Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton August 28, 2019

On the dimensionality of humorous conduct and associations with humor traits and behaviors

  • Willibald Ruch

    Willibald Ruch is a Full Professor of Psychology at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. His research interests are in the field of personality and assessment, with a special focus on humor and laughter, cheerfulness, and smiling. In his doctoral dissertation at the University of Graz (Austria) in 1980, he developed a taxonomy of jokes and cartoons and studied their relation to personality. His more recent work, together with his research team at the University of Zürich, includes humor from a positive psychology perspective, the effectiveness of humor training programs and clown interventions, the ability to laugh at oneself, the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia), and the measurement of humor. He is a past President of the International Society for Humor Studies.

    EMAIL logo
    and Sonja Heintz

    Sonja Heintz is a senior research and teaching assistant at the Department of Psychology at the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Her main research interests in humor are individual differences (humor and comic styles, dimensions of the sense of humor), measurement (humor questionnaires and humor-related behaviors), and positive psychology (relationships of humor with character strengths and well-being, virtuous forms of humor).

From the journal HUMOR

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to explore higher-order dimensions of humorous conduct derived from 100 non-redundant and comprehensive statements. These dimensions are validated in self- and other-reports and their criterion validity is assessed by relating them to other humor concepts (temperamental basis of the sense of humor, attitudes towards laughter and being laughed at, humor appreciation and creation). Four broad dimensions (mean-spirited/earthy, entertaining, inept, and reflective/benign) were supported in self- and other-reports, and two narrower dimensions (laughter and canned) were found in self-reports. These dimensions covered affective, cognitive, and dysfunctional aspects of humorous conduct and spanned across humorous temperament, attitudes towards laughter and being laughed at as well as humor appreciation and creation. These six dimensions can serve as a reference framework and higher-order categories to which humor scales could be assigned. Future studies need to test the comprehensiveness of these dimensions and conduct further validation studies.

About the authors

Willibald Ruch

Willibald Ruch is a Full Professor of Psychology at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. His research interests are in the field of personality and assessment, with a special focus on humor and laughter, cheerfulness, and smiling. In his doctoral dissertation at the University of Graz (Austria) in 1980, he developed a taxonomy of jokes and cartoons and studied their relation to personality. His more recent work, together with his research team at the University of Zürich, includes humor from a positive psychology perspective, the effectiveness of humor training programs and clown interventions, the ability to laugh at oneself, the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia), and the measurement of humor. He is a past President of the International Society for Humor Studies.

Sonja Heintz

Sonja Heintz is a senior research and teaching assistant at the Department of Psychology at the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Her main research interests in humor are individual differences (humor and comic styles, dimensions of the sense of humor), measurement (humor questionnaires and humor-related behaviors), and positive psychology (relationships of humor with character strengths and well-being, virtuous forms of humor).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Martin Lampert for his valuable feedback on previous versions of this manuscript, and Liliane Müller for her help in collecting the data and in the humor creation ratings.

References

Cattell, Raymond B. 1973. Personality and mood by questionnaire. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Craik, Kenneth H., Martin D. Lampert & Arvalea J. Nelson. 1993. Research manual for the humorous behavior Q-sort deck. Berkley, CA: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Search in Google Scholar

Craik, Kenneth H., Martin D. Lampert & Arvalea J. Nelson. 1996. Sense of humor and styles of everyday humorous conduct. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 9(3/4). 273–302.10.1515/humr.1996.9.3-4.273Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Mark A. & Thomas E. Ford. 2008. Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 21. 283–321.10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Lewis R. 2006. Doing it all Bass-Ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. Journal of Research in Personality 40. 374–358.10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Heintz, Sonja. 2017. Putting a spotlight on daily humor behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with personality, subjective well-being, and humor styles. Personality and Individual Differences 104(1). 407–412.10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.042Search in Google Scholar

Heintz, Sonja. 2019. Locating eight comic styles in basic and broad concepts of humor: Findings from self-reports and behavior tests. Current Psychology. Advance online publication.10.1007/s12144-019-00179-zSearch in Google Scholar

Kirsh, Gillian A. & Nicholas A. Kuiper. 2003. Positive and negative aspects of sense of humor: Associations with the constructs of individualism and relatedness. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 16. 33–62.10.1515/humr.2003.004Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, Gabriele & Willibald Ruch. 1993. The cartoon punch line production test - CPPT. Unpublished manuscript. Düsseldorf, Germany: University of Düsseldorf, Department of Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, Gabriele & Willibald Ruch. 1996. Sources of variance in current sense of humor inventories: How much substance, how much method variance? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 9(3–4). 363–379.10.1515/humr.1996.9.3-4.363Search in Google Scholar

Lampert, Martin. 2018. The intersection between humor styles and humor types. Paper presented at the 30th International Society of Humor Studies Conference, Tallinn University, June 25–29.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano & Jos M. F. Ten Berge. 2006. Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology 2. 57–64.10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Rod A. & Thomas E. Ford. 2018. The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Rod A. & Herbert M. Lefcourt. 1984. The situational humor response questionnaire: A quantitative measure of the sense of humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47. 145–155.10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.145Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Rod A., Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray & Kelly Weir. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 37(1). 48–75.10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2Search in Google Scholar

McGhee, Paul E. 2010. Humor as survival training for a stressed-out world: The 7 humor habits program. Bloomington: Author House.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Liliane. 2016. Sense of humor and positive psychology: Investigating dimensions of sense of humor, character strengths and life satisfaction. Zurich, Switzerland: University of Zurich, Department of Psychology Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Liliane & Willibald Ruch. 2011. Humor and strengths of character. The Journal of Positive Psychology 6. 368–376.10.1080/17439760.2011.592508Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald. 1992. Assessment of appreciation of humor: Studies with the 3 WD humor test. In Charles D. Spielberger & James N. Butcher (eds.), Advances in personality assessment, vol. 9, 27–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald (ed.). 2007. The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110804607Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald. 2008. The psychology of humor. In Victor Raskin (ed.), A primer of humor research, 17–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.17Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald. 2012a. Towards a new structural model of the sense of humor: Preliminary findings. AAAI Fall Symposium: Artificial Intelligence of Humor 2. 68–75.Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald. 2012b. Four dimensions of humor scale. University of Zurich Unpublished manual.Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald. in press. Domains of humor: Challenges from psychology. In S. Attardo (ed.), Script-based semantics: Foundations and applications. A Festschrift for Victor Raskin. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald, Ursula Beermann & T. Proyer René. 2009. Investigating the humor of gelotophobes: Does feeling ridiculous equal being humorless? Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 22. 111–143.10.1515/HUMR.2009.006Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald & Sonja Heintz. 2016. The German version of the humor styles questionnaire: Psychometric properties and overlap with other styles of humor. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 12(3). 434–455.10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1116Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald, Sonja Heintz, Tracey Platt, Lisa Wagner, & René T. Proyer 2018. Broadening humor: Comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability. Frontiers in Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology 9(6).10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald & Sonja Heintz. 2019. Humor production and creativity: Overview and recommendations. In Sarah R. Luria, John Baer & James C. Kaufman (eds.), Creativity and humor, 1–42. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-813802-1.00001-6Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald, Jennifer Hofmann, Tracey Platt & René T. Proyer. 2014. The state-of-the art in gelotophobia research: A review and some theoretical extensions. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 27(1). 23–45.10.1515/humor-2013-0046Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald, Gabriele Köhler & van Thriel. Christoph. 1996. Assessing the “humorous temperament”: Construction of the facet and standard trait forms of the state-trait-cheerfulness-inventory-STCI. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 9(3/4). 303–339.10.1515/humr.1996.9.3-4.303Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald & René T. Proyer. 2008. The fear of being laughed at: Individual and group differences in gelotophobia. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 21(1). 47–67.10.1515/HUMOR.2008.002Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald & René T. Proyer. 2009. Extending the study of gelotophobia: On gelotophiles and katagelasticists. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 22. 183–212.10.1515/HUMR.2009.009Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald, René T. Proyer, Claudia Esser & Otilia Mitrache. 2011. Cheerfulness and everyday humorous conduct. In Romanian Academy, “George Barit“ Institute of History, Department of Social Research (ed.), Studies and researches in social sciences, vol. 18, 67–87. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Argonaut Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-08-28
Published in Print: 2019-10-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2018-0119/html
Scroll to top button