a trust-related social interaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.043 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Echebarria-Echabe, A. (2010). Effects of suspicion on willingness to engage in systematic processing of persuasive arguments. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366412 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Evans, A. M., & Revelle, W. (2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15, 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jones, S. L., & Shah, P. P. (2016). Diagnosing the locus of trust: A temporal perspective for trustor, trustee, and dyadic influences on perceived trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000041 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kelloway, E. K., Loughlin, C., Barling, J., & Nault, A. (2002). Self‐reported counterproductive behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors: Separate but related constructs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00201 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kramer, R. (2001). Organizational paranoia: Origins and dynamics. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23002-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926620 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lyons, J. B., Stokes, C. K., Eschleman, K. J., Alarcon, G. M., & Barelka, A. (2011). Trustworthiness and IT suspicion: An examination of the nomological network. Human Factors, 53, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811406726 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right – camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 439–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mooradian, T., Renzl, B., & Matzler, K. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37, 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606073424 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Naber, A. M., Payne, S. C., & Webber, S. S. (2018). The relative influence of trustor and trustee individual differences on peer assessments of trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 128, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Naef, M., & Schupp, J. (2009). Measuring trust: Experiments and surveys in contrast and combination. Berlin, Germany: DIW Berlin. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1367375 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nohe, C., & Hertel, G. (2017). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analytic test of underlying mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01364 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. (2006). Testing complex correlational hypotheses using structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 520–543. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1304_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00997.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ryan, T. J., Walter, C., Alarcon, G. M., Gamble, R., Jessup, S. A., & Capiola, A. (2019). The influence of personality on code reuse. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 52, 5805–5814. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10125/60016 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 344–354. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24348410 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sinaceur, M. (2010). Suspending judgment to create value: Suspicion and trust in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated Rating Scale construction: An introduction (No. 82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tomaka, J., & Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.732 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trussler, M., & Soroka, S. (2013, June). Consumer demand for cynical and negative news frames. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the Political Science Association Victoria, BC First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Westfall, J., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS One, 11, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152719 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhou, H., & Fishbach, A. (2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000056 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1977). Belief in a just world and trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(77)90039-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar