Abstract
Each day for two weeks participants described how often they had used four types of humor that day: affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, and self-defeating humor. Participants also completed the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ), the Coping with Humor scale (CHS), a measure of the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality, and the Rosenberg Self-esteem scale (RSE). A series of multilevel analyses (days nested within persons) found that Extraversion was positively related to the frequency of use of all four types of humor, whereas the other factors of the FFM were not related to daily humor use when they were included in analyses with Extraversion. Controlling for the factors of the FFM, self-esteem was negatively related to the daily use of aggressive and self-defeating humor, whereas Coping with Humor was positively related to the daily use of aggressive and self-defeating humor. Although relationships between our measures of the daily use of humor and the FFM, CHS, and RSE were similar to relationships between the HSQ and these measures, there were enough differences to suggest that our daily measures of humor provided insights into the use of humor that complemented and extended the insights provided by dispositional measures such as the HSQ.
About the authors
John B. Nezlek is a professor of psychology at SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznan, and he is a professor emeritus of psychology at the College of William & Mary. His primary research interest is individual differences in everyday experience. Email: jbnezl@wm.edu
Peter L. Derks is a professor emeritus of psychology at the College of William & Mary. His primary research interests are cognition and creativity. He has been conducting research on humor for more than 50 years.
References
Affleck, Glenn, Alex Zautra, Howard Tennen & Stephen Armeli. 1999. Multilevel daily process designs for consulting and clinical psychology: A preface for the perplexed. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67. 746–754.10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.746Search in Google Scholar
Caird, Sara & Rod A. Martin. 2014. Relationship-focused humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: A repeated-measures design. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 27. 227–247.10.1515/humor-2014-0015Search in Google Scholar
Guenter, Hannes, Bert H. J. Schreurs, Ij H. Van Emmerik, Wout Gijsbers & Ad Van Iterson. 2013. How adaptive and maladaptive humor influence well-being at work: A diary study. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 26. 573–594.10.1515/humor-2013-0032Search in Google Scholar
Heintz, Sonja. 2017. Putting a spotlight on daily humor behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with personality, subjective well-being, and humor styles. Personality and Individual Differences 104(1). 407–412.10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.042Search in Google Scholar
Heintz, Sonja & Willibald Ruch. 2015. An examination of the convergence between the conceptualization and the measurement of humor styles: A study of the construct validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 28. 611–633.10.1515/humor-2015-0095Search in Google Scholar
Heintz, Sonja & Willibald Ruch. 2016. Reply to Martin (2015): Why our conclusions hold. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 29. 125–129.10.1515/humor-2015-0132Search in Google Scholar
Heintz, Sonja & Willibald Ruch. 2018. Can self-defeating humor make you happy? Cognitive interviews reveal the adaptive side of the self-defeating humor style Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 31. 451–472.10.1515/humor-2017-0089Search in Google Scholar
John, Oliver P. & Sanjay Srivastava. 1999. The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 102–138. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Alan B. Krueger, David A. Schkade, Norbert Schwarz & Arthur Stone. 2004. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science 306(5702). 1776–1180.10.1126/science.1103572Search in Google Scholar
Leary, Mark, Ellen S. Tambor, Sonja K. Terdal & Deborah L. Downs. 1999. Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68. 518–530.10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518Search in Google Scholar
Lefcourt, Herbert M. & Rod A. Martin 1986. Humor and life stress: Antidote to adversity. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4900-9Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A. 1996. The Situational Humor Response Questionnaire (SHRQ) and Coping Humor Scale (CHS): A decade of research findings. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 28. 635–639.10.1515/humr.1996.9.3-4.251Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A. 2007. Psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A. 2015. On the challenges of measuring humor styles: Response to Heintz and Ruch. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 28. 635–639.10.1515/humor-2015-0096Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A. & Herbert M. Lefcourt. 1983. Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47. 1313–1324.10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1313Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A. & Herbert M. Lefcourt. 1984. The Situational Humor Response Questionnaire: A quantitative measure of the sense of humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47. 145–155.10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.145Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A., Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray & Kelly Weir. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 37(1). 48–75.10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2Search in Google Scholar
McGhee, Paul E. 1999. The laughter remedy: Health, healing and the amuse system. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Search in Google Scholar
Mendiburo-Seguel, Andres, Dario Paez & Francisco Martinez-Sanchez. 2015. Humor styles and personality: A meta-analysis of the relation between humor styles and the Big Five personality traits. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 56. 335–340.10.1111/sjop.12209Search in Google Scholar
Nezlek, John B. 2012. Diary methods for social and personality psychology. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446287903Search in Google Scholar
Raudenbush, Stephen W., Anthony S. Bryk & Richard Congdon. 2011. HLM 7 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Search in Google Scholar
Reis, Harry T. & Shelly L. Gable. 2000. Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 190–222. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rnic, Katerina, David J. A. Dozois & Rod A. Martin. 2016. Cognitive distortions, humor styles, and depression. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 12(3). 348–362.10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1118Search in Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Morris. 1965. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400876136Search in Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald. 1998. The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald & Sonja Heintz. 2013. Humour styles, personality, and psychological well-being: What’s humour got to do with it? European Journal of Humour Research 1(4). 1–24.10.7592/EJHR2013.1.4.ruchSearch in Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald & Sonja Heintz. 2017. Experimentally manipulating items informs on the (limited) construct and criterion validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology 8. 616.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00616Search in Google Scholar
Stieger, Stefan, Anton K. Formann & Christoph Burger. 2011. Humor styles and their relationship to explicit and implicit self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences 50. 747–750.10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.025Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
