Automatic Antecedents of Discrimination
Abstract
Abstract. In increasingly diverse societies, discrimination against social groups and their members continues to be a public and political concern. Research has addressed three basic cognitive processes that precede discrimination: categorization, stereotype/prejudice activation, and stereotype/prejudice application, suggesting that these processes occur in an automatic fashion. However, there are multiple components of automaticity, including unawareness, efficiency, unintentionality, and uncontrollability. Most of the previous research implies that these components of automaticity converge with respect to cognitive antecedents of discrimination. Here, we review evidence on the distinct components of automaticity in order to assess whether (a) categorization, (b) stereotype/prejudice activation, and (c) stereotype/prejudice application occur (1) without awareness, (2) efficiently, and (3) goal-independently. We highlight evidence indicating convergence or divergence of the automaticity components during each of the processing stages. This analysis provides readers with an up-to-date review that helps to evaluate whether a multi-component approach to automaticity is of additional benefit in aggregating knowledge about the cognitive antecedents of discrimination. We discuss open issues and avenues for future research.
References
2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.652
(2008). Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: The role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.60
(1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.272
(1994).
(The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition . In R. S. WyerT. K. SrullEds., Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes; Applications (2nd ed., Vols. 1–2, pp. 1–40). New York, NY: Erlbaum.2006). Stereotype activation and control of race bias: Cognitive control of inhibition and its impairment by alcohol. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.272
(2012). Alcohol effects on performance monitoring and adjustment: Affect modulation and impairment of evaluative cognitive control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023664
(2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18, 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2000.18.4.329
(1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1142
(2004). The automaticity of race and afrocentric facial features in social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 763–778. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.763
(2012).
(Social categorization and the perception of social groups . In S. T. FiskeC. N. MacraeEds., The Sage handbook of social cognition (pp. 318–336). London, UK: Sage.1998).
(Stereotype activation and inhibition . In R. S. J. WyerEd., Advances in social cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 1–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.1988).
(A dual process model of impression formation . In T. K. SrullR. S. Wyer Jr.Eds., A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02367.x
(1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1329
(2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314
(2007). Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1006–1023. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006
(2004). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science, 15, 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00760.x
(2007). Hostility-related prejudice against Turks in adolescents: Masked affective priming allows for a differentiation of automatic prejudice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 245–256.
(2009). When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.001
(2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.835
(2009).
(Automaticity and control in stereotyping and prejudice . In T. D. NelsonEd., Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 61–87). New York, NY: Psychology Press.2007). Racial ingroup and outgroup attention biases revealed by event-related brain potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm012
(2012). The effects of expectancy violations on early attention to race in an impression-formation paradigm. Social Neuroscience, 7, 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.609906
(2010).
(Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview . In J. F. DovidioM. HewstoneP. GlickV. M. EssesEds., Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 3–28). London, UK: Sage.2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS One, 7, 7.
(1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233009
(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
(2017). The shooter bias: Replicating the classic effect and introducing a novel paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.009
(2010). Willing and able: How internal motivation and failure help to overcome prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209343116
(1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.31
(2007). Further ironies of suppression: Stereotype and counterstereotype accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 833–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.09.001
(2010). Attentional influences on affective priming: Does categorisation influence spontaneous evaluations of multiply categorisable objects? Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1008–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903112712
(1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60, 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509
(2005).
(Compensatory automaticity: Unconscious volition is not an oxymoron . In R. R. HassinJ. S. UlemanJ. A. BarghR. R. HassinJ. S. UlemanJ. A. BarghEds., The new unconscious (pp. 171–195). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2008). Implicit motivation to control prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.002
(2011). Accounting for successful control of implicit racial bias: The roles of association activation, response monitoring, and overcoming bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1534–1545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211414064
(2006). Ego-depletion and prejudice: Separating automatic and controlled components. Social Cognition, 24, 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.111
(2004). Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000046430.65485.1f
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
(2007). Implicit and explicit stereotyping of adolescents. Social Justice Research, 20, 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0037-9
(2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1369. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035028
(1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1031(77)80007-3
(2016). Affiliative social tuning reduces the activation of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215583518
(2008). Reduced constituent category application in surprising combinations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 247–251. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.2.247-252
(2011). An inkblot for sexual preference: A semantic variant of the Affect Misattribution Procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 676–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.508260
(2013).
(Imaging the pictures in our heads: Using ERPs to inform our understanding of social categorization . In B. DerksD. ScheepersN. EllemersB. DerksD. ScheepersN. EllemersEds., Neuroscience of prejudice and intergroup relations (pp. 25–44). New York, NY: Psychology Press.2004). Tracking the timecourse of social perception: The effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264335
(2005). The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.1.21
(2012). Different brain mechanisms between stereotype activation and application: Evidence from an ERP study. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.580348
(2008). Internal motivation to respond without prejudice and automatic egalitarian goal activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1514–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.003
(2010). Person categorization and automatic racial stereotyping effects on weapon identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1073–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210375817
(2005). Types of high self-esteem and prejudice: How implicit self-esteem relates to ethnic discrimination among high explicit self-esteem individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271580
(2007). Priming of semantic classifications by novel subliminal prime words. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.12.002
(2005). Social categorization and fit detection under cognitive load: Efficient or effortful? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.266
(2014). How malleable is categorization by race? Evidence for competitive category use in social categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036609
(2012). Deciding the fate of others: The cognitive underpinnings of racially biased juror decision making. Journal of General Psychology, 139, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.686462
(2012). Disentangling stereotype activation and stereotype application in the stereotype misperception task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028764
(1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7
(2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522
(2003). Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the “social facilitation” of prejudice in anticipated public contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.277
(1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez–Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753.
(2002). The role of awareness: Divergent automatic stereotype activation and implicit judgment correction. Social Cognition, 20, 321–351. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.4.321.19907
(2015). Theory building, replication, and behavioral priming: Where do we need to go from here? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614567231
(1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808–817. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.808
(1997). On the activation of social stereotypes: The moderating role of processing objectives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1328
(1993). Processing load and memory for stereotype-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902868793
(2010).
(Perceiving people . In S. T. FiskeD. T. GilbertG. LindzeyEds., Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 428–463). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.2005). Understanding others: The face and person construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 686–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.686
(2010). Processing style and person recognition: Exploring the face inversion effect. Visual Cognition, 18, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902868793
(2012). When a new group identity does harm on the spot: Stereotype threat in newly created groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.840
(2006). On construing others: Category and stereotype activation from facial cues. Social Cognition, 24, 540–562. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.540
(1998). Suppression as a stereotype control strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_4
(2013).
(Automaticity and control in stereotyping and prejudice: The revolutionary role of social cognition across three decades of research . In D. E. CarlstonEd., The Oxford handbook of social cognition, Chapter xvii (pp. 74–94). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 948.2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
(1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.167
(2011). Egalitarian goals trigger stereotype inhibition: A proactive form of stereotype control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.014
(2000). Preconsciously controlling stereotyping: Implicitly activated egalitarian goals prevent the activation of stereotypes. Social Cognition, 18, 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2000.18.2.151
(2012). Implicit stereotyping and medical decisions: Unconscious stereotype activation in practitioners’ thoughts about African Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 996–1001. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300591
(2011). Seeing race: N170 responses to race and their relation to automatic racial attitudes and controlled processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3153–3161. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00014
(2008). Implicit motivation to control prejudice moderates the effect of cognitive depletion on unintended discrimination. Social Cognition, 26, 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.4.401
(2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181
(2016). Replicable effects of primes on human behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000201
(2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
(2002). Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00006-9
(1994). Stereotypes and mental life: The case of the motivated but thwarted tactician. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1015
(1990). Evidence for the automaticity of ageism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90035-k
(2016). Priming race: Does the mind inhibit categorization by race at encoding or recall? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615602934
(1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
(2005). Categorizing others: The dynamics of person construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.467
(2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013194
(2013). Priming intelligent behavior: An elusive phenomenon. PLoS One, 8, e56515.
(1999). Reactions to a Black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.885
(1986). Development of automatism of social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.246
(1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1139–1152. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982411001
(2004). Is the Implicit Association Test immune to faking? Experimental Psychology, 51, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165
(2010). Stereotype relevance moderates category activation: Evidence from the indirect category accessibility task (ICAT). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610372144
(1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778–793. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.778
(2012). Automaticity in anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 575–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.004
(2012). On the nature of gender categorization. Social Psychology, 43, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000076
(2011). N400 and the activation of prejudice against rural migrant workers in China. Brain Research, 1375, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.021
(2005). Controlling racial prejudice: Social-cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychological Science, 16, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00780.x
(2009). Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp004
(2008). Perceiving age and gender in unfamiliar faces: Brain potential evidence for implicit and explicit person categorization. Psychophysiology, 45, 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00707.x
(2004). Capacity and comprehension: Spontaneous stereotyping under cognitive load. Social Cognition, 22, 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.22.3.292.35967
(2007). Motivational influences on compliance with and consequences of instructions to suppress stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.03.001
(1998). The spontaneous suppression of racial stereotypes. Social Cognition, 16, 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1998.16.3.340
(