Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Measuring Burnout in Social Work

Factorial Validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey

Published Online:March 13, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000568

Abstract

Abstract. Several studies challenge the three-dimensional structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), citing alternative measurement models including bifactor models. While bifactor models have merit, if data sampling violates assumptions of Stochastic Measurement Theory (SMT) the bifactor model requires modification prior to application. The present study compared five alternative MBI-HSS factor models using both Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). Data from a cross-sectional survey of United Kingdom (UK) social workers were examined (N = 1257), with validation analyses conducted in an independent sample (N = 162). Bifactor models, re-specified to account for SMT, provided good fit. However, improved fit was observed for a bifactor-ESEM specification, in both test (χ2 = 1,112.93, df = 149, p < .001, CFI = .969, RMSEA = .072, 90% CI [.068, .076]) and validation (χ2 = 227.89, df = 149, p < .001, CFI = .978, RMSEA = .057, 90% CI [.042, .072]) samples. The results confirm the MBI-HSS possesses a bifactor structure in UK social workers when SMT is considered, and that bifactor-ESEM may provide a better framework to examine MBI-HSS.

References

  • Aiena, B. J., Baczwaski, B. J., Schulenberg, S. E., & Buchanan, E. M. (2015). Measuring resilience with the RS-14: A tale of two samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.951445 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chao, S. F., McCallion, P., & Nickle, T. (2011). Factorial validity and consistency of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among staff working with persons with intellectual disability and dementia. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55, 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01413.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Densten, I. L. (2001). Re-thinking burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dueber, D. M. (2017). Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models [Software]. https://doi.org/10.13023/edp.tool.01 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., & Heene, M. (2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22, 541. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000083 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • General Social Care Council. (2010). General social care council annual report and accounts 2009–10. London, UK: The Stationery Office Limited. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gignac, G. E. (2016). The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better. Intelligence, 55, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.01.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J., & Forest, J. (2016). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management, 44, 2638–2664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316645653 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kanste, O., Miettunen, J., & Kyngäs, H. (2006). Factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among Finnish nursing staff. Nursing & Health Sciences, 8, 201–207. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, H., & Ji, J. (2009). Factor structure and longitudinal invariance of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731508318550 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 123. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leiter, M. P. (2008). A two-process model of burnout and work engagement: Distinct implications of demands and values. Giornale Italianol di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, 30(1, Suppl A), 54–58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. Mountain View, CA: CPP and Davies-Black. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McFadden, P., Mallett, J., Campbell, A., & Taylor, B. (2019). Explaining self-reported Resilience in child-protection social work: The role of organisational factors, demographic information and job characteristics. The British Journal of Social Work, 49, 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mészáros, V., Ádám, S., Szabó, M., Szigeti, R., & Urbán, R. (2014). The bifactor model of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) – an alternative measurement model of burnout. Stress and Health, 30, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2481 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.961800 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2018). Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 8.1. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stalker, C. A., Harvey, C., Frensch, K., Mandell, D., & Adams, G. R. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Maslach Burnout Inventory: A replication with Canadian child welfare workers. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1, 77–94. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Taku, K. (2014). Relationships among perceived psychological growth, resilience and burnout in physicians. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 120–123. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tanaka, J. S. (1987). How big is big enough? Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 134–146. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (2009). The 14-Item Resilience Scale (RS-14). Wordem, MT: Resilience Center. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walkey, F. H., & Green, D. E. (1992). An exhaustive examination of the replicable factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052002006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Satele, D. V., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2012). Concurrent validity of single-item measures of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization in burnout assessment. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(11), 1445–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2015-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Worley, J. A., Vassar, M., Wheeler, D. L., & Barnes, L. L. (2008). Factor structure of scores from the Maslach Burnout Inventory a review and meta-analysis of 45 exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 797–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408315268 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yadama, G. N., & Drake, B. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Social Work Research, 19, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/19.3.184 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yung, Y. F., Thissen, D., & McLeod, L. D. (1999). On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model. Psychometrika, 64, 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294531 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar