Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Measuring Resilience Across Australia and Norway

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the English Version of the Resilience Scale for Adults

Published Online:April 05, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000509

Abstract

Abstract. Resilience has become increasingly important in clinical and health psychology, but only few scales have received good psychometric ratings for assessing various outcomes of resilience. The Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) is one of the best psychometrically rated scales and has been validated among Norwegian samples. The purpose of this study was to explore the construct validity of the RSA in an English-speaking Australian sample and test measurement invariance between the Australian sample and a Norwegian sample. An Australian sample (N = 781) completed the RSA, Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-13), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). A second sample of Norwegians (N = 320) was included in the analyses of invariance of the RSA across cultures. There were expected negative correlations between RSA and PHQ-9, and between RSA and GAD-7, but positive correlations between RSA and SOC-13. The results indicated that the six-factor measurement model of the RSA is the same in the Australian and Norwegian samples, and respondents from the two cultures understood and interpreted the items in a comparable fashion. Support was found for the cross-cultural validity of the RSA in an English-speaking Australian sample and as a valid and reliable self-report measure of protective factors.

References

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 725–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.11 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anyan, F., Worsley, L., & Hjemdal, O. (2017). Anxiety symptoms mediate the relationship between exposure to stressful negative life events and depressive symptoms: A conditional process modelling of the protective effects of resilience. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 29, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2017.04.019 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Capanna, C., Stratta, P., Hjemdal, O., Collazzoni, A., & Rossi, A. (2015). The Italian validation study of the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA). BPA-Applied Psychology Bulletin (Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata), 63(272), 16–24. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: A Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Friborg, O., Barlaug, D., Martinussen, M., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Hjemdal, O. (2005). Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 14, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.15 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Martinussen, M., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2009). Empirical support for resilience as more than the counterpart and absence of vulnerability and symptoms of mental disorder. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.3.138 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Martinussen, M. (2003). A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.143 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Friborg, O., Martinussen, M., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2006). Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Friborg, O., Sørlie, T., & Hansen, K. L. (2017). Resilience to discrimination among indigenous Sami and non-Sami populations: The SAMINOR2 study. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 48, 1009–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117719159 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Garmezy, N. (1974). The study of competence in children at risk for severe psychopathology. In E. AnthonyC. KoupernikEds., The child in his family: Children at psychiatric risk (Vol. III, pp. 547). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Garmezy, N. (1987). Stress, competence, and development: Continuities in the study of schizophrenic adults, children vulnerable to psychopathology, and the search for stress-resistant children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03526.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hilbig, J., Viliūnienė, R., Friborg, O., Pakalniškienė, V., & Danilevičiūtė, V. (2015). Resilience in a reborn nation: Validation of the Lithuanian Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA). Comprehensive Psychiatry, 60, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.02.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hjemdal, O., Friborg, O., Braun, S., Kempenaers, C., Linkowski, P., & Fossion, P. (2011). The Resilience Scale for adults: Construct validity and measurement in a Belgian sample. International Journal of Testing, 11, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.508570 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hjemdal, O., Friborg, O., Martinussen, M., & Rosenvinge, J. (2001). Preliminary results from the development and validation of a Norwegian scale for measuring adult resilience. Journal of the Norwegian Psychological Association, 38, 310–317. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hjemdal, O., Friborg, O., Stiles, T. C., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Martinussen, M. (2006). Resilience predicting psychiatric symptoms: A prospective study of protective factors and their role in adjustment to stressful life events. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.488 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hjemdal, O., Roazzi, A., Maria da Graça, B., & Friborg, O. (2015). The cross-cultural validity of the Resilience Scale for Adults: A comparison between Norway and Brazil. BMC Psychology, 3, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0076-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jowkar, B., Hjemdal, O., & Friborg, O. (2010). Cross-cultural validation of the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) in Iran. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00794.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, C.-H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21, 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400005812 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raykov, T. (2001). Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711001159582 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reivich, K., Gillham, J. E., Chaplin, T. M., & Seligman, M. E. (2013). From helplessness to optimism: The role of resilience in treating and preventing depression in youth. In S. GoldsteinR. B. BrooksEds., Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 201–214). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3661-4_12 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In R. D. H. HeijmansD. S. G. PollockA. SatorraEds., Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics (Vol. 36, pp. 233–247). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4603-0_17 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar