Skip to main content
Brief Report

Assessing the Clinical Utility of the Eating Beliefs Questionnaire

Results From Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis With a Clinical Sample

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000496

Abstract. The Eating Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ) is a valid and reliable self-report tool measuring positive and negative beliefs about binge eating. This study sought to further investigate the clinical utility of the EBQ using a clinical binge eating sample and a healthy control comparison group. Clinical participants were 74 individuals seeking treatment for eating disorders: 38 with bulimia nervosa and 36 with binge eating disorder. Healthy controls were 114 individuals recruited from the general community. Participants all completed a test battery that included the EBQ. Diagnoses of clinical participants were confirmed using the semi-structured interview, the Eating Disorders Examination, administered by a trained clinician. The EBQ and its subscales showed good internal consistency, and significant differences between the clinical and nonclinical groups were observed for EBQ total and subscales scores, but not between the two clinical groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed optimal cutoff scores for the EBQ, which demonstrated excellent sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results from this study provide further evidence in support of the EBQ’s psychometric properties. Clinical cutoff scores can be used to assess severity of binge eating-related cognitions in both research and clinical settings.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burton, A. L., & Abbott, M. J. (2017). Conceptualising binge eating: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Behaviour Change, 34, 168–198. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burton, A. L., Abbott, M. J., Modini, M., & Touyz, S. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of self‐report measures of binge eating symptoms and related psychopathology: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49, 123–140. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burton, A. L., Hay, P., Kleitman, S., Smith, E., Raman, J., Swinbourne, J., … Abbott, M. J. (2017). Confirmatory factor analysis and examination of the psychometric properties of the eating beliefs questionnaire. BMC Psychiatry, 17, 237 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cooper, M. J., Wells, A., & Todd, G. (2004). A cognitive model of bulimia nervosa. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 1–16. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fairburn, C. G., & Beglin, S. J. (1994). Assessment of eating disorders: Interview or self‐report questionnaire? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16, 363–370. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fairburn, C. G., Wilson, G. T., & Schleimer, K. (1993). Binge eating: Nature, assessment, and treatment. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fluss, R., Faraggi, D., & Reiser, B. (2005). Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biometrical Journal, 47, 458–472. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grilo, C. M., Masheb, R. M., & Wilson, G. T. (2001). A comparison of different methods for assessing the features of eating disorders in patients with binge eating disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 317 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Groves, S. J., Baillie, A. J., & Abbott, M. J. (2018). The development and validation of the Eating Beliefs Questionnaire: Positive and negative beliefs about binge-eating. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hsiao, J. K., Bartko, J. J., & Potter, W. Z. (1989). Diagnosing diagnoses: Receiver operating characteristic methods and psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 664–667. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar