Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Effects of Visual Displays in Attenuating Discrepancies Between Self-Reported and Physiological Indexes of Stress

Published Online:May 15, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000587

Abstract

Abstract. This study examined whether the relationship between subjective and physiological outcomes of stress, and the responsivity to stressors, are affected by whether participants can see a visual display of their physiological output. Participants were randomly assigned to have a visible view of their physiological output readings, or to a condition in which physiological output readings were out of view. Participants individually completed a 30-min laboratory study including the modified Trier Social Stress Task. Both physiological markers of stress (heart rate and blood pressure) and subjective evaluations of stress (visual analog scale) were measured. Results found little congruency across subjective and physiological measures of stress. The visible visual display condition had elevated physiological arousal, while no group differences were observed in self-reported stress. Findings from the study provide insight into the use of visual physiological displays and hold practical implications for both the measurement of stress in research, and the development of wearable technologies without accompanying response strategies.

References

  • Astin, J. A., Shapiro, S. L., Eisenberg, D. M., & Forys, K. L. (2003). Mind-body medicine: State of the science, implications for practice. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 16, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.16.2.131 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, C. L., Van Doren, N., Ford, B. Q., Mauss, I. B., Sze, J. W., & Levenson, R. W. (2019). Coherence between subjective experience and physiology in emotion: Individual differences and implications for well-being. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000579 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cobos, B., Haskard-Zolnierek, K., & Howard, K. (2015). White coat hypertension: Improving the patient-health care practitioner relationship. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 8, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S61192 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. SpacapanS. OskampEds., The Social Psychology of Health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ekeberg, O., Kjeldsen, S. E., Greenwood, D. T., & Enger, E. (1990). Correlations between psychological and physiological responses to acute flight phobia stress. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical Lab Investigations, 50, 671–677. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365519009089186 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The “Triers Social Stress Test” – a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lesage, F. X., Berjot, S., & Deschamps, F. (2012). Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occupational Medicine, 62, 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs140 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, B. J., Bailenson, J. M., Pimes, A., Greenleaf, W. J., & Williams, L. M. (2017). A public database of immersive VR videos with corresponding ratings of arousal, valence, and correlations between head movements and self report measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liu, J. J. W., Ein, N., Gervasio, J., & Vickers, K. (2019). The efficacy of stress reappraisal interventions on stress responsivity: A meta-analysis and systematic review of existing evidence. PLoS One, 14, e0212854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212854 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS One, 7, e48230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048230 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency, and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(86)90143-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, N. B., Richey, J. A., & Fitzpatrick, K. K. (2006). Discomfort intolerance: Development of a construct and measure relevant to panic disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20, 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2005.02.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sommerfeldt, S. L., Schaefer, S. M., Brauer, M., Ryff, C. D., & Davison, R. J. (2019). Individual differences in the association between subjective stress and heart rate are related to psychological and physical well-being. Psychological Science, 30, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619849555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Dijk, E. T., Westerink, J. H., Beute, F., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2015). In sync: The effect of physiology feedback on the match between heart rate and self-reported stress. BioMed Research International, 2015, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/134606 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Fenema, E. M., Gal, P., van de Griend, M. V., Jacobs, G. E., & Cohen, A. F. (2017). A pilot study evaluating the physiological parameters of performance-induced stress in undergraduate music students. Digit Biomark, 1, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485469 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vickers, K., Jafarpour, S., Mofidi, A., Rafat, B., & Woznica, A. (2012). The 35% carbon dioxide test in stress and panic research: Overview of effects and integration of findings. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.12.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar