Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Questionnaire of Ethical Leadership (QueL)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000533

Abstract. In this five-study paper, we developed and validated the Questionnaire of ethical Leadership (QueL). We examined the factor structure of QueL using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, along with measurement invariance techniques, using data from more than 1,200 leaders and subordinates working in Greece. Exploratory analysis indicated two latent highly-correlated factors that were labeled “Telos” and “Ethos.” Confirmatory analysis verified a bifactor solution. The bifactor QueL showed configural, metric, and scalar invariance across independent samples of leaders and subordinates. QueL was found to be a reliable measure across time and occupational groups (leaders and subordinates). We found criterion correlations in the expected direction with other ethical leadership scales, related constructs (i.e., integrity, trust, ethical climate), as well as workplace attitudes and behaviors (i.e., burnout, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behaviors, deviant behaviors), leadership characteristics (transformational and transactional leadership, abusive supervision, personality), and socio-demographics (i.e., educational level and gender). We conclude that the new measure is a valuable tool for measuring workplace ethical leadership.

References

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 181–217. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139, 517–536. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J. P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 219–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 53, 39–52. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.19.1.12. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleenor, J. W., Smither, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Braddy, P. W., & Sturm, R. E. (2010). Self–other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1005–1034. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frisch, C., & Huppenbauer, M. (2014). New insights into ethical leadership: A qualitative investigation of the experiences of executive ethical leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 23–43. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harkness, J. A., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (1998). Questionnaires in translation. Zuma-Nachrichten Spezial, 7, 87–125. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis. In H. E. TinsleyS. D. BrownEds., Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 465–497). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 435–446. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2011a). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 51–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2011b). Ethical leader behavior and big five factors of personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 349–366. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, H., & Yukl, G. (1995). Relationships of managerial effectiveness and advancement to self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviors from the multiple-linkage mode. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 361–377. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mitropoulou, E. M., Tsaousis, I., Xanthopoulou, D., & Petrides, N. (2014). In search of the characteristics of ethical leaders: An empirical study in the workplace. Psychology, 21, 161–182. [In Greek]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, 32, 396–402. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raykov, T. (1998). Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated non-homogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 375–385. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwepker, C. H. Jr., & Good, D. J. (1999). The impact of sales quotas on moral judgment in the financial services industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 13, 38–58. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, T., Friedman, R., Liu, L. A., & McLean Parks, J. (2007). Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and “trickle down” among Black and non-Black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 650–691. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spangenberg, H., & Theron, C. C. (2005). Promoting ethical follower behaviour through leadership of ethics: The development of the Ethical Leadership Inventory (ELI). South African Journal of Business Management, 36, 1–18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spector, P. E., Bauer, J. A., & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 781–790. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stouten, J., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D. M., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. C. (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 680–695. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tanner, C., Brügger, A., van Schie, S., & Lebherz, C. (2010). Actions speak louder than words: The benefits of ethical behaviors of leaders. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 218, 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000032 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56, 5–37. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsaousis, Ι. (2015, May). Construction and Psychometric Evaluation of the Work Personality Inventory (WPI). Oral presentation presented at the 15th Hellenic Conference of Psychological Assessment, Nicosia Cyprus. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Watkins, M. W. (2013). Omega [Computer software]. Phoenix, AZ: Ed & Psych Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 20, 38–48. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Yu, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, L. (2011). Ethical leadership in Chinese organizations: Developing a scale. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 5, 179–181. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar